People Are Learning Why There’s A Tiny Black Triangle Above Plane Windows

You may already know the real reason flight attendants greet you when you come on board, or what’s actually going on when you’re barred from returning to the plane when you’ve left something behind.

But if you’ve ever noticed some mysterious black triangles above certain plain windows, they might have left you stumped.

Luckily, people like u/altrightobserver over on Reddit’s r/todayilearned, a subreddit dedicated to surprising trivia.

“TIL about the ‘William Shatner’ seat, a term for the seat on an aeroplane providing the clearest view of the wings, allowing flight attendants and other crew easier inspection. It is denoted with a black triangle,” they wrote.

Is that true? What is a “Shatner seat”?

On TikTok, a flight attendant for Cebu Pacific, Henny Joyce Lim, agreed.

“Passengers sitting next to the triangles get the best view of the wings,” she added.

“If the flight crew need to check the wings, these triangles let them know the best vantage points for the slats and flaps outside.”

In other words, if something seems to be wrong with the wings of the plane, either mid-flight or on the runway, this is the vantage point from which staff assess the situation. It can also help to check for ice on the wings.

The pro suggested picking seats beneath these tiny triangular stickers if you get the option to select your row on board, because the scenery it offers is stunning.

She also advised that “those triangle-marked seats are either at number 10 or at 18, but it still depends on the type of aircraft one is travelling in.”

The area is sometimes nicknamed the William Shatner seat because of the actor’s scene in the Twilight Zone – the episode Nightmare At 20,000 Feet, to be specific.

In this scene, his character saw something suspicious on the wing of the plane, leading to the iconic line: “There’s something on the wing!”.

While the premise is pretty terrifying, his character’s clear view could have only come from one seat: the black triangle zone.

People were pretty surprised

“I always wondered what that little black triangle above the windows was for. Makes so much sense now,” Redditor u/Far_Caterpillar_6819 wrote.

“I’ve never noticed the little triangle, but every flight where I could see the wing, I’ve thought of that episode,” u/Darth_Jinn added.

As some commenters noted, not all planes will have the tiny mark. They seem to be more common in Airbus planes.

Personally, though, I’ll keep my eyes peeled for them forever more…

Share Button

This Common Word Has A Christian Message Most People Don’t Know About

You probably say “goodbye” multiple times a day without thinking twice. It’s the way you bid farewell to a friend, partner, relative, coworker, etc. And the word is so ordinary that most people never consider where it actually came from.

As it turns out, its origins are religious.

″‘Goodbye’ began as ‘God be with ye,’ with the first sighting as early as 1565,” Madeline Enos, a language trends expert and communications manager at the language learning platform Preply, told HuffPost.

“Over time, the phrase shrank, the spelling changed, and the religious meaning faded. Today it’s one of the most common ways to end a conversation in English.”

That kind of shortening remains very common in English, noted Michael Adams, an English professor at Indiana University.

“To be honest, English speakers just like fewer syllables, so it’s very likely some sort of abbreviation will occur to some people – in this case, a way of saying it recognisably but more easily than ‘God be with you’ or ‘God be with ye,’” he explained.

Add in the “Great Vowel Shift” that occurred around the 15th and 16th centuries and you can see how the pronunciation of the English language changed over time as well.

“The English word is a contraction of ‘God be with ye,’ compressed over centuries of everyday use into something said entirely on autopilot,” said Noel Wolf, a linguist and cultural expert at the language learning platform Babbel. “The phrase passed through stages ― ‘God be with ye,’ then ‘godbwye,’ then ‘goodbye,’ each shortening a small act of erosion by daily use.”

One of the earliest written records of the word comes from 1573 in a letter by English writer and scholar Gabriel Harvey, who wrote: “To requite your gallonde [gallon] of godbwyes, I regive you a pottle [half-gallon] of howdyes.”

“It does remind us that these can be complicated issues, the way that sounds change and words are formed over centuries,” Adams said. “If you’re not paying attention, you can miss what makes a current word what it is. It’s never a static thing. And what’s interesting is now people think “goodbye” means “good wishes,” but really the ‘good’ comes from ‘God.’ The word ‘God’ was extended phonetically into ‘good.’”

He added that the phrase “God be with you” still exists – it has just become something separate from “goodbye” in people’s minds today.

“It is a neat illustration of how the language people use without thinking a dozen times a day can uncover history,” Wolf said. “Every time someone says goodbye, whether it be hanging up the phone, leaving the office, dropping kids at school gates, they are unwittingly invoking a 500-year-old blessing.”

Enos also pointed to goodbye as an example of the durability of history through language, even when people aren’t aware of the backstory.

“English speakers have been saying some version of ‘goodbye’ for more than 400 years,” she said. “Since then the word has survived religious upheaval, industrialisation, and the digital age. ‘Goodbye’ has withstood the test of time.”

Happy woman with disposable coffee cup waving while leaving cafe

Cavan Images via Getty Images

Happy woman with disposable coffee cup waving while leaving cafe

It’s not just in English where the word for farewell carries religious meaning.

″‘Goodbye’ in Romance languages is similar – ‘adieu’ comes from the French ‘à Dieu,’ meaning ‘to God,’” Enos explained. ”‘Vaya con Dios’ directly translates to ‘go with God’ in Spanish – it was just never contracted or secularised. It is fascinating to see languages arrive at the same idea, placing someone in the care of a higher power to remain safe when parting, very poetic.”

The Spanish adiós is the same as adieu, literally meaning “to God.” The goodbye salutations in other languages offer similar sentiments.

“Arabic ma’a salama means ‘go with peace,‘” Wolf said. “Hebrew ‘shalom’ – used for both greeting and farewell – carries the broader meaning of wholeness and harmony. The Japanese ‘oshare ni’, loosely ‘go well’, and the Swahili ‘kwaheri’, derived from the Arabic for ‘may you be well,’ echo the same impulse from entirely different linguistic traditions. The instinct to protect someone at the moment of parting appears to be close to universal.”

She emphasised this cross-cultural instinct to treat the moment of parting as something that requires a little more than simple small talk.

“Whether through religious commendation, a wish for safety or an expression of peace, languages have tended to load their farewells with their deepest values,” Wolf said. “The cosmologies that produced these words have largely faded. The words themselves have not.”

“Goodbye” is also not the only word in the English language with religious origins that many people aren’t aware of.

“Many everyday words began with religious meanings before gradually becoming secular,” Enos said. ”‘Holiday’ comes from ‘holy day.’ And ‘gossip’ originally referred to a godparent or close family friend, then extended to close family friend and eventually to someone who does idle talk, then the idle talk itself.”

Wolf gave the example of saying “bless you” after a sneeze, which many attribute to Pope Gregory I. During a plague, the religious leader supposedly encouraged Christians to respond to sneezes with genuine prayer – a tradition that deepened in subsequent health crises.

“Another interesting example is the word silly,” Wolf said. “In Old English, the term ‘silly’ originally meant ‘blessed,’ before drifting through ‘innocent’ and ‘deserving of pity’ on its journey to its current meaning. ‘Disaster’ carries the literal meaning of a bad alignment of the stars. The Italian equivalent, ‘disastro’, shares the same root, ‘dis’ meaning bad, ‘astro’ meaning star, as does the French ‘désastre’ – suggesting a shared ancient anxiety about the heavens governing human fate written across multiple languages simultaneously.”

Adams offered another fun example: the exclamation “Jiminy Cricket”.

“It’s a light euphemism that derives from words for Jesus Christ,” he explained. “It becomes a name for a cartoon cricket later, but at first, it was an exclamation that allowed people to not take the name of God in vain.”

Indeed, many connect “Jiminy Cricket” to the Italian “Gesù Cristo” and the Latin “Jesu Domine,” There was also the old-fashioned euphemism “criminy” and “gemini,” which are believed to have religious backstories.

So phrases like “Jiminy Cricket” evolved as a sort of linguistic loophole – much the same way ‘sugar’ became a stand-in for a different four-letter word, or ‘fudge’ for another…

“English is dense with this kind of residue,” Wolf said. “Centuries of religion, superstition and cultural encounter compressed into words that now simply mean whatever we need them to mean.”

Share Button

There’s A Reason Your Friends Have More Friends Than You

In 2012, Pew Research found that while the typical Facebook user had 245 Facebook friends, the average *friend* someone has on Facebook had 359.

That sounds completely illogical at first. But it’s explained by the “friendship paradox,” a term resulting from sociologist Professor Scott Feld’s 1991 paper.

The phenomenon has since been translated into mathematical theories.

But what exactly is this “friendship paradox”, and what does it actually mean for our social lives?

What is the friendship paradox?

In a Purdue University video, Prof Feld said he was “surprised” to find “that it’s always true in social networks that friends in general have more friends on average than people do”.

If that sounds a bit like a head-scratcher, well, it is (hence the “paradox” part).

“People assume that if there’s a pair of friends, one must have more friends and the other must have [fewer] friends, so you would expect that half the people would have fewer friends than their friends,” he continued.

But instead, he said, some people have loads of friends, and naturally, those people are likelier to be friends with lots of people who have fewer friends than them.

And the other people who have fewer friends are less likely to be our mates.

In other words, it’s not so much that most people hover around an average amount of friends, with some having slightly more than others. Instead, very extroverted people throw the balance off a lot (a bit like counting billionaires when calculating people’s net worth).

“Each of us seems to be thinking that our friends have more friends than we do, which they, in fact, do, because our friends are the people who are friends with everybody,” said Prof Feld.

Later analysis found that the mathematical premise of the “friendship paradox” seems to bear out in real life.

So… what does that mean?

Well, Professor Feld said, one takeaway could be to remember that comparing yourself to your mates isn’t really a great indicator of your true standing: we should try to remember that this sample is “biased”.

Secondly, on a broader level, it means some people could spread more of anything – from ideas to disease and misinformation – than the average person might, meaning more of us are influenced than influencing.

“So if you want to stop the spread of a pandemic,” Prof Feld continued, “you really would like to vaccinate people’s friends more than you’d want to vaccinate random people.”

The same goes for switching people onto a certain product. Basically, whatever spread you want to create, track, or predict, you’re better off looking at other people’s mates’ habits than their own.

Share Button

So THAT’s Why Coat ‘Tails’ Start Off Sewn Up

Attending a Christmas market recently, TikToker @_ohhellojo noticed something she thought was linked to people getting new coats over the festive season; many of them still had their back flaps sewn shut.

In the comments, netizens wondered why the thread existed to begin with. “I don’t get why they sew it together if it’s not meant to be together,” one response reads.

“Maybe they need to put a little reminder tag on there. BECAUSE WHY WOULD PPL KNOW THIS!?,” yet another TikTok user wrote.

So, we thought we’d share why coat “tails” – which are actually the garment’s vent – are often sewn shut when new.

Why are coat “tails” sewn shut?

Dr Brett Staniland, a sustainable fashion expert, said in an Instagram Reel that this X-shaped stitch is called a “basting stitch” or “tacking stitch”.

They’re placed at the bottom of the coat’s centre vent, at the back.

These are “temporary stitches left in by the maker before the final sewing is done. But they’re also kept in to prevent the garment being damaged or wrinkled during transportation, or when they’re sat in shops”.

Esquire agreed that it helps the garment to keep its shape before wear.

The publication added that removing this stitch should be the first thing you do when you get a new coat.

Cut them with some scissors “to prevent the rest of the fabric from being damaged” rather than ripping the threads apart with your hands, Dr Stanilard said, and you should be good to go.

Why do some coats have “vents” to begin with?

The back slit on some coats and jackets is called a “vent”. It was originally created so gentlemen could sit more comfortably on the back of a horse – it split over the saddle rather than bunching around the riders’ hips.

Some coats and suit jackets also have side vents.

Though wearers aren’t as likely to hop on a steed these days, the addition still allows for a greater range of movement than no-vent options.

That’s why cutting the stitch in your coat’s centre vent (at the back) will offer “better movement as you go about your day”.

Share Button

Buddy The Elf Was Almost Played By A Different Actor

The film came out over 20 years ago (2003, would you believe it) and still, Elf is a family favourite in many households. In fact, in an ongoing survey by Newsround, Elf is currently the third most popular Christmas film in the UK, just behind Nativity and Home Alone, which has taken the top spot.

Along with Anchorman which came out in 2004, Elf is one of the films that comedian and actor Will Ferrell is known for. He plays Buddy with such whimiscal charm that it was one of his career-defining roles.

However, the actor wasn’t the first choice for the flick and was actually given it a decade after the original script was written.

The actor originally chosen to play Buddy the Elf

So, the script for Elf was written way back in 2003 by David Berenbaum and according to film website Screen Rant, the role was written with actor Jim Carrey in mind.

This may be surprising but this same year, the actor was filming Ace Ventura: Pet Detective and starring in In Living Color. He really was just about to become a comedy giant in Hollywood. Screen Rant also explain: “Given his wild and zany characters on In Living Color, Carrey was seen as a natural for the goofiness and playfulness needed to play Buddy the Elf.”

While I personally prefer Jim Carrey, it really is hard to imagine anybody but Will Ferrell playing the role and it turns out, the actor thought the exact same.

He and screenwriter Adam McKay took on the script after several years of stagnation and decide to make it themselves with director Jon Favreau. The film originally had a darker tone but this trio made it into the modern fairytale that we see on our screens every year now.

Elf is available to stream on Netflix UK.

Share Button

People Are Just Realising Stuart Little Isn’t A Mouse, And I Need To Lie Down

There are some things I thought I could take for granted. I always assumed paprika came from some spicy variety of pepper, but while traditional ones can contain varying degrees of heat, many large manufacturers use a type of sweet bell pepper instead.

I’d believed “wi-fi” stood for something, like “wifeless fidelity,” too. Nope: its name “doesn’t stand for anything. It is not an acronym. There is no meaning”.

But even I, a person who could fairly be described as “professionally bemused,” was uniquely surprised to learn that Stuart Little is not actually a mouse.

And looking at the responses to an X post from film critic and editor of Slash Film, Chris Evangelista, it seems I’m not alone.

<div class="js-react-hydrator" data-component-name="Twitter" data-component-id="8623" data-component-props="{"itemType":"rich","index":6,"contentIndexByType":2,"contentListType":"embed","code":"

I’ve just now learned that in the STUART LITTLE book, Stuart is not actually a mouse but a human boy who looks like a mouse, and I don’t know how to process this pic.twitter.com/W2mGvwWula

— Chris Evangelista (@cevangelista413) December 8, 2025

","type":"rich","meta":{"author":"Chris Evangelista","author_url":"https://twitter.com/cevangelista413","cache_age":86400,"description":"I’ve just now learned that in the STUART LITTLE book, Stuart is not actually a mouse but a human boy who looks like a mouse, and I don’t know how to process this pic.twitter.com/W2mGvwWula— Chris Evangelista (@cevangelista413) December 8, 2025\n\n\n","options":{"_hide_media":{"label":"Hide photos, videos, and cards","value":false},"_maxwidth":{"label":"Adjust width","placeholder":"220-550, in px","value":""},"_theme":{"value":"","values":{"dark":"Use dark theme"}}},"provider_name":"Twitter","thumbnail_height":799,"thumbnail_url":"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G7qwfUXWkAAsXVP.jpg:large","thumbnail_width":1170,"title":"Chris Evangelista on Twitter / X","type":"rich","url":"https://twitter.com/cevangelista413/status/1998103439646368241","version":"1.0"},"flags":[],"enhancements":{"fonts":{"primary":{},"accent":{},"caption":{}}},"fullBleed":false,"options":{"theme":"news","device":"desktop","editionInfo":{"id":"uk","name":"U.K.","link":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk","locale":"en_GB"},"originalEdition":"uk","isMapi":false,"isAmp":false,"isMobile":false,"isAdsFree":false,"isVideoEntry":false,"isEntry":true,"isMt":false,"entryId":"6939735be4b0447a52b94db2","entryPermalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/staurt-ittle-human-explained_uk_6939735be4b0447a52b94db2","entryTagsList":"twitter,trivia,reddit,books,movies","sectionSlug":"entertainment","deptSlug":null,"sectionRedirectUrl":null,"subcategories":"","isWide":false,"isShopping":false,"headerOverride":null,"noVideoAds":false,"disableFloat":false,"isNative":false,"commercialVideo":{"provider":"custom","site_and_category":"uk.entertainment","package":null},"isHighline":false,"vidibleConfigValues":{"cid":"60afc140cf94592c45d7390c","disabledWithMapiEntries":false,"overrides":{"all":"60b8e525cdd90620331baaf4"},"whitelisted":["56c5f12ee4b03a39c93c9439","56c6056ee4b01f2b7e1b5f35","59bfee7f9e451049f87f550b","5acccbaac269d609ef44c529","570278d2e4b070ff77b98217","57027b4be4b070ff77b98d5c","56fe95c4e4b0041c4242016b","570279cfe4b06d08e3629954","5ba9e8821c2e65639162ccf1","5bcd9904821576674bc55ced","5d076ca127f25f504327c72e","5b35266b158f855373e28256","5ebac2e8abddfb04f877dff2","60b8e525cdd90620331baaf4","60b64354b171b7444beaff4d","60d0d8e09340d7032ad0fb1a","60d0d90f9340d7032ad0fbeb","60d0d9949340d7032ad0fed3","60d0d9f99340d7032ad10113","60d0daa69340d7032ad104cf","60d0de02b627221e9d819408"],"playlists":{"default":"57bc306888d2ff1a7f6b5579","news":"56c6dbcee4b04edee8beb49c","politics":"56c6dbcee4b04edee8beb49c","entertainment":"56c6e7f2e4b0983aa64c60fc","tech":"56c6f70ae4b043c5bdcaebf9","parents":"56cc65c2e4b0239099455b42","lifestyle":"56cc66a9e4b01f81ef94e98c"},"playerUpdates":{"56c6056ee4b01f2b7e1b5f35":"60b8e525cdd90620331baaf4","56c5f12ee4b03a39c93c9439":"60d0d8e09340d7032ad0fb1a","59bfee7f9e451049f87f550b":"60d0d90f9340d7032ad0fbeb","5acccbaac269d609ef44c529":"60d0d9949340d7032ad0fed3","5bcd9904821576674bc55ced":"60d0d9f99340d7032ad10113","5d076ca127f25f504327c72e":"60d0daa69340d7032ad104cf","5ebac2e8abddfb04f877dff2":"60d0de02b627221e9d819408"}},"connatixConfigValues":{"defaultPlayer":"16b0ecc6-802c-4120-845f-e90629812c4d","clickToPlayPlayer":"823ac03a-0f7e-4bcb-8521-a5b091ae948d","videoPagePlayer":"05041ada-93f7-4e86-9208-e03a5b19311b","defaultPlaylist":"2e062669-71b4-41df-b17a-df6b1616bc8f"},"topConnatixThumnbailSrc":"https://img.connatix.com/09fb54e9-b866-443f-a6dd-599526561256/1_th.jpg?crop=629:354,smart&width=629&height=354&format=jpeg&quality=60&fit=crop","customAmpComponents":[],"ampAssetsUrl":"https://amp.assets.huffpost.com","videoTraits":null,"positionInUnitCounts":{"buzz_head":{"count":0},"buzz_body":{"count":0},"buzz_bottom":{"count":0}},"positionInSubUnitCounts":{"article_body":{"count":13},"blog_summary":{"count":0},"before_you_go_content":{"count":0}},"connatixCountsHelper":{"count":1},"buzzfeedTracking":{"context_page_id":"6939735be4b0447a52b94db2","context_page_type":"buzz","destination":"huffpost","mode":"desktop","page_edition":"en-uk"},"tags":[{"name":"Twitter","slug":"twitter","links":{"relativeLink":"news/twitter","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/twitter","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/twitter"},"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/twitter/"},{"name":"trivia","slug":"trivia","links":{"relativeLink":"news/trivia","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/trivia","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/trivia"},"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/trivia/"},{"name":"Reddit","slug":"reddit","links":{"relativeLink":"news/reddit","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/reddit","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/reddit"},"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/reddit/"},{"name":"books","slug":"books","links":{"relativeLink":"news/books","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/books","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/books"},"relegenceSubjectId":978205,"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/books/"},{"name":"Movies","slug":"movies","links":{"relativeLink":"news/movies","permalink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/movies","mobileWebLink":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/movies"},"relegenceSubjectId":981358,"url":"https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/news/movies/"}],"isLiveblogLive":null,"isLiveblog":false,"backfillRelatedArticles":[],"signInUrl":"https://login.huffpost.com/login?dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffpost.com%2Fentry%2Fstaurt-ittle-human-explained_uk_6939735be4b0447a52b94db2%3Fhp_auth_done%3D1","cetUnit":"buzz_body","enableIncontentPlayer":false,"bodyAds":["

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline-1\", \"entry_paragraph_1\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline\", \"entry_paragraph_2\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline-2\", \"entry_paragraph_3\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n","

\r\n\r\n HPGam.cmd.push(function(){\r\n\t\treturn HPGam.render(\"inline-infinite\", \"repeating_dynamic_display\", false, false);\r\n });\r\n\r\n"],"adCount":0,"midArticleAdPartner":null},"isCollectionEmbed":false}”>

I’ve just now learned that in the STUART LITTLE book, Stuart is not actually a mouse but a human boy who looks like a mouse, and I don’t know how to process this pic.twitter.com/W2mGvwWula

— Chris Evangelista (@cevangelista413) December 8, 2025

In the books, Stuart Little is a human

The film Stuart Little is based on the book Stuart Little by EB White (also the author of Charlotte’s Web).

And I sincerely regret to inform you that the first chapter of that cursed tome novel, “In The Drain,” begins in this haunting manner:

“When Mrs Frederick C. Little’s second son arrived, everybody noticed that he was not much bigger than a mouse. The truth of the matter was, the baby looked very much like a mouse in every way. He was only about two inches high; and he had a mouse’s sharp nose, a mouse’s tail, a mouse’s whiskers, and the pleasant, shy manner of a mouse. Before he was many days old he was not only looking like a mouse but acting like one, too – wearing a grey hat and carrying a small cane. Mr and Mrs Little named him Stuart, and Mr Little made him a tiny bed out of four clothespins and a cigarette box.

So, while publisher Harper Collins markets the children’s book as a “classic novel about a small mouse… born to a family of humans,” the perhaps less invested Britannica is more alive to its body horror realities.

It is, they point out, about a “two-inch-tall boy who resembles a mouse”.

Which begs the question, A24 Stuart Little remake when?

People had… thoughts

In response to the recent X post, one netizen called the news “disturbing”.

Another pointed to the historical myth of sooterkins. These were believed to be the rat-like afterbirth of some Dutch women (great! Normal!).

But it is not the first time innocent internet users have become aware of the fact.

A post shared to Reddit’s r/todayilearned pointed out the “mouse”’s true species in 2018.

“He also tries to get frisky/date a girl who is tiny like him and looks like a human,” wrote u/Atoning_Unifex.

Yup, that’d be Harriet Ames, who does not look like a mouse. Stuart got the hots for her after hearing that she was a little “shorter” than him, and after a shopkeeper “gave [him] a most favourable report of [her] character and appearance”.

They did not work out. But notably, Stuart Little began a letter to her by saying, “I am a young person of modest proportions” (italics mine).

All in all, I’m with u/MattheJ1: “If I were Mr Little, I’d be asking some questions”.

Share Button