Decision made after outbreaks in 2024, when there were nearly 3,000 cases in England and Wales.
A dying star’s final breath glows in a new Webb image of the Helix Nebula

First observed in the early 1800s, the Helix Nebula has become one of the most recognizable planetary nebulas in the sky thanks to its bold, ring-like appearance. As one of the closest planetary nebulas to Earth, it offers astronomers a rare opportunity to closely examine the final stages of a star’s life. For decades, scientists have studied it using both ground-based and space-based telescopes.
Now, the James Webb Space Telescope has taken those observations further by delivering the most detailed infrared view ever captured of this familiar object.
A Preview of the Sun’s Distant Fate
Webb’s powerful instruments allow scientists to zoom deep into the Helix Nebula, offering a glimpse of what could eventually happen to our own Sun and planetary system. The telescope’s sharp infrared vision clearly reveals the structure of gas flowing away from a dying star. This material, once part of the star itself, is being returned to space, where it can later contribute to the formation of new stars and planets.
Images from Webb’s NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) reveal dense pillars of gas that resemble comets with long trailing tails. These features outline the inner edge of an expanding shell of material. They form as fast-moving, extremely hot winds from the dying star slam into cooler layers of dust and gas that were released earlier in the star’s life. The collisions carve and sculpt the nebula, creating its intricate and textured appearance.
How Webb’s View Compares to Earlier Observations
Since its discovery nearly two centuries ago, the Helix Nebula has been observed by many telescopes. Webb’s near-infrared images bring small knots of gas and dust into much sharper focus than the soft, glowing view seen in images from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The new data also highlights a clear transition from the hottest gas near the center to much cooler material farther out, as the nebula continues to expand away from its central star.
At the center of the Helix Nebula is a white dwarf, the exposed core left behind after the star shed its outer layers. Although it sits just outside the frame of Webb’s image, its influence is unmistakable. Intense radiation from the white dwarf energizes the surrounding gas, producing a range of environments. Closest to the core is hot, ionized gas, followed by cooler regions rich in molecular hydrogen. Farther out, sheltered pockets within dust clouds allow more complex molecules to begin forming. These regions contain the basic materials that can eventually help build new planets in other star systems.
What the Colors in Webb’s Image Reveal
In Webb’s image, color is used to represent differences in temperature and chemical makeup. Blue tones indicate the hottest gas, energized by strong ultraviolet radiation. Yellow areas show cooler regions where hydrogen atoms bond together to form molecules. Along the outer edges, red hues trace the coldest material, where gas thins and dust begins to take shape. Together, these colors illustrate how a star’s final outflow becomes the raw material for future worlds, adding to Webb’s growing contributions to our understanding of how planets form.
The Helix Nebula lies about 650 light-years from Earth in the constellation Aquarius. Its relative closeness and striking structure have made it a favorite target for both amateur skywatchers and professional astronomers.
More Information About the James Webb Space Telescope
Webb is the largest and most powerful space telescope ever launched. As part of an international collaboration, ESA provided the launch service using the Ariane 5 rocket. ESA also oversaw the development and testing of Ariane 5 modifications for the mission and arranged the launch through Arianespace. In addition, ESA contributed the NIRSpec instrument and 50% of the mid-infrared instrument MIRI, which was designed and built by a consortium of nationally funded European Institutes (The MIRI European Consortium) working in partnership with JPL and the University of Arizona.
Webb is a joint project involving NASA, ESA, and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA).
Distant entangled atoms acting as one sensor deliver stunning precision

Researchers at the University of Basel and the Laboratoire Kastler Brossel have shown that quantum entanglement can be used to measure several physical quantities at the same time with greater accuracy than traditional methods allow.
Entanglement is often described as one of the most mysterious effects in quantum physics. When two quantum objects are entangled, measurements performed on them can remain strongly linked even when the objects are far apart. These unexpected statistical connections have no explanation in classical physics. The effect can appear as though measuring one object somehow influences the other at a distance. This phenomenon, known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, was confirmed experimentally and recognized with the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics.
Using Distant Entanglement for Precision Measurements
Building on this foundation, a team led by Prof. Dr. Philipp Treutlein at the University of Basel and Prof. Dr. Alice Sinatra at the Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (LKB) in Paris demonstrated that entanglement between quantum objects separated in space can serve a practical purpose. Their work shows that spatially separated but entangled systems can be used to measure multiple physical parameters at once with improved precision. The results of the study were recently published in the journal Science.
“Quantum metrology, which exploits quantum effects to improve measurements of physical quantities, is by now an established field of research,” says Treutlein. Around fifteen years ago, he and his collaborators were among the first to entangle the spins of extremely cold atoms. These spins, which can be imagined as tiny compass needles, could then be measured more precisely than if each atom behaved independently without entanglement.
“However, those atoms were all in the same location,” Treutlein explains: “We have now extended this concept by distributing the atoms into up to three spatially separated clouds. As a result, the effects of entanglement act at a distance, just as in the EPR paradox.”
Mapping Fields With Entangled Atomic Clouds
This approach is especially useful for studying quantities that vary across space. For example, researchers interested in measuring how an electromagnetic field changes from place to place can use entangled atomic spins that are physically separated. As with measurements made at a single location, entanglement reduces uncertainty that arises from quantum effects. It can also cancel out disturbances that affect all of the atoms in the same way.
“So far, no one has performed such a quantum measurement with spatially separated entangled atomic clouds, and the theoretical framework for such measurements was also still unclear,” says Yifan Li, who worked on the experiment as a postdoc in Treutlein’s group. Together with colleagues at the LKB, the team studied how to minimize uncertainty when using entangled clouds to measure the spatial structure of an electromagnetic field.
To do this, the researchers first entangled the atomic spins within a single cloud. They then divided that cloud into three parts that remained entangled with one another. With only a small number of measurements, they were able to determine the field distribution with clearly higher precision than would be possible without entanglement across space.
Applications in Atomic Clocks and Gravimeters
“Our measurement protocols can be directly applied to existing precision instruments such as optical lattice clocks,” says Lex Joosten, PhD student in the Basel group. In these clocks, atoms are held in place by laser beams arranged in a lattice and serve as extremely precise “clockworks.” The new methods could reduce specific errors caused by how atoms are distributed within the lattice, leading to more accurate timekeeping.
The same strategy could also improve atom interferometers, which are used to measure the Earth’s gravitational acceleration. In certain applications, known as gravimeters, scientists focus on how gravity changes across space. Using entangled atoms makes it possible to measure these variations with greater precision than before.
Your fireplace may be doing more harm than you think

Adding a log to a glowing fireplace on a cold winter night often feels comforting and harmless. However, new research from Northwestern University shows that burning wood inside homes plays a much larger role in winter air pollution across the United States than many people realize.
The study found that even though only 2% of U.S. households use wood as their main source of heat, residential wood burning is responsible for more than one fifth of Americans’ winter exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
These microscopic particles are small enough to travel deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream. Long term exposure has been linked to serious health problems, including heart disease, lung disease, and premature death. Based on their analysis, the researchers estimate that pollution from residential wood burning is associated with about 8,600 premature deaths each year.
Urban communities face the greatest risks
One of the study’s most unexpected findings is where the greatest harm occurs. People living in cities are affected more than those in rural areas. The health impacts also fall disproportionately on people of color, who tend to burn less wood but experience higher exposure levels and greater health risks from wood smoke. The researchers point to higher baseline mortality rates and the lasting effects of past discriminatory policies as key factors behind this disparity.
The findings suggest that reducing wood burning inside homes could significantly lower outdoor air pollution, leading to major public health benefits and potentially saving thousands of lives.
The study was published on Jan. 23 in the journal Science Advances.
“Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases,” said Northwestern’s Kyan Shlipak, who led the study. “Studies have shown consistently that this exposure leads to a higher risk of death. Our study suggests that one way to substantially reduce this pollution is to reduce residential wood burning. Using alternative appliances to heat homes instead of burning wood would have a big impact on fine particulate matter in the air.”
Why home wood burning is often overlooked
Wildfire smoke often dominates public attention, but pollution from everyday home heating rarely receives the same scrutiny.
“We frequently hear about the negative health impacts of wildfire smoke, but do not often consider the consequences of burning wood for heat in our homes,” said Northwestern’s Daniel Horton, the study’s senior author. “Since only a small number of homes rely on wood burning for heat, facilitating a home-heating appliance transition to cleaner burning or non-burning heat sources could lead to outsized improvements in air quality.”
Horton is an associate professor of Earth, environmental and planetary sciences at Northwestern’s Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, where he directs the Climate Change Research Group (CCRG). Shlipak is an undergraduate in mechanical engineering at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and a member of the CCRG.
Mapping pollution neighborhood by neighborhood
For decades, air quality research and regulation have focused mainly on emissions from vehicles, power plants, agriculture, industry, and wildfires. In this study, the researchers turned their attention to a less studied source of pollution: wood burning in homes, including furnaces, boilers, fireplaces, and stoves.
The team began by collecting residential wood burning data from the National Emissions Inventory (NEI), a detailed database maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The NEI estimates emissions using information from household surveys, housing characteristics, climate conditions, and appliance types.
The researchers then applied a high resolution atmospheric model to simulate how pollution travels through the air. This model incorporates weather patterns, wind, temperature, terrain, and atmospheric chemistry to estimate changes in air quality over time.
“Wood burning emissions enter the atmosphere, where they are affected by meteorology,” Horton said. “Some emissions are considered primary pollutants, such as black carbon, and some interact with the atmosphere and other constituents, and can form additional, secondary species of particulate matter pollution.”
To identify detailed pollution patterns, the team divided the continental United States into a grid made up of 4 kilometer by 4 kilometer squares. For each grid square, they calculated how much pollution was produced each hour, how it moved through the air, and where it accumulated or dispersed. This approach allowed the researchers to pinpoint pollution hotspots that would not appear in broader city or county averages.
The model was run twice, once including residential wood burning emissions and once without them. By comparing the two results, the researchers determined that residential wood burning accounts for about 22% of wintertime PM2.5 pollution. This makes it one of the largest single sources of fine particle pollution during the coldest months of the year.
Vulnerable populations bear the burden
The analysis showed that wood smoke pollution is especially harmful in urban and suburban areas, where population density, emissions patterns, and atmospheric movement combine to increase exposure. In many cases, smoke produced in suburban areas drifts into nearby city centers, where fewer homes burn wood but many more people live.
Cities that are not typically associated with wood burning can also be affected during cold snaps, recreational burning periods, and when smoke travels long distances through the atmosphere.
“Our results suggest that the impacts of residential wood burning are primarily an urban and suburban phenomenon,” Shlipak said. “This finding underscores the public health relevance of this pollution. We estimate that long-term exposure to emissions from wintertime wood burning is associated with approximately 8,600 deaths per year, and this estimate does not account for particulate matter exposures in other seasons.”
To understand who faces the greatest risks, the researchers combined their pollution estimates with U.S. census data and mortality statistics at the census tract level. They found that people of color experience higher exposure and greater health harms despite contributing less to wood burning emissions. In the Chicago metropolitan area, for example, Black communities face more than 30% higher adverse health effects from residential wood burning compared with the citywide average.
“While a lot of emissions from residential wood burning come from the suburbs, pollutants emitted into the air don’t typically stay put,” Horton said. “When this pollution is transported over densely populated cities, more people are exposed. Because people of color tend to be more susceptible to environmental stressors due to the long tail of past discriminatory policies, we estimate larger negative health outcomes for people of color.”
“People of color face both higher baseline mortality rates and higher rates of exposure to pollution from wood burning,” Shlipak said. “However, people of color are correlated with lower emissions rates, indicating that a large fraction of this pollution is transported to these communities, rather than emitted by them.”
The researchers note that the study focuses only on outdoor exposure to wood burning pollution. Health effects linked to indoor exposure to particulate matter were not included, even though they also pose serious public health risks.
The study, “Ambient air quality and health impacts of PM2.5 from U.S. residential wood combustion,” was supported by the National Science Foundation (award number CAS-Climate-2239834).
‘Heading football likely to have contributed to McQueen’s brain disease’
An inquest concludes that “it is likely that repetitive head impacts, sustained by heading the ball while playing football, contributed to the CTE” which was a factor in the former Scotland footballer’s death.
‘I spent £2,000 on one event’: Why Gen Z is obsessed with Hyrox
How young millennials and Generation Z – people in their twenties to early forties – have become obsessed with this fitness craze.
Thousands of children facing ‘catastrophic’ waits for NHS community care
A quarter of the 300,000 children waiting for community NHS care have spent more than a year waiting.
There Are Clear Body Language Signs Someone Thinks You Are Annoying
We’ve all been there: mid-story, mid-vent, mid-enthusiastic ramble, and suddenly the other person’s energy shifts. Their smile fades. Their eyes wander down to their phone. Their whole body seems to quietly scream: “Please stop.”
Most of us don’t realise when we’re annoying someone. We just think we’re being ourselves.
We might think we’re offering the type of advice our spouse really needs to hear right now. We think sharing our story from last night’s gym session is just as funny to our friend as it was to us. Or we might (wrongly) assume that filling the silence with the latest story about our cat is a welcomed icebreaker for our co-workers in the break room.
Advertisement
But what might feel normal or relieving to us can feel like irritation to another.
The thing about annoyance is that it’s rarely announced out loud. People – whether on the playground or in the office – are often too polite to say, “Hey, you’re annoying me right now.” Instead, it shows up through subtle changes in posture, facial expressions, tone and attention.
While we might not always be liked by everyone, which is totally normal, if we’re not quick to notice the signs that we’re annoying someone, we might continue not reading the room and further alienate the people around us.
According to the licensed psychologists HuffPost spoke with, these quiet cues are often more honest than words. Here are the body language signs to watch for when you’re annoying someone.
Advertisement
Their face gives them away
Not everyone has a poker face – no matter how hard they might try.
“Annoyance may first appear in a person’s face,” says Dr. Michele Leno, a licensed psychologist and host of Mind Matters with Dr. Michele.
Subtle eye-rolling, a sudden blank expression or looking away while you’re talking – these are all red flags that you’re annoying someone.
“When someone is irritated, their nervous system activates a mild fight-or-flight response,” Leno explained. “Micro-expressions – like an eye roll – are quick, unconscious ways the body tries to release tension.”
Advertisement
In other words: even if they’re still nodding politely, their face may already be telling you how they really feel.
They look at their phone
This one is pretty much universal. “When someone looks at their phone, it often shows boredom or annoyance,” Samantha Whiten, a clinical psychologist, told HuffPost. “They’re using a socially sanctioned way to get out of talking to you and hoping you take the hint.”
In today’s always connected culture, phones provide an easy escape. But when someone is genuinely interested in you, they stay engaged, and if they do get interrupted, they usually apologise and try to come back to the conversation.
Advertisement
If you continuously encounter someone gazing down at their phone when you open your mouth, chances are, you annoy them.

Dejan Marjanovic via Getty Images
They start distancing themselves
If someone is annoyed with you, you may feel them pulling away – emotionally, physically or both.
“Did they walk away when you entered the room? Did they indirectly refuse to engage in conversation with you? If so, you may annoy them,” Leno said.
Advertisement
They may avoid you by declining invitations that include you. Texts might become sporadic or ultimately leave you on read.
It’s hard not to take this behaviour personally, but as Leno notes, people typically act like this when they feel “overwhelmed, and in an effort to protect their personal space, they keep their distance.
A person’s emotional bandwidth may not accommodate anxiety-producing situations, so they remove themselves as needed.”
Advertisement
They sigh, fidget or take deep breaths
Those exaggerated inhales you heard from your co-worker when you started talking about your latest Netflix obsession? They’re not random.
“We need to protect our well-being at all times,” Leno said. So behaviours like deep breaths, fidgeting or shifting in place, she said, are all physical attempts to calm the nervous system and reset when tension is building, aka when you’re annoying someone.
If someone suddenly starts sighing or picking at their fingernails while you’re talking, it may be their body signalling overload.
Advertisement
Their arms cross over their chest
Seeing someone with crossed arms doesn’t necessarily mean you have to hike up the thermostat at work – it’s often about protection.
“This is a defensive posture,” Whiten said. “The person is trying to put up a virtual shield.” If crossed arms are paired with looking away, a lack of smiling or silence, it’s a strong sign the person feels intruded on or overwhelmed.
That’s your cue to give them space.
Their tone changes
Listen not just to what a person says to you but how they say it.
“If a person goes from calm and engaged to flat or high-pitched, they may be attempting to reduce tension,” Leno said. Short answers like “yes” or “no” when more detail would normally come are another giveaway. This goes for text messages too.
Advertisement
Tone shifts often happen when someone wants out of a conversation but doesn’t feel comfortable saying it.

Brasileira via Getty Images
They yawn – openly
Most adults can usually control their yawns. So when someone yawns right in front of you?
“Some part of them is hoping you’ll notice and disengage,” Whiten said. ”If someone combines this with looking away or an unsmiling or quiet demeanour, it is best to conclude that you may be irritating or overwhelming them, and move to talk to another person.”
Advertisement
What to do if you realise you’ve annoyed someone
First: pause. “Listen without offering advice or judgment,” Leno said. “Ask what is needed instead of assuming.” Simply slowing down and being curious can de-escalate tension quickly.
The simplest tool to become more self-aware of your behaviour? Watch how people respond to you.
“The best way to understand how your behaviour affects others is to notice their reactions to your presence,” Leno said.
And if you suspect something is off, a gentle, honest conversation can help clear the air.
At the same time, it’s OK to accept that not everyone will love your communication style. “It’s important to be authentic,” Leno said. “If someone is unreasonably irritated by who you are, it may be healthier to create distance than to contort yourself to please them.”
Advertisement
Andy Burnham ‘Disappointed And Concerned’ By Move To Block His Bid To Stand As Labour MP

Andy Burnham has said he is “disappointed” by the decision to block him from standing as a Labour candidate in the upcoming by-election and “concerned” about the repercussions.
The mayor of Greater Manchester threw his hat into the ring for the Gorton and Denton by-election on Saturday after Andrew Gwynne stepped down.
Advertisement
But, as the directly elected mayor, Burnham – who served in the cabinet under Gordon Brown – had to seek approval from the National Executive Committee (NEC) to be considered as a Labour candidate.
Eight of its 10 members voted against allowing him to stand, with only one member voting in favour of letting him run and one abstaining.
The prime minister was among those who voted to stop Burnham’s bid to return to Westminster.
Burnham is often seen as a challenger to Keir Starmer and allies feared that his presence in Westminster may have destabilised the prime minister’s government.
Advertisement
In a post on X, the Labour politician wrote: “I am disappointed by today’s decision and concerned about its potential impact on the elections ahead of us.
“To whoever is Labour’s candidate and to our members in Manchester and Tameside: you will have my full support in this fight and I’ll be there whenever you need me.”
He added: “Tomorrow I return with full focus to my role as Mayor of GM, defending everything we have built in our city-region over many years. I decided to put myself forward to prevent the divisive politics of Reform from damaging that. We are stronger together and let’s stay that way.”
Advertisement
But the NEC’s move has sparked a major backlash from within the Labour Party, with one MP telling HuffPost UK that many backbenchers feel it was a “cowardly” decision.
Senior Labour figures including energy secretary Ed Miliband and deputy Labour leader Lucy Powell had previously said they thought Burnham should be allowed to run.
The Labour Party issued a statement defending the NEC on Sunday, saying allowing Burnham to run would have triggered an “unnecessary election for the position of Greater Manchester mayor”.
Advertisement
It claimed this “would have a substantial and disproportionate impact on party campaign resources ahead of the local elections and elections to the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Senedd in May”.
It added: “Although the party would be confident of retaining the mayoralty, the NEC could not put Labour’s control of Greater Manchester at any risk. ”
Housing and local government secretary Steve Reed told the BBC that it was not the right time for Burnham to return to parliament.
Advertisement
He said the NEC voted against it because “of the huge inconvenience to two million voters across Greater Manchester of having a by-election for a new mayor”.
“I know that’s disappointing for Andy,” Reed said. “But it’s good news for the people of Greater Manchester because he’s been doing such a good job as the mayor there.”
He claimed “voters don’t like elections that come mid-term” adding that “in due course, I look forward to seeing Andy back in parliament”.
Advertisement
The Ripeness Level Of Your Avocado Actually Matters For Your Health – Here’s How
Most people judge an avocado’s readiness by one simple test: a gentle squeeze. Too firm, and it stays on the counter. Too soft, and it risks going straight into the bin. (Yes, we agree, the window between those two states often feels comically short. But that’s fodder for another story).
Beyond texture and taste, though, the ripeness of an avocado actually shapes how your body digests it, absorbs its nutrients, and even responds metabolically after you eat it.
Advertisement
In fact, as avocados ripen, their internal chemistry changes. Fats become more accessible, carbohydrates shift form, and antioxidant levels rise and fall. According to doctors and nutrition experts, these changes can influence digestion, blood sugar response and nutrient absorption.
That’s all to say that an avocado’s health benefits aren’t fixed but actually evolve as the fruit matures – just as is the case with bananas.
Why avocado ripeness matters
When an avocado ripens, “there is a shift in the nutritional structure and absorption,” said Dr. Parth Bhavsar, a board-certified family medicine physician who specialises in nutrition.
Advertisement
Specifically, as time goes by, enzymes break down cell walls, which makes fats easier for the body to absorb. This also affects carotenoids like lutein and beta-carotene, whose bioavailability improves in a fat-rich environment.
Dr. Cintara Bradley, a resident physician at Sonoran University of Health Sciences Medical Center who specialises in nutrition, lifestyle management and digestive health, noted that ripening significantly changes lipid content, carbohydrate composition, amino acid availability and phenolic compounds.
While avocados remain nutrient-dense throughout their life cycle, the ratios of fats, fibre and antioxidants shift quickly as they approach and move past peak ripeness.
Advertisement
Unripe avocados
Unripe avocados are firm and difficult to eat for a reason. When an avocado hasn’t ripened yet, your body has a harder time breaking it down. At this stage, much of the starch hasn’t converted into more usable forms, the fats aren’t as easy to absorb, and the fibre is tougher.

Getty Images
Bhavsar explained that unripe avocados contain resistant starch and “less accessible lipids,” meaning your body can’t easily access all of the calories and nutrients during digestion. In practical terms, you’re getting less nutritional payoff from each bite.
Advertisement
There may be a small metabolic benefit, though. “Resistant starch resists the metabolic process and the post-prandial increase of blood sugar concentration,” Bhavsar said. Put simply: Unripe avocados digest more slowly and may help prevent blood sugar spikes after eating. He added that this process can support insulin sensitivity and gut bacteria balance.
Dr. Patrick Ryan, a primary care and sports medicine physician in San Diego and the founder of telehealth platform HemyRX, similarly noted that unripe avocados may help with glycemic control because glucose is absorbed more slowly.
Still, most experts say this stage isn’t ideal for everyday eating. Bhavsar pointed out that slow digestion and gastrointestinal discomfort can make unripe avocados unpleasant or hard on the stomach. And according to Bradley, unripe avocados don’t offer meaningful advantages over ripe ones, especially since avocados already have a low glycemic load, regardless of ripeness.
Advertisement
Barely ripe avocados
As avocados begin to soften, they also become easier for your body to handle. The tough starches start breaking down and the healthy fats inside the fruit become easier to absorb.
As Bhavsar put it, “resistant starch is gradually turning into non-resistant fats, while your levels of soluble fibres are increasing.” This means your body can access more nutrients without losing the fibre that helps you feel full.
Ryan explained that barely ripe avocados are easier to digest than unripe ones, while still slowing how quickly sugar enters the bloodstream. They also contain less fat than fully ripe avocados, which can be helpful for people who want the benefits of avocado without feeling weighed down.
Advertisement
Bhavsar added that avocados that gently yield when pressed can help control appetite and keep blood sugar steady. Because they are digested more slowly, they help prevent blood sugar spikes while still allowing your body to absorb key nutrients.
Fully ripe avocados
Fully ripe avocados give your body the most nutrients it can actually use in the easiest way for your body to absorb them, Bhavsar said.
According to Ryan, ripe avocados also help your body take in antioxidants and fat-soluble vitamins, which support heart health, balance hormones and reduce inflammation.
Advertisement
Bradley pointed out that antioxidants, especially phenolic compounds, are highest when the avocado is perfectly ripe, before enzymes start breaking them down. Other vitamins and minerals, like potassium, magnesium and folate, stay steady, while fats become fully available.
Because the fat is fully accessible, calories are higher at this stage. Ryan noted this matters for people who are watching calories and Bhavsar said portion size is key (though even fully ripe avocados are still healthier than refined carbs), but one thing is clear: Avocados that are fully ripe are at their peak in terms of flavour and variety of nutrients offered.
Overripe avocados
Once an avocado passes peak ripeness, oxidation begins to affect its nutritional quality. Bhavsar explained that while fats, fibres and minerals remain, antioxidant properties decline. “Browning signals an indicator that polyphenols, with potential health benefits, are being broken down and will instead ferment,” he said.
Advertisement
Bradley noted that oxidised fats contribute to bitterness while antioxidant levels diminish dramatically. However, if an avocado has only minor browning and no mould or odour, it can still be safely used in smoothies or baking.
So, is there an ideal ripeness?
The answer depends on your goals. Bhavsar suggested that “lightly to gently ripe” avocados optimise fat assimilation and satiety, while barely ripe may be preferable for gastrointestinal regulation.
Ryan agreed that ripe avocados work best for most people, but noted that blood sugar control or calorie awareness may influence preference.
Advertisement
Bradley, on the other hand, said that peak ripeness offers the best balance of nutrient density, bioavailability and enjoyment.
In short, it’s clearly not just about flavour: the ripeness of an avocado actually changes how (and what!) your body digests and absorbs.





