Vladimir Putin seemed to overlook the international arrest warrant out against him while calling for everyone to adhere to the law.
The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for the Russian president in March 2023 over his alleged involvement in the abduction of children from Ukraine.
Advertisement
The Court’s 124 signatory countries are therefore expected to arrest him if he ever sets foot on their land – meaning his travel plans have been significantly scaled down over the last 18 months.
Russia itself is not a signatory of the statute and has denied the claims against Putin.
Still, according to Russian state news agency TASS, the president claimed: “We stand united in advocating for the establishment of a just and democratic world order founded on genuine equality and adherence to international law, free from all forms of discrimination, coercion, and sanctions pressure, settling regional conflicts and crises, as well as combating the terrorist threat.”
Speaking in his message to participants of the Russia-Islamic World Strategic Vision Group events in Malaysia, he also emphasised the “great importance” on strengthening ties with Muslim countries.
Advertisement
He continued: “In the current challenging international climate, it is significant that our positions on key regional and global issues are largely aligned.”
It’s worth noting that Putin is currently offering up asylum to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian dictator who was toppled at the weekend – Moscow propped up his brutal regime for years.
Putin is also allied with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un who is known for oppressing his civilians.
Advertisement
The Russian president himself is thought to have fixed the recent election so he could secure a fifth term in office.
Putin has also brushed off the impact of the arrest warrant on his life recently, claiming in October: “Decisions of this kind are very easy to circumvent, it is enough to sign an intergovernmental agreement and that’s it – the jurisdiction of the ICC will be limited.”
While this is said to be the happiest time of year, with many of us putting up our Christmas decorations and enjoying a festive night out or two, it doesn’t quite have the same magic for those in poverty.
In fact, the latest government figures show that 159,380 children across England are spending this winter in temporary accommodation – the highest number on record.
Advertisement
A figure that is a 15% increase on last year.
Housing charity Shelter says: “The figures also show that there are 9,550 families with children stuck in B&Bs and hostels. Government rules say families should only be put in B&B accommodation as a last resort and only for a maximum of six weeks.
“B&Bs and hostels are considered some of the worst type of temporary accommodation as families are often cramped into one room, forced to share kitchens and bathrooms with strangers and where children have no space to play and are unable to have friends over.”
“They had cockroaches, mice, beetles, bedbugs and a bee infestation”
As part of Shelter’s collaboration with B&Q, people who have stayed in temporary accommodation shared their stories, which inspired a range of charity baubles.
Lauren, who was made homeless with her three sons says: “It was one room with one double bed and two single beds. It had a tiny fridge freezer, which kept defrosting and you couldn’t really store anything in it, and a microwave which was absolutely filthy, and we didn’t use”
Advertisement
Aimee and her two young children faced similar issues of cleanliness in their hotel room. She explains: “On the day we moved in we found old chips and ketchup stuck to the windowsill. They had cockroaches, mice, beetles, bedbugs and a bee infestation. The water came out of the tap a dirty colour and the toilet backed up.”
Sam and his family were actually placed in a flat but it was overrun with rodents and wasn’t fit to live in. He says: “We’ve got mice. We’ve got rats in the ceiling – running, fighting in the middle of the night. We had no electricity for two weeks, had no shower for about a month. It feels like I’m in a prison sometimes.”
Temporary accommodation is often unsanitary
Shelter’s ‘Living in Limbo’ report surveyed over 1,000 people living in temporary accommodation.
The report found that a devastating four in 10 reported problems with damp, mould or condensation, over a third had issues with insect or animal infestations and over half of parents say that living in temporary accommodation has harmed their child’s health.
“Utterly unacceptable”
Polly Neate, Chief Executive of Shelter, says: “It is utterly unacceptable that so many families will spend the festive season homeless and trapped in overcrowded, damp, unsafe temporary accommodation.
“Sky high private rents combined with a dire shortage of genuinely affordable social homes has caused homelessness to spiral and sadly it’s children who are paying the price. Too many are growing up sharing beds with siblings, in one-room hostels infested with cockroaches, bedbugs, and rats, in conditions that harm their health and futures.”
Advertisement
To find your nearest B&Q to purchase your tree and help donate towards B&Q and Shelter’s shared mission, visit their website.
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
As Christmas draws near, I’ve been feeling the panic pretty much anyone who’s hosted a big dinner has experienced ― how am I meant to cook everything I need to when I’ve only got one oven?
Advertisement
Don’t get me wrong, I love my slow cooker (where I’m planning to make some spiced apple red cabbage on the day), and I’m not completely against steamed veggies.
But with Yorkies, stuffing, pigs in blankets, roast parsnips, spuds, and some kind of fowl in the mix, I genuinely started to lose sleep over how it was all going to come together.
That was, of course, before I spotted this £12 universal oven rack from Amazon, which instantly made all my fears look ridiculous.
It’s got adjustable arms that you can tighten or loosen with the bolts attached to both sides of the rack.
Advertisement
You don’t need any tools to tighten or loosen it ― a simple twist with your thumb and forefinger is more than enough.
It extends from 36cm to 59cm, making it perfect for most ovens (it only took about a minute to make it fit mine).
After I’d fitted it into my oven, my first step was to try a dry run of the Crimbo dinner (basically, I did a roast).
I’ll be honest; I was worried there wouldn’t be enough height in my oven to properly accommodate everything I wanted to include, but by placing the top and bottom racks at the highest and lowest ridges respectively, I got away with a lot more than I thought I would.
So it’s pretty safe to say I’m sold on the addition ― you can nab your own here, if you like.
He said they had “forgotten, to paraphrase JFK, that you choose change, not because it’s easy, but because it’s hard”.
That prompted Dave Penman, general secretary of civil servants’ union the FDA, to write to the PM accusing him of a “Trumpian” attack on his members.
A Whitehall source told HuffPost UK that senior ministers are “doing the rounds to show love” in their departments in an attempt to repair the damage caused by the prime minister’s comments.
One civil service source said: “We’re tired of being criticised in public and thanked in private – that’s what happened with the last government.”
Advertisement
In a further attempt at improving relations with officials, Starmer today wrote a letter to civil servants thanking them for their efforts.
He said: “From my time as Director of Public Prosecutions, I know first-hand just how fortunate this country is to have a civil service that is admired across the world.
“I saw it every day, I depended on it every day, I was proud to be part of it every day. And from all I have seen during my first five months as prime minister, my appreciation for your service to this country has only grown.”
But responding to the PM’s letter, Dave Penman said it did not go far enough.
He said: “I’m sure civil servants will welcome the message from the prime minister, recognising the challenges the civil service faces as it strives to deliver the government’s agenda and their shared desire to deliver better public services.
“But he needs to to go further. As minister for the civil service, the prime minister should not underestimate the damage his remarks last week made.
Advertisement
“If he is to deliver his vision for change, he needs to inspire, not denigrate the civil service.”
Speaking after Syrian rebels ousted Bashar al-Assad, who had ruled Turkey’s neighbour since 2000, Erdogan heaped praise on Russia’s authoritarian leader.
Advertisement
He said: “Now, there are only two leaders in the world. They are myself and Vladimir Putin.
“I am not saying this because one of them is me. But I have been in office for 22 years, nearly as long as Mr Putin. The rest are gone.”
My two kids, my husband and I were at an outdoor picnic table at Roberta’s pizza on a chilly day in Brooklyn when our then-7-year-olddeclared that they were nonbinary.
The kids had finished eating their plain cheese pizzas and were goofing around, giddy to be eating at a restaurant after endless pandemic meals at home. In the middle of the hand-slapping game they were engaged in, my oldest said something to my youngest about them becoming a dad one day. Our 7-year-old let out an exasperated yell, like they had hit some kind of boiling point.
Advertisement
“I’m not a he or a she!” they said, their fists clenched. “I’m nonbinary, call me they.”
They had been telling us that they’d felt “a little like a boy and a little like a girl” since they were about 3, but this was the first time they put a label, and a pronoun, to that feeling. My husband and I were both blown away and very proud of them for so confidently asserting their young identity.
My family lives in a picturesque Brooklyn neighbourhood, where many of the historic brownstones have rainbow flags in windows. Most people here would probably identify as being liberal-leaning. However, even before this moment, we had already experienced some of the challenges of raising our gender nonconforming child in a world that is so wedded to binaries.
When our child was in second grade, we were all surprised at how easily the other kids in class adapted to using their pronouns (they/them/theirs) correctly. One teacher even told me that when someone accidentally misgendered our child, using a pronoun that does not reflect their gender identity, the other students were quick to correct them. The parents of those kids from school, on the other hand, have had a harder time accepting our child’s identity.
Our child is often misgendered. People look at them, with their long hair, pink-hued outfits and rainbow Crocs, and assume they’re a girl. And as progressive as Brooklyn can seem, the reality is that many of the everyday spaces our family encounters are gendered ones, from play spaces to dance classes. When our child took ballet a few years ago, the teacher often asked the little girls to imagine they were fairies or princesses but wasn’t quite sure what to say to my child. One year, our child’s teacher struggled to switch to “folks” or “friends” instead of addressing the students as “boys and girls.” Our local school waits until kids are in fifth grade before introducing students to the topic of gender identity.
Advertisement
And it was only as recently as 2021 that New York City public schools were finally required by law to designate all single-occupancy bathrooms as all-gender bathrooms. Attitudes across the country toward the LGBTQ+ community seem to only be getting worse. In fact, in the last year alone we’ve seen an explosion of anti-LGBTQ+ laws aimed at limiting trans and nonbinary people’s rights and safety. In 2024, a Manhattan parent-led advisory board called on the Department of Education to revisit guidelines on trans girls’ sports participation. Most recently, President-elect Donald Trump has been spreading rhetoric about schools performing gender-affirming surgeries on students.
As a preschooler, our child enjoyed some of their brother’s toys but mostly gravitated toward what would be considered “girly” toys and interests — princesses, every character in the ”Frozen” movie, playing dress-up with tutus and dresses — and preferred female friends as playmates. When they asked us to draw a picture of them, they would get frustrated.
“No, draw me as a girl,” they’d say.
Some days they’d say they wished they could grow up to be a girl. After a while, it was clear to us that our child’s identity lived somewhere in between the two poles of “male” and “female” and that those coordinates were fluid.
Sometime around third grade, I noticed their classmates had begun separating into groups of male and female. I saw it at drop-off and pickup, where the girls would congregate in circles on the sidewalk to chat while the boys would start roughhousing and talking about soccer. Our child gravitated toward the girls’ circles, as this group shared similar interests (imaginary play, an obsession with cats, a love of stuffies and schoolyard dramas).
When we talked with them about their friendships at school, they said they were “friends with everyone.” But when it came to playdate requests and stories about who they hung out with at recess, it was mostly girls. I also noticed how the moms of the girls would plan playdates and sleepovers for their kids, and how we were never a part of those invitations. It was hurtful. I’ve wondered how it must feel for my child to hear about these gatherings knowing they hadn’t been included or to wonder why I was unable to make certain playdates they had requested happen.
Advertisement
I knew it wasn’t the kids who were responsible for their own social calendars. My child seemed to be very well-liked by their peers. Their friends would come up to me, arms linked with my child’s, asking when they could have a playdate. Again and again, I reached out to parents to plan get-togethers for our kids, and again and again, there was always a reason why it couldn’t come to fruition. (There were, however, a few exceptions, and those are the parents I value dearly.) I began to think it was me.
Parents in our grade tend to do “girls’ parties” and “boys’ parties” as a way to make things more wallet (and apartment) friendly. Sometimes my child is invited to both, as the only nonbinary kid at an all-boy or all-girl party. One day last year, as the kids trickled out of the side doors of the school and found their respective grownups along the sidewalk, one of my child’s friends came running to her mom to ask why my child hadn’t been invited to her birthday. The mom smiled at me apologetically and said to her daughter, “I thought you wanted just girls.”
“They’re not a boy or a girl,” the girl responded. “They’re my friend.”
Photo Courtesy Alexis Barad-Cutler
The author and her child taking a walk.
A few weekends ago, my child was finally invited to their first slumber party. They had been talking about this party since before school ended last year and had been constantly asking me if I had received the invitation yet. The birthday girl had invited them multiple times and repeatedly told them about the activities she had planned for her soiree (face masks, a movie, waffles the next morning).
For the first time, I wondered if this really was an oversight and not a slight, so I did something I’d never done before. We’d recently sent out electronic bar mitzvah invitations for our older child and about 40 of them had not been received, having gone straight to spam. It took everything in me to send a text to the birthday girl’s mothers, asking if the same thing might have happened with their invitation.
Advertisement
“We’re sorry,” the moms wrote back. “We were trying to keep it small, because we can’t fit everyone in our apartment. But we love your child, and would love it if they could come.”
I was embarrassed that this wasn’t a case of “it got lost in the mail” but very grateful for their graciousness and the invite. I’d never seen my kid pack their fuzzy, bear-shaped travel bag so fast as they did the morning of the sleepover party. As we walked the dog and picked up a chocolate macaroon at the cafe behind our apartment, they told me that they had a plan for when it came time to change into pajamas.
“I’ll change in the bathroom,” they said. “To give the girls privacy.” That night I was with friends at a sushi restaurant, celebrating my husband’s birthday. I kept looking at my phone with dread, imagining the text or call from the parents telling me that it wasn’t working out and that we’d have to come get them. I couldn’t stop worrying about potential moments when my child’s gender identity could make them, or the others, uncomfortable.
The next morning, they came home from their sleepover giddy (and surprisingly well rested). They showed me the pink and purple tie-dye shirt they’d made and told me about how great a movie “A League of Their Own” was even though they “hate baseball” (their words).
“Oh, and mom,” they added. “Everyone took turns changing in the bathroom by themselves. Not just me.” When they said this to me, it confirmed that this had indeed been on their mind that night. And, it meant something to them that the other kids at the party decided to change in the privacy of the bathroom. I imagine it helped my child not feel singled out and made them feel even safer.
Advertisement
At 10 years old, my child is super confident, comfortable in their body and still very much gender nonconformingin the ways they express themselves, their hobbies and their interests. They no longer want to wear dresses but, rather, dress for ultimate comfort. They intend to keep growing out their already long hair. And they still tell us that they feel like both a boy and a girl.
Any parent will tell you that the minute you think you have one thing down, another one comes up that you’d never expected. As a parent of a nonbinary kid, and especially as we enter the middle school years with our child, I know these curveballs will become even more complex and with bigger potential consequences. Trans and nonbinary folks suffer disproportionately from mental health issues. A 2020 survey led by Trevor Project found that more than half of the trans and nonbinary youth (ages 13 to 24) respondents seriously considered attempting suicide. On the legislative level, our country is becoming ever more dangerous for LGBTQ+ kids. There have been more anti-LGBTQ+ bills introduced in statehouses this year than in each of the previous five years. It can feel bleak out there at times.
When we became parents, my husband and I knew very little about the huge spectrum of ways a person can express their gender identity. We didn’t even know that being gender nonconforming was an option until our child embodied it for us, and pushed us to learn and challenge our preconceptions and biases. We’ve met with child therapists, we’ve read a lot of articles and books, and we’ve spoken to other parents of trans and nonbinary kids. We continue to be open to the possibility that things might shift for our child as they mature.
As with so many things, change starts in the home. My hope is that other parents can also learn to take some cues from their kids, who I think have a lot to teach all of us about inclusion and acceptance.
The government has just appointed a former Labour MP to be the anti-corruption champion.
Baroness Margaret Hodge, who now sits in the Lords, will fill the position which has been vacant since June 2022.
Her predecessor, John Penrose, resigned over Boris Johnson’s role in the partygate scandal after a series of gatherings in Downing Street were found to have breached Covid lockdown rules.
Advertisement
Hodge “will work with parliament, the private sector and civil society to help drive delivery of the government’s priorities to clamp down on corruption and the organised criminals who benefit from it, helping to deliver safer streets and secure borders”, according to the Foreign Office.
Hodge has spent much of her career in the Commons campaigning against both domestic and international corruption.
News of her appointment comes as part of a new crackdown from foreign secretary David Lammy.
He has just announced up to £36m in support for the National Crime Agency’s international corruption unit over the next five years, and sanctions to hit the illicit gold trade.
Lammy said: “This government will make the UK a hostile environment for the corrupt and their ill-gotten gains as we put national security as a foundation of our Plan for Change and decade of national renewal.”
Advertisement
Hodge said: “After years of campaigning on the issue, I feel privileged and delighted to be able to work as the Government’s champion, combatting corruption and the illicit finance that flows from it, both at home and abroad.
“The time has now come to put an end to dither and delay. We must take determined and effective action and I look forward to playing my part in that work.”
Labour MP Joe Powell, chair of anti-corruption and responsible tax all party parliamentary group, said he “warmly welcomes” Hodge’s appointment today.
He added: “Oligarchs, kleptocrats, and those exploiting tax havens will sleep less easily tonight.
“This role is pivotal in the fight against corruption, and Margaret’s decades of tireless work exposing corruption and dirty money bring immense credibility to this effort.”
Neither Liz Truss nor Rishi Sunak appointed a new figure to replace Penrose after his dramatic resignation as the anti-corruption tsar more than two years ago.
Advertisement
In a scathing letter to Johnson, Penrose called on the then-PM to quit after the civil service’s partygate probe concluded that “senior leadership” at the top of government was to blame for the scandal.
The-then Tory MP said: “You have breached a fundamental principle of the ministerial code – a clear resigning matter.
“But your letter to your independent adviser on the ministerial code ignores this absolutely central, non-negotiable issue completely.”
He added: “As a result, I’m afraid it wouldn’t be honourable or right for me to remain as your anti-corruption champion after reaching this conclusion, nor for you to remain as prime minister either.”
Labour’s majority in parliament is a ticking “time bomb”, according to a brutal new report – and not because a threat from the right.
Keir Starmer’s party may have won by a landslide in July, taking 411 seats while the Tories languish on just 121, but new findings from Labour-linked think tank Compass claims it still offers a weak mandate for change.
Advertisement
After all, it was a shallow victory as Labour actually won just a third of the popular vote, and that poses a major threat further down the line.
On Thursday, pollsters at Find Out Now put Nigel Farage’s populist Reform Party in second place behind the Tories with Labour in third – just five months after voters hit the ballot box.
But, Compass’s new findings, first reported in the Guardian, have found Labour should be more concerned about their lack of voter loyalty – just two in five who backed Labour in July said they would consider themselves to be Labour supporters – than pressure from the right.
That’s because around 48% of Labour’s voters in July said they would be likely to vote Green or Lib Dem in the future, compared to 23% who said they were more likely to go to Reform or the Tories.
Advertisement
Compass’s report Thin Ice claimed: “They won [in Red Wall seats] because they were not the Tories, because Tory voters stayed at home and because Reform split the regressive vote.
“The 2024 general election was a one-off event in which unprecedented Tory ineptitude met almost unparalleled Labour discipline, but without any deep expression of what, if any, change Labour was offering.”
The pollsters said: “The timidity of this strategy, resting on ‘not being the Tories’, is atime bomb.”
Compass’s director Neal Lawson told the Guardian Starmer should look to base a coalition on the progressive majority to bolster support.
Otherwise, he warned, “if Labour fails to deliver in government, its huge but fragile majority will crumble, sending us on a bullet train to the populist right.”
Advertisement
The report comes after a tumultuous first few months in office for Labour, including backlash to cost-cutting policies like changing winter fuel payments for pensions.
Starmer attempted to “relaunch” his government with six new missions last week.
He wanted to turn the focus onto pursuing clean energy, building more homes, recruiting more police officers, putting a greater emphasis on early years education, introducing higher living standards and reducing NHS waiting lists.
The prime minister spoke on Sunday, after rebel forces ousted the country’s authoritarian leader by seizing the capital, Damascus.
Starmer also called for civilians to be protected – the UK had been evacuating its own citizens in the days leading up to peak of the rebellion.
Advertisement
According to PA news agency, he said: “The developments in Syria in recent hours and days are unprecedented, and we are speaking to our partners in the region and monitoring the situation closely.
“The Syrian people have suffered under Assad’s barbaric regime for too long and we welcome his departure.
“Our focus is now on ensuring a political solution prevails, and peace and stability is restored.
“We call on all sides to protect civilians and minorities, and ensure essential aid can reach the most vulnerable in the coming hours and days.”
His remarks echo the comments from deputy prime minister Angela Rayner this morning.
Speaking to Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, she said: “Well, the situation looks very serious and if the Assad regime has fallen, then I welcome that news.
Advertisement
“But what we need to say is a political resolution in line with the UN resolutions. And we need to see civilians and infrastructure protected.
“Far too many people have lost their lives – we need stability in that region.”
She continued: “If Assad has fallen and that regime is over, I welcome that.
“He wasn’t exactly good to the Syrian people.
“So we want to see a political resolution so that we can get that stability for Syrians and make sure that they have their infrastructure so that they have a political government there that is working in the interest of the Syrian people.”
Assad has fled Damascus but his exact whereabouts remain uncertain.
Some reports suggest he may try to flee to Russia as Vladimir Putin is a key ally and his regime was propped up by the Kremlin until this latest rebellion.
It’s also not clear who will fill the power vacuum now, although one of the leading rebel groups originated in Al-Qaeda.
Starmer is set to travel to the Middle East this week to meet with the UAE and Saudi Arabia, although his trip was planned before Assad’s regime collapsed.
“When you’re talking about greatness, and when you’re talking about greatness for the 21st century specifically, no one has a longer or fuller track record than Beyoncé.”
That’s how Billboard announced the musical icon as the greatest pop star of the 21st century this week. The declaration came on the heels of the publication announcing its runner-up pick, Taylor Swift, who earned the No. 2 spot for catapulting modern pop stardom to heights many didn’t think were possible across her 17-year (and counting) career. The contest was close, given Swift’s astronomical album sales, streams and touring numbers, but in the end, Billboard explained that Beyoncé topped the list “based on her full 25 years of influence, evolution and impact.”
Advertisement
Of course, the result didn’t sit well with Swifties, who argued that their idol’s accomplishments could’ve satisfied Billboard’s top-spot criteria. And it didn’t take long for members of the Bey Hive to chime in with their own retorts to defend their Queen Bey.
For weeks, the two fan bases had speculated about the music outlet’s hotly anticipated rankings, reigniting the tiresome debate that pits the superstars’ legacies against each other. The discussion hit a fever pitch last year while Beyoncé and Swift were both riding high on their economy-boosting international concert runs (Renaissance and the Eras Tour, respectively), which, according to Pollstar, were the two highest-grossing tours of 2023. And the discourse was reignited after the tours hit the big screen last fall, despite the two singers supporting one another at their Hollywood premieres.
That should’ve been enough to end all catty chatter among fans. But after Billboard’s rankings, now feels like as good a time as any to retire the Beyoncé vs. Taylor Swift argument that’s way past running its course.
Yes, it’s easy to compare the two global juggernauts when none of their peers have reached the same level of cultural dominance in this century. In nearly any arena that matters for pop stars — historic music sales, record-breaking numbers, awards acclaim, etc. — Swift and Beyoncé almost always lead the pack. However, contrary to what stan culture believes, numerous instances prove that Swift and Beyoncé are incomparable in the lanes that make them all-time greats.
Advertisement
Swift’s unequivocally sharp pen has made her one of the most illustrious songwriters of her time, which she demonstrates time and time again with every chart-topping album she releases. Her successful crossover from country to pop superstardom proved her talents were as boundless as her ambitions, charting a path to hit-making, award-winning success. To this day, Swift, according to Forbes, is the only woman in music to build a billion-dollar fortune solely from her musicianship. Even with a later start in the millennium, she’s achieved what many in the pop world can only dream of.
Over the last 20-plus years, Beyoncé, meanwhile, has far exceeded what anyone could’ve expected from the former frontwoman of a ’90s and early aughts girl group, Destiny’s Child (one of the most successful in history). Her talents aren’t limited to music — her roles in films like “Dreamgirls” and “Cadillac Records” have proven that. But as many well know, Beyoncé’s name will be forever etched in the history books for consistently raising the bar for musical excellence (live performances, outstanding visuals, genre-bending projects, you name it), no matter the genre. Her ability to disrupt industry conventions has inspired many, including Swift, to be originators in their own right. But what truly sets the legend apart from Swift and everyone else is that she’s remained the standard of pop stardom for decades and is still reaching above and beyond to cement her legacy.
It does us all a disservice to try and assert why Beyoncé and Swift are better than one another when they’re two vastly different symbols of greatness. Where one dominates with statistics and chart numbers, the other has had an immeasurable cultural impact. But as with many polarising conversations about music, it’s more fun to fuel a narrative that keeps these two icons in constant competition, even when they oppose it.
Swift said it best in her 2023 Time Person of the Year profile: “Clearly it’s very lucrative for the media and stan culture to pit two women against each other, even when those two artists in question refuse to participate in that discussion.”
Advertisement
The media and stans will likely cash in on that discourse again for the 2025 Grammy Awards — where Swift and Beyoncé are both nominated for record, song and album of the year — but don’t count on the pop stars to feed the frenzy.
As history has shown, Swift and Beyoncé have held nothing but reverence for each other’s work over time. Last year, in an Instagram post, Swift praised her contemporary for being “a guiding light throughout my career” who’s also “taught me and every artist out here to break rules and defy industry norms.” Beyoncé was just as generous with her words years prior when she held space for Swift to finish her acceptance speech at the 2009 Video Music Awards — where Kanye West infamously interrupted Swift to argue that Beyoncé should’ve won instead.
Even when people expect Swift and Beyoncé to pick sides against each other, they show that they know better than to entertain such negativity — it’s served their groundbreaking legacies well. When will fans finally learn to do the same?