Rishi Sunak endured a torrid grilling from journalists as he launched the Tories’ underwhelming election manifesto.
The 76-page document only contained one major new policy – a plan to abolish National Insurance contributions for the self-employed.
Advertisement
The party has also vowed to cut another 2p off the overall rate of National Insurance, despite previous reductions doing nothing to improve their poll ratings.
But the prime minister risked a backlash from Tory right-wingers for refusing to commit to removing Britain from the European Convention on Human Rights.
In a clear sign that he expects to lose on July 4, Sunak begged voters not to hand Keir Starmer a “blank cheque” in government as he once again repeated his hotly-contested claim that Labour will put up taxes by £2,000 per household.
Although he got a warm reception from the Tory ministers and supporters gathered at Silverstone Grand Prix race track, the PM was monstered during a question and answer session with reporters.
Advertisement
ITV political editor Robert Peston said: “Tories in government since 2010 have been pushing up the tax burden to levels we haven’t seen since the late 1940s. Why should anyone believe you when you say you’re going to cut tax?”
BBC political editor Chris Mason told him: “For much of the last 18 months, you’ve tried everything to try and revive Conservative fortunes and not much appears to have worked.
“Could we rename this document as your last chance saloon? What is in this to shift things that perhaps haven’t shifted up until now?”
Sunak told him the country had “turned the corner” thanks to his leadership.
He said: “There is a clear choice at this election. We are the only party putting bold action on the table that will transform our country.
“Labour have nothing to say about the problems our country faces and how best to address them. Nothing. Keir Starmer is asking for a blank cheque and he will not tell people which taxes he is going to put up that are ultimately going to cost them £2,000.”
Advertisement
Ben Riley-Smith, political editor of the Daily Telegraph, asked the PM: “What do you say to those who say the manifesto isn’t ambitious enough and this won’t be a game-changer?”
Sky News political editor Beth Rigby said: “A recent poll shows only one in six voters thinks you won’t raise their taxes, compared with one in four for Labour.
“Labour’s more trusted on tax than you at the moment – that’s your record as chancellor and now prime minister. I’m sure that’s a disappointment to you.
“Haven’t you blown it now, whatever you say?”
But Sunak insisted he was “very proud” of his record as chancellor, pointing out that he had brought in the furlough scheme during the Covid pandemic.
Advertisement
He said: “We will always be there to protect this country through difficult times.”
Labour campaign chief Pat McFadden said: “This Conservative manifesto is a recipe for five more years of Tory chaos.
“After 14 years in power, the prime minister’s desperate manifesto is stuffed full of unfunded spending commitments. The prime minister that was brought in to be the antidote to the chaos of Liz Truss has instead become the next instalment of the same thing.”
Brooklyn Peltz Beckham has spoken out amid the ongoing discussion about Hollywood nepotism.
Although conversations about industry nepotism are not exactly anything new, the debate blew up in 2022, when New York Magazine ran a feature dubbed The Year of The Nepo Baby.
Since then, a string of public figures who have benefited from their own connections within show business (dubbed “nepo babies” by many) have spoken outon thesubject – the latest being Brooklyn, the eldest son of David and Victoria Beckham.
Advertisement
“I can’t help how I was born,” he told InStyle magazine, ahead of the launch of his new brand Cloud23.
“I couldn’t ask for better parents and I’m just trying to work my ass off and trying to make a name for myself. That’s all I can say, really.”
Brooklyn with his parents Victoria and David Beckham in 2019
Karwai Tang via Getty Images
Throughout his time in the spotlight, Brooklyn has tried his hand at everything from football and photography to modelling. In recent years, he’s focussed on his love of cooking, which has garnered mixed results.
Advertisement
“I always wanted to go the football route,” he explained, noting that he “loved it so much” but “just didn’t have the right head for it”.
“When you’re growing up, especially with the dad that I had, everyone’s like, ‘Oh, the oldest son’s going to be a footballer.’ And I loved it. I really, really, really did, and I miss it so much,” he continued.
“I did football—that didn’t work out. Then I went into photography. I had a lot of fun with that for a few years. And then, what else did I do? I’ve always done a bit of modeling.
“[My parents] didn’t care what I did or what I wanted to do. But, they were just like, ‘As long as you’re nice, you’re humble, and you work hard and you put your head down, that’s the most important thing. You can do whatever you want and it’s whatever you choose to do—try and be the best at that’.”
The Beckham family pictured together in October 2023
HENRY NICHOLLS via Getty Images
Advertisement
On critics of his food credentials, Brooklyn said: “I’m so used to it. It makes me… I kind of like it, in a way, just because it makes me really want to prove to people…
“Until two years ago, I didn’t know what the hell I was doing. I think with all the rubbish I get, my mum’s just like, ‘Prove them wrong. Never respond to that rubbish, just prove them wrong’.”
Brooklyn previously hit back at his detractors in 2022, insisting: “I always wish them well, the haters. I’m just doing what I love doing, staying healthy, being happy, and that’s what it is.”
He added: “I don’t understand why people still think that I try and act like a professional, because I’m absolutely not.
“I’ve always said, this is the very beginning. I have a lot to learn. I’m probably never going to stop learning.”
Advertisement
Doubling down during a 2023 interview with Insider, he insisted: “I have more important things to worry about than people saying a little bit of rubbish about me. My message to them is to keep writing whatever they want to write. There are always going to be people out there who try and pull you down.
“I’m doing my thing and working my bum off. So they can keep writing what they want, but it’s not going to bother me — I’m just going to keep doing my thing.”
You’ve said your vows, celebrated with your loved ones and now all that’s left to do after your wedding is, uh, prepare for divorce?
According to a barrister at 4PB, Rhiannon Lloyd, this is exactly what you should be doing and, in fact, it’s the most romantic thing you could do for one another as a married couple.
Advertisement
Speaking exclusively with HuffPost UK, Lloyd said: “The reality of divorce, its brutality, cost and the damage it can inflict, if not handled correctly, on children and families is something any prospective spouses should seriously think about.
“The importance of planning for the eventuality of a split, and minimising it’s impact on you and any future children is underestimated.”
Lloyd wisely added: “What could be more romantic than trying to ensure that you have the best possible chance of remaining a positive presence in each other’s lives and the lives of your future children post any future divorce?”
Well, yes.
How to financially plan for a potential divorce
The barrister recommends that couple start a ‘divorce fund’ to financially see them through any divorce proceedings and ensure that neither party are left out of pocket.
Advertisement
Lloyd explained: “Whereas prenups plan for management of asset division, they don’t ordinarily address contribution to a fund to manage the cost of any eventual divorce process.
“This is now changing and many couples are opting to make joint (or sole) contributions into a divorce fund as well. A fund is set aside, earmarked for the costs ( or even settlement) of any future divorce often in line with the prenup’s provisions.”
As for how much you should put in a divorce fund? Well, Lloyd says that a ‘sensible’ starting point is £100k. Quite unfathomable to most of us, especially during a cost of living crisis.
However, while this sum may make you gulp, Lloyd warned: “It’s important to point out though that even in modest asset cases costs can spiral into the hundreds of thousands when people litigate unreasonably.”
Eye-watering.
As for the how, Lloyd said: “Any fund would have to be an Escrow or joint mandate account where neither party could withdraw without the consent of the other.
Advertisement
“It would also be sensible, either as part of a prenup, or by way of a separate written agreement, to set out the terms under which either party could utilise sums from the fund, how any excess was to be treated and the parties’ intentions in respect of the fund generally.”
Strictly Come Dancing bosses have confirmed that Giovanni Pernice will not be returning to the show for this year’s landmark 20th series.
Giovanni’s future on the show has been in doubt for a number of weeks now, with the BBC currently investigating complaints made about him by a number of his former celebrity partners.
Advertisement
Prior to this, it was reported by The Sun that the Italian dancer had made the decision to bow out after 10 series, citing an undisclosed “source”, who claimed the former champion had chosen to leave Strictly as a result of the “scrutiny” he had found himself under.
On Monday afternoon, the BBC confirmed the line-up of this year’s Strictly professionals, with Giovanni’s name absent from the list.
Giovanni previously told his Instagram followers: “You will be as surprised as I am that allegations have been made about my dance teaching methods in the media this week. Of course, I reject any suggestion of abusive or threatening behaviour, and I look forward to clearing my name.
“Those who have followed my journey on Strictly Come Dancing over the last decade will know that I am passionate and competitive. No-one is more ambitious for my dance partners than me. I have always striven to help them be the very best dancers they can be. This has always come from a place of love and wanting to win – for me and my dance partners.”
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the BBC has also issued a rare statement alluding to the matter, which said: “It is a longstanding position that the BBC does not comment on specific matters related to individuals,” a BBC representative said. “Nor ordinarily, would we comment on whether we are reviewing any individual complaints.
“Recently, we have seen a number of media reports about a high profile show. We would urge people not to indulge in speculation. Anyone involved in a complaint has a right to confidentiality and fair process.
“If a complaint is made to the BBC, we assess and take any necessary steps to establish the facts, whether there is a case to answer, and, if appropriate, what action should be taken.”
The statement – which did not mention Giovanni, any of his former partners or Strictly Come Dancing directly – continued: “This is all within the context of the BBC having duties of care to everyone linked to a complaint – that applies to those that have raised the complaint and to those that have been complained about.
Advertisement
“Whilst we know our shows have been positive experiences for many of those who have taken part, we will always look at any issues raised with care, fairness and sensitivity to everyone concerned.”
The cast of the Strictly professionals tour in 2022
Dave J Hogan via Getty Images
The rest of last year’s Strictly dancers will all be back for the upcoming season, including reigning champion Vito Coppola and runner-up Nikita Kuzmin, whose future on the show was also previously in doubt following his appearance on Celebrity Big Brother back in March.
Also returning to the show will be Amy Dowden, who missed much of the 2023 run while she underwent cancer treatment.
Because of the surprising nature of Naomi’s baby news, it led some to speculate whether she may have adopted or used a surrogate.
Advertisement
While she previously denied the former, she has now confirmed the latter to be the case in a new interview with The Times.
During her interview with the newspaper, Naomi admitted she thinks things in the UK are “slipping back” in terms of progress for minorities.
“I would put it this way: there are definitely groups who are against diversity in any form, whether they’re racist or homophobic, and they are not afraid to be open about it,” she said. “The world is in a culture war. It’s increasingly fragile.”
Naomi added that, as a mother, she feels “fear for the future”, noting: “My babies are everything to me.”
Advertisement
Asked whether she used a surrogate, she responded: “I did. I hope for a better world for my children. They are 110 per cent my priority. I have to be there for them on their first day at school.”
“I have heard a lot of young girls saying that it is too expensive to have children and they may not want them, and I have said, ‘You will change your mind. You will want to be a mum’,” Naomi continued.
“I understand economically it is tough. But my mum had nothing and she made it work. It’s worth it. It is so amazing.”
Naomi previously introduced her daughter – whose name she has not disclosed publicly – to the world in a cover photo-shoot for British Vogue magazine.
Advertisement
“She is the biggest blessing I could ever imagine. It’s the best thing I’ve ever done,” she told the magazine at the time.
“I always knew that one day I would be a mother, but it’s the biggest joy I could ever imagine. I’m lucky to have her and I know that.”
Following the birth of her son last year, Naomi described him as a “gift from God” while telling her Instagram followers: “It’s never too late to become a mother.”
Mel Stride clashed with Trevor Phillips this morning after the Sky News presenter asked whether Rishi Sunak left last week’s D-Day commemoration early because he was “just not bothered” about those who died on the beaches at Normandy.
The prime minister’s election campaign has been turned upside down by his decision to return to London rather than attend an event alongside other world leaders on Thursday afternoon.
Advertisement
Instead, foreign secretary David Cameron was left to represent the UK alongside US president Joe Biden, German chancellor Olaf Scholz and French president Emmanuel Macron.
Phillips told Stride the controversy “just makes the country embarrassed”.
He said: “The reason this has become such a big deal is this – the prime minister is never slow to boast about his facility with numbers.
“In the battle of Normandy, the Americans lost 29,000 soldiers, the Canadians 5,000, the French 12,000. We won’t even talk about what happened to the Germans.
“Did the prime minister not know those numbers, or did he just not care? That’s the question.”
As Stride tried to avoid the question, Phillips asked: “Was he just not bothered?”
The minister replied: “No, absolutely not. Look at Rishi Sunak’s record …”
But Phillips interrupted: “No, look at what he did on Thursday.”
Stride hit back: “You’ve got to give me a chance to answer your question.”
But Phillips told him: “You’re not answering my question.”
The minister replied: “I haven’t had a chance to, actually. When it comes to what happened, he has made an unequivocal apology. I know he will be feeling this very deeply, and let me just talk about his record and how he stands up for this country.”
Advertisement
David Cameron took Sunak’s place on Thursday afternoon.
LUDOVIC MARIN via Getty Images
Phillips then hit back: “You’ve said that twice already, and the question I’m asking you is look at that picture as 60 million Britons do, and ask yourself the question that they are asking. Did he understand the weight of this event or did he not care enough?”
Stride insisted “this man cares very deeply about our country and I know that because I know him well.”
Meanwhile, the minister also had to insist that Sunak will not resign before election day on July 4.
Phillips asked him: “Would it not be a courageous and moral act for him to announce that he knows he is leading his party to defeat, partly because of his own actions and his own shortcomings, and that he will not step aside to save seats which won’t be saved if he stays for the next four weeks?
“Is he going to lead you into this election?”
Stride replied: “Absolutely, and there should be no question of anything other than that because what matters now is there’s a clear choice for the British people.”
But on BBC1 this morning, Laura Kuenssberg said viewers “might imagine that you are trying, not very subtly, to emphasise the prime minister’s immigrant heritage”.
Advertisement
Farage insisted he was referring to the PM’s “class and privilege”.
But work and pensions secretary Mel Stride said Farage’s remarks were “deeply regrettable”.
In their interview, Kuenssberg told Farage: “I want to ask you about the prime minister’s early exit from the D-Day commemoration this week.
“After that, you said that he wasn’t patriotic and you said that Rishi Sunak didn’t understand our history and our culture’. What did you mean by that?”
Farage replied: “Absolutely right. He should have known in his heart that it was right to be there. I was there, I’ve been raising money for some weeks to send veterans back to Normandy.
“The vast majority of people in Britain felt this commemoration was important, and the last opportunity to honour those remnants that are still alive.
Advertisement
“By the way, I know what your question is leading at. Forty per cent of our contribution in World War One and World War Two came from the Commonwelath. He is utterly disconnected by class, by privilege, from how the ordinary folk in this country feel.
“He revealed that, I think spectacularly, when he left Normandy early.”
Laura: “But Mr Farage, when you say ‘our culture’, I think many of our viewers might imagine that you are trying, not very subtly, to emphasise the prime minister’s immigrant heritage.”
Farage replied: “I just made the point, 40% of our contribution in two wars came from the Commonwealth. Clearly, Mr Sunak doesn’t understand that.”
Asked what he thought about Farage’s comments, work and pensions secretary Mel Stride said: “I think they were deeply regrettable comments. I’m not entirely sure he addressed the question you put to him as to what he meant by that.”
Advertisement
He added: “It just seems to be to be an ill-advised thing to have said. I feel very uncomfortable with that.”
Shadow justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said: “This is a classic Nigel Farage trick – lean in just enough to signal a bit of a dog whistle and then lean back and sound perfectly reasonable and say some thing good about the contribution Commonwealth soldiers and ethnic minorities made towards the war effort.
“We can all see exactly what Nigel Farage is doing, he’s got form, it’s completely unacceptable. This is a man who has a track record of seeking to divide communities.”
A Tory minister has been forced to deny that Rishi Sunak will resign before the general election amid the row over his D-Day snub.
The prime minister is under mounting pressure following his decision to leave Normandy early during the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the Allied invasion of mainland Europe during World War 2.
Sunak cancelled media interviews yesterday – a virtually unprecedented move during an election campaign – as the row continued.
That led to speculation that the PM might even quit in order to try to prevent a Conservative wipeout on July 4.
Former cabinet minister Nadine Dorries last night posted on X (formerly Twitter): “Rumours around tonight that Sunak’s about to fall on his sword.”
On Sky News this morning, work and pensions secretary was sent out to defend Sunak, despite admitting he had not spoken to him since the D-day row broke.
Presenter Trevor Phillips asked him: “Would it not be a courageous and moral act for him to announce that he knows he is leading his party to defeat, partly because of his own actions and his own shortcomings, and that he will not step aside to save seats which won’t be saved if he stays for the next four weeks?
“Is he going to lead you into this election?”
Stride replied: “Absolutely, and there should be no question of anything other than that because what matters now is there’s a clear choice for the British people.”
Breakfast is the most important meal of the day. You’ve heard it, I’ve heard it, my stomach’s heard it, too. But my stomach doesn’t care, and I’m not alone. According to the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, a quarter of Americans skip breakfast.
So what are we doing to ourselves? Well, it depends on whom you ask.
A strong case for eating breakfast.
According to Dr. Emily Cooper of Cooper Center for Metabolism, you aren’t doing yourself any favors by skipping breakfast. “When people skip breakfast, a good percent will start disruption in insulin secretion,” Cooper said. In other words, low blood sugar, which can cause fatigue, brain fog and “exaggerated emotional response,” also known as a crappy mood. Having a meltdown? Maybe you just need a smoothie, according to Cooper’s thinking.
Advertisement
People have many reasons for skipping breakfast — they’re rushing to get out the door in the morning, they don’t have reliable food access or maybe, like me, their circadian rhythm is such that their ghrelin — that’s the hunger hormone — doesn’t kick in till later. Cooper doesn’t care. Skipping breakfast is a deal-breaker for her patients.
She practices what she preaches. She’d already had “two pieces of good local bakery sourdough whole grain toast with tahini and apricot jam” and was enjoying a bowl of raisins before 7 a.m. when I spoke to her. That’s complex carbs, protein, iron and healthy fats.
But not every breakfast choice wears that kind of halo. Sugary cereal and processed meats, for example, deliver calories but few nutrients. Even so, Cooper says bad breakfast beats no breakfast.
“If you don’t get enough to eat early in the day, ghrelin levels rise later. Your body is trying to make up for all the stuff you’ve missed,” she explained.
Advertisement
You’re hungry, even hangry, which can lead to making poor choices. You’re liable to grab something that gives you the immediate lift you need, maybe an iced Frappucino, extra whip. So here you are mid-morning, loaded with calories, fizzing with caffeine and sugar, but without enough nutrients to sustain you. You’re a hot mess for your 3 p.m. Teams meeting.
Keep that roller-coaster pattern up, and, studies indicate, including one from Cleveland Clinic, you’re looking at potential weight gain and diabesity — obesity-caused diabetes. That morning toast sounding better to you?
Iryna Veklich via Getty Images
Caffeinated beverages have been shown to be good for brain health.
Breakfast’s effect on your brain cognition.
Dr. Jonathan Rosandhas seen those studies, too. As co-founder of Massachusetts General’s McCance Brain Care Center and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, it’s his business to understand factors that may lead to depression, stroke and dementia. Does skipping breakfast make the list?
When I spoke to Rosand, he had eaten his oats this morning but said it’s OK that I hadn’t. He said, “I don’t know. There’s a lot of evidence” between missing breakfast and cognition. In other words, skipping breakfast won’t make me stupid. Unlike Cooper, he focuses not on the when but the what: “Getting more stuff that’s good for you — a diet rich in vegetables and leafy greens,” as well as other foods linked to brain health, including fatty fish, berries and walnuts, which are rich in omega-3s and — caffeine fans, rejoice! — coffee and tea.
Advertisement
Check in with yourself, Rosand advises. “How do you feel? Are you cloudy? Clear?” If you’re feeling fine, don’t worry.
What about young people?
But Rosand suggests that breakfast isn’t a bad idea for children, teens and anyone with health issues. Science backs him up on this. The American Academy of Pediatrics has found that kids who eat breakfast typically learn better at school, have fewer behaviour issues and buck the teen obesity trend by maintaining a healthy weight.
Despite that, many of Yasi Ansari’syounger patients regularly skip breakfast. For Ansari, a registered dietitian nutritionist in Los Angeles, it’s a concern. “The problem with not getting our needs met, especially in the adolescent years, is that it can lead to unhealthy eating habits, unhealthy relationships with food,” she said. “Not getting their needs met during this time period can also put individuals at risk of stunting their growth and not being able to perform their best in the classroom or out on the field.”
But, she admitted, the data is inconclusive. When working with patients, she considers other factors: “Are they meeting enough of their nutrition needs throughout the rest of the day? Do they make time for movement in their day? Are they getting enough sleep? Is there a work-life balance? What do foods at lunch and dinner look like?” Ansariadvises eating “at regular intervals,” but just as important is to “listen to what your body needs.”
Rosand agrees. “Listening to your appetite — that’s helpful,” he said. “Much of what you’re inclined to do for your body is probably OK.”
Advertisement
What about intermittent fasting? Isn’t that supposed to be healthy?
And now the big IF is intermittent fasting. This eating trend du jour indicates fasting, skipping meals or stretching out the time between them forces your body to work more efficiently, so you’re running on ketones and fatty acids for energy, not glucose (sugar). Most people choose to stop eating around 8 p.m. and not eat again until noon the following day, meaning they skip breakfast.
Intermittent fasting isn’t proven for weight loss, but studies like one in the New England Journal of Medicine show it can benefit the body. It decreases the risk of major diseases, including diabetes, reduces inflammation, and potentially leads to living healthier and longer.
JGI/Jamie Grill via Getty Images
The American Academy of Pediatrics has found that kids who eat breakfast on average learn better at school, have fewer behavior issues and buck the teen obesity trend by maintaining a healthy weight.
Does skipping breakfast mean you’re in the ketone-burning club? Quite possibly. And it’s the most common way to practice intermittent fasting. Just don’t tell Cooper. “I’ve never been a fan. All these kinds of trends people get into — nothing good comes of it. It doesn’t make metabolic sense.”
What about breakfast skippers?
If you’re a member of the breakfast-skipping tribe, you’re in good company.
St. Thomas Aquinas wasn’t a morning meal fan either. He believed breakfast led to gluttony, one of your seven deadly sins, and was immoral. Pete Wells, the New York Times restaurant critic, doesn’t think breakfast is immoral, but he just doesn’t eat it. Stands to reason. He tastes food — a lot of it — for a living. It’s not what he wants to do on his time off.
Advertisement
If you’re expecting a lecture from nutrition and public health expert Marion Nestle, guess again. Nestle doesn’t do breakfast, either. “I prefer eating when I’m hungry, and I rarely get hungry before 10:30 or later,” she said.
As for all those studies talking about breakfast being the most important meal of the day, Nestle advises reading the fine print. Who’s funding the study? Money for The International Breakfast Research Initiative, an exhaustive database of breakfast patterns and outcomes, came from Cereal Partners Worldwide in the U.S. and Canada by General Mills.
The decision is up to you.
To eat breakfast or not to eat breakfast?
“One of the challenges when counselling people on a diet is our all-or-nothing culture,” Rosand said. “That’s not how we live.”
Do you want to start eating breakfast? Great! “Make small changes over the course of weeks, months,” Rosand added. “Look for ways to improve.”
Still not sold on the benefits of breakfast? That’s fine, too. “The goal is to feel comfortable, take better care of ourselves,” Rosand said. “Let’s give ourselves a break.”
Glen Powell is the leading man dominating Hollywood right now.
After a string of high-profile performances in Top Gun: Maverick, Anyone But You and his latest film Hit Man, which is now streaming on Netflix, it seems we’re truly reaching peak Glen popularity.
But while the actor has only been able to show off his leading star charisma in the last few years, he’s actually been on the acting scene longer than you might realise.
Advertisement
Here are 11 roles you’d probably forgotten seeing him in…
Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over (2003)
Glen Powell in the third Spy Kids movie
Watching the Spy Kids films is a core childhood memory for many of us, so it’s no surprise we all lost our minds after finding out that Meghan Trainor was married to an all grown up star Daryl Sabara. But did you remember that Glen Powell was also part of the franchise?
That’s right, Glen actually landed his first film role at the age of 13 playing “Long-Fingered Boy” in the hit kids’ franchise. He once told The Hollywood Reporter that shooting for the film was “one of the best days of my whole life”.
Fast Food Nation (2006)
Advertisement
Glen was still a teenager when he appeared briefly in Richard Linklater’s satirical mockumentary about the fast food industry, which featured an impressive cast of Bruce Willis, Greg Kinnear and Paul Dano.
While he only played a minor character, Glen clearly impressed the director as it marked the first in a series of collaborations together (more on those later!) including his new film Hit Man.
“He’s the guy in all his movies where you go, ‘Hey, who’s that guy?’” the director recently shared (as reported by the Austin Chronicle), as Glen was being inducted into the Texas Film Hall of Fame.
The Great Debaters (2007)
The Great Debaters was one of Glen’s earliest films
Harpo Productions
Directed by and starring Denzel Washington and produced by Oprah Winfrey, The Great Debaters told the story of the first African-American debate team to compete against a white college in the South, ultimately going on to face Harvard. Glen appeared briefly towards the end of the movie as one of the (immaculately groomed, it has to be said) Harvard Debaters.
Advertisement
Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Glen revealed that, just moments before the red carpet for the film (his first ever, at that) it was Denzel who helped convince him to move out to Los Angeles, and really give acting a shot.
CSI: Miami (2009)
A guest role in CSI is nothing to turn your nose up at as a rising actor in Hollywood.
Glen appeared briefly on the 12th episode of season seven of CSI: Miami, titled Head Case. He played a military man called Logan Crawford, who was the only surviving member of a family tragedy.
The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
Glen Powell faces up to Bane in The Dark Knight Rises
Warner Bros
What actor wouldn’t want the honour of being on the receiving end of a terrifying Tom Hardy tantrum? You might remember Glen played a stock trader in Christopher Nolan’s third Batman film, who takes a bit of a beating from Bane.
Advertisement
“As soon as Bane showed up on set, there was this electricity of being a part of something that you know everybody in the world wanted to be a part of,” Glen told IMDB.
The Expendables 3 (2014)
Can you spot Glen Powell in this sea of A-listers?
Nu Image/Millennium/Lionsgate/Kobal/Shutterstock
Given the roles we all know him for now, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that Glen Powell was cast in the most Hollywood action franchise there is.
Glen Powell in his second Richard Linklater film Everybody Wants Some!!
Advertisement
Now, if you’re a Richard Linklater fan, you’re probably already well aware that Glen played Finnegan in the director’s film about an off-campus college house of unruly baseball players, set in the 1980s.
Clearly, it was just another stepping stone before he finally took the lead in the director’s most recent film
Hidden Figures (2016)
Glen Powell with Octavia Spencer, Taraji P. Henson and Janelle Monáe in Hidden Figures
The film followed the three African-American mathematicians who played pivotal roles in a historic space launch back in 1962.
Advertisement
But the film isn’t all happy memories for Glen, after he recently claimed that he “puked” in the bushes after his first rough cut viewing because he worried he’d ruined the movie.
The Guernsey Literary And Potato Peel Pie Society (2018)
Glen Powell and Lily James share a kiss in The Guernsey Literary And Potato Peel Pie Society
Glen Powell and Guernsey aren’t two things our mind would immediately put together, but with Mike Newell (Four Weddings And A Funeral, Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire) directing this adaptation of the 2007 bestselling book, it was a big draw for the actor.
He played Mark Reynolds, an American who is engaged to Juliet Ashton (played by Lily James), before she gets drawn into the society and their relationship falls apart.