‘My Boys, 8 And 11, Still Bath Together – My Friends Think It’s Inappropriate’

A parent has asked if they should be enforcing separate bath times now their sons are eight and 11 years old – and it’s proven to be a divisive topic.

Writing on Mumsnet’s Am I Being Unreasonable forum, the parent said their sons “adore each other and are pretty much inseparable, which also includes bath time”.

“I have never had a problem with them bathing together as that’s what they choose to do, but some of my friends who have children of a similar age have started making comments that it isn’t appropriate,” they said.

In particular, the parent’s friends have taken issue with the eldest son sharing a bath because he is approaching the age of puberty (the average age for girls to start puberty is 11, while for boys it’s 12).

The parent pointed out that they’re not making their children share a bath – they simply like bathing together. “I give them [the] option to bathe alone if that’s what they’d prefer, but they don’t want to,” they added, before asking if they should be enforcing separate baths.

Some commenters were of the opinion that their comes a certain age – usually when kids start secondary school or hit puberty – where it might be wise to start implementing privacy around bathing.

“I think this is [a] time where as their parent you start encouraging them to bathe alone. I do think it’s too old now and your eldest needs to start having some privacy,” said one respondent.

Another said: “I’d be enforcing separate bath times. I’d do it in a gentle way rather than make them feel they were wrong for it but they do need to know that bathing together isn’t appropriate.”

But there were also many commenters who didn’t see any issue. “Personally I think as long as they are happy, it is fine,” said one respondent.

“In the UK we are quite conservative about nudity, which influences people’s views. It would seem odd if you prevented then having a bath together when they are used to it. I imagine your eldest will decide to stop soon enough without your interference.”

Another said: “I imagine your elder son will decide soon enough that he doesn’t want to share anymore. I think if the boys are both happy with it then it’s fine.”

Is there an age when siblings should stop bathing together?

First up, consider safety

There is no strict clinical or legal age when children should start bathing independently, Dr Patapia Tzotzoli, clinical psychologist and founder of My Triage Network, told HuffPost UK.

“Readiness depends more on maturity, motor skills, and safety awareness than age, and parents should adjust for each child’s needs,” she explained.

In the UK, safety guidance states children under the age of five must never be left alone in the bath. Yet “between about five and eight years, parents need to stay nearby for supervision”, warned Dr Tzotzoli.

You can be gradually handing over tasks, such as teaching them how to properly wash themselves and wash their hair, during this time.

“The goal is to build autonomy and competence over time. Parents can start by framing bath time as their private time, important for relaxation and self-care. They should talk about privacy and use correct anatomical terms when discussing private parts with their children,” said Dr Tzotzoli.

“By around 8-10 years, many children can manage the full routine independently with an adult nearby and periodically checking on them,” the psychologist said.

A survey found the average age that adults believed a child could bathe alone was 7.5 years old.

Former sex education teacher Kathleen Hema suggests parents can start offering separate baths once safety isn’t a concern. “This age can be different for each child and when parents feel there is no safety risk,” she explained.

See how your kids feel about it

Once they’ve reached an age where safety is less of an issue, it’s worth telling your children they can bathe separately if they want – perhaps to gauge how they would feel about it, and whether they would want to.

“There’s nothing inherently wrong with siblings bathing together. Nor is there anything wrong with siblings bathing separately,” Hema told HuffPost UK.

“If the kids aren’t respecting each other during bath time (not respecting boundaries), then there is a reason to end it. Or if one kid says they want to bathe separately, then there is a reason to end it.”

It’s important to set boundaries from a young age around not touching other people’s genitals – including siblings.

“Ensuring safety and comfort for all siblings is the parent’s job,” Hema continued. “Parents can check in with their kids by reminding them they can shower separately whenever they want.

“They can also discuss privacy and what that means to them and let their kids know that they can request privacy at any time.”

Erica Miller, clinical psychologist and director at Connected Minds NYC, previously told Scary Mommy in her experience, children “begin to express more of a desire for privacy around 10 years old”.

Although she noted “this may come earlier for girls than boys who often begin puberty earlier”.

Ultimately, the time when siblings might no longer want to have a bath together can depend on a range of things – a child’s comfort levels, maturation, desire for more privacy, or simply wanting more space (it can be a tight squeeze in the tub as kids get bigger!).

If a child decides they no longer want to bathe with siblings, the important thing for us to do as parents is respect that wish.

Share Button

Trump Hints He Will Reward Putin’s Invasion By Demanding Ukraine Give Up Land

President Donald Trump hinted he would demand that Ukraine give up territory seized by Russian dictator Vladimir Putin during his three-year invasion and once again blamed Volodymyr Zelenskyy for getting invaded.

“I get along with Zelenskyy, but, you know, I disagree with what he’s done, very, very severely disagree. This is a war that should have never happened,” Trump said at a White House press conference of Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and his recent statement that he cannot legally cede territory.

“I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelenskyy was saying, ‘Well, I have to get constitutional approval,’” Trump said. “I mean, he’s got approval to go into war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap because there will be some land-swapping going on.”

Trump announced last week he would host a meeting with Putin in Alaska to broker a peace agreement, and his comments to reporters Monday are the most detailed about his view of what needs to happen to persuade Putin to end the war.

His insinuation that Zelenskyy was somehow to blame for Putin’s invasion was a repeat of his attacks on the Ukrainian president during his Oval Office visit in February.

“What you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country,” Trump told Zelenskyy then. “You’re not winning this. You have a damn good chance of coming out OK because of us.”

Six weeks later, Trump outright blamed Zelenskyy for starting the war. “You don’t start a war with someone 20 times your size and then hope people give you some missiles,” he said in an Oval Office photo opportunity with Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele.

Trump called the coming summit a “feel-out meeting” and that he would afterward call Zelenskky and America’s NATO allies in Europe, who have since the 2022 invasion been eager to counter Russia and help Ukraine and even more so since Trump returned to office in January.

He added that his discussions with Russia and others led to his belief that Ukraine would have to give away land to end the war. “I know that through Russia and through conversations with everybody,” Trump said.

Trump’s special envoy, his friend from New York real estate days Steve Witkoff, met with Putin last week and apparently misunderstood what Putin was saying. Witkoff reported back that Putin was willing to give up two Ukrainian regions and keep a third, when in fact Putin’s offer was to hang on to all three in return for stopping his attacks.

Trump on Monday also repeated his lie that the US under former President Joe Biden had given far more help to Ukraine than had Western Europe. “Biden approved $350 billion. Europe has spent $100 billion,” he said.

In reality, Europe has provided more assistance to Ukraine from the start, both in weapons and economic help.

Trump is scheduled to go to Alaska on Friday for his meeting with Putin, his first such summit with him since 2018, when in Helsinki he said he took the word of the former KGB agent over his own intelligence agencies about Russia’s work to help Trump win the 2016 election.

On Monday, though, Trump, who is 79, twice conflated Alaska with Russia itself. Alaska has belonged to the United States since 1867, when it was purchased from Russia, then under the rule of Czar Alexander II.

“I’m going to Russia on Friday,” Trump said, explaining his coming trip. An hour later, preparing to leave the podium, he said it again: “We’re going to Russia.”

Share Button

‘Zone Zero’ Exercise Is The Workout You Don’t Even Know You’re Doing – Here Are Its Benefits

Good news for fellow slow runners: it turns out zone two cardio, which sees joggers plod along at a conversational pace, is incredibly good for us.

Professional runners spend about 85% of their training doing that sort of low-impact activity. It puts runners at about 60-70% of their max heart rate.

But if even that sounds a little too much, zone zero movement (yes, really) might be the under-appreciated, super-low-effort way to keep you active without a pricey gym membership or even a pair of trainers.

Never putting your heart above 50% of its max rate, it can be done accidentally – it’s that easy and approachable.

What is zone zero training?

Primary care organisation The Lanby describes zone zero training as a kind of “active rest” – it “aids in active recovery, ensuring your body is ready for the next challenge”.

It means your heart rate never goes above half its maximum level, as we mentioned above. Your max heart rate changes by age: in general, it’s calculated by subtracting your age from 220.

So, say you’re 30 years old. Your max heart rate is around 190; and zone zero training will never see your pulse go above 95 beats per minute.

It can include slow walking, gentle cycling, and yoga. But popping to the shops, doing a bit of light tidying, and pottering around in the kitchen count too.

What are the benefits of zone zero training?

Zone zero training is not only a great way to make exercise accessible to those who might find the idea of a full-on workout a bit much, but active recovery also benefits active people as it helps to flush out waste material that builds up in tired muscles.

Some experts think that those who work out might subconsciously compensate for the added load by not engaging in zone zero moves (like tapping your foot or taking an extra few steps) throughout the day. Remembering to include zone zero work in your routine might help this.

Taking a short stroll after eating, in particular, might help to even out your blood sugar, too. And some suggest that pottering can keep you alive for longer.

What are some examples of zone zero training?

These can include:

  • Stretching at your desk
  • Light walking
  • Yoga
  • Walking meetings
  • Rolling your feet on a roller or ball as you work
  • Gently yoga
  • Slow cycling
  • Tidying
  • Cooking.

Parking a couple more metres away from work than usual or popping to the shops instead of ordering in can all add up.

That’s not to say that zone zero training should replace current health guidelines – the NHS says we should stick to 75 minutes of high-intensity or 150 minutes of moderate-intensity (over 50% of your max heart rate) activity a week.

Not doing so has been linked to shorter, less healthy lives.

Still, going from no activity to some has enormous health benefits too – and whether you find yourself intimidated by intense exercise or are struggling to properly recover from your most hardcore workouts, zone zero may offer an approachable answer.

Share Button

The 1 Response To Have Up Your Sleeve When Kids Say ‘I’m Bored’

Today, 12 August, is the day that kids reach peak school summer holiday boredom, apparently – yet chances are you’ve already heard your fair share of ‘I’m bored’ and ‘can you play with me?’ comments over the six-week break.

If this resonates, parents on Reddit might just have a handy retort to try which can encourage kids to either help tick things off your daily to-do list – or go off and play with something while you get things done.

In a recent post on r/Parenting, a parent of a nine-year-old said if their son isn’t allowed on the Playstation or iPad, “he literally follows us around the house”.

“We suggest all types of things and he doesn’t want to do any of them,” said the baffled parent before listing all the toys available to him. “He just doesn’t want to do anything by himself.”

They asked Redditors (and fellow parents) for tips on how to get their child playing independently – and the top comment has been upvoted over 400 times for good reason.

“When mine follow me around while I’m doing chores, I give them a chore to do,” said the parent of a three- and five-year-old.

“I’ve told them ‘if you keep following me around while I’m doing chores, I’m gonna give you a chore to do’ and when I say that they’ll usually go find something else to do.”

“I do this, too,” said another parent. “Half the time they help. The other half, they pout and storm off into their room. Within 10 minutes or so, they miraculously remember they have toys, crayons, books, and imaginations.”

It turns out this incredibly simple response seems to encourage a lot of kids to find something else to do, sharpish.

“I started doing this when my 6 year old whines about how bored she is. She usually takes off and hides,” said one commenter.

Another affirmed it worked on them growing up: “Was raised on ‘if you tell me you are bored, I’ll find a chore for you.’ Can confirm this works.”

And it turns out getting kids involved in chores could benefit them well into adulthood.

A 75-year study from Harvard found that children who were encouraged to do chores around the house were more likely to be happier as adults, have more empathy towards others, and be more successful in their careers.

Listing the benefits, a paediatrician from Utah – known as TikTok Kid Doc – said “having your children do chores gives them a sense of self-worth and it helps them to realise that they’re contributing to a larger ecosystem”.

“They become more selfless, they become more willing and able to see the needs of other people around them.

“Chores also strengthen family bonds with siblings and with parents. And chores help to instil a better work ethic which translates pretty well into school and career success.”

Using this hack today, tomorrow and always.

Share Button

Trump Has Already Handed Putin A Win By Hosting Peace Talks In Alaska

Donald Trump has announced that he will be meeting Vladimir Putin in the American state of Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the Ukraine war.

It could be pivotal moment in the conflict, even though no one from Europe – including Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy – is thought to be invited to the talks.

This has sparked major concerns that Trump will prioritise Putin’s demands to end the war over Ukraine’s.

The US president has already said there may be a land swap in exchange for peace, evidently overlooking how Russia started the war and occupies 20% of Ukraine.

While the talks themselves will have given the Kremlin a boost, choosing to hold them in Alaska will have caused further celebration in Russia.

Putin’s aide Yuri Ushakov told Russian state news agency TASS: “Russia and the US are close neighbours, sharing a common border.

“It seems quite logical for our delegation simply to fly across the Bering Strait and for the important and anticipated summit of leaders of these two countries to take place precisely in Alaska.”

They were expected to travel to neutral territory – Putin himself suggested the United Arab Emirates – but Trump has persuaded the Russian leader to come to the States.

That means the US president is allowing Putin to circumvent the arrest warrant the International Criminal Court has out for him, as he does not have to fly over hostile countries who could try and apprehend him, for the talks.

The US does not recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC so he will not risk arrest in the States.

It will be the first time he has visited the US in a decade, having last travelled to the States during Barack Obama’s second term.

It’s a small victory for Trump too, because it seems like he has the upper hand by forcing Putin to come to him on his territory.

But there’s also a historical element to the meeting place, because Alaska used to Russian territory before it was sold to the US in the 19th Century.

A Russian negotiator, Kirill Dmitriev, who attended US envoy Steve Witkoff’s recent meeting with Putin, even called Alaska “a Russian-born American” which reflects the ties between their countries.

Russian nationalists have also repeatedly called for the land to be returned to Russia over the years.

Former Russian president and Putin ally, Dmitry Medvedev – who is now a senior security official – claimed in January 2024 that the US should return Alaska to Russia.

Share Button

Trump Rips ‘Disgusting Degenerate’ Nancy Pelosi In Saturday Night Stock Rant

US President Donald Trump furiously accused former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California) of shady stock market dealings this weekend.

Shooting off an angry Truth Social post on Saturday night, the president wrote, “Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very ‘interesting’ husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average ‘minds’ beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them.”

“It’s all INSIDE iNFORMATION! Is anybody looking into this???” he then asked.

Hiding no hints of bitterness, Trump added, “She is a disgusting degenerate, who Impeached me twice, on NO GROUNDS, and LOST! How are you feeling now, Nancy???”

Her husband Paul Pelosi’s seemingly knack for trading has long been a topic of conversation.

For years, Paul Pelosi’s portfolio has regularly outperformed top hedge funds, raising questions about if his wife’s role in Washington, DC, has helped give him an unfair edge on the market.

Estimates from stock research platform Quiver Quantitative peg the Pelosis’ holdings to be worth around $164 million.

Pelosi has claimed she has no say in her husband’s trading decisions and defended his stock dealings as his right to participate in the free market.

Though she previously balked at the idea of enacting trade restrictions on politicians, Pelosi seems to have shifted her position in recent days.

Last month, she endorsed Senator Josh Hawley’s (Republican, Missouri) bipartisan backed HONEST Act (Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions, which would ban federal legislators, the president and the vice president from trading stocks.

“The American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest, not their personal portfolios,” she told The Associated Press in July.

In 2023 when the legislation was originally introduced, it was dubbed the PELOSI Act, short for Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments.

According to Bloomberg, the president’s net worth has more than doubled since he launched his last campaign for office.

Trump and his family’s cryptocurrency coins have banked them hundreds of millions of dollars.

Tech mogul Jeff Bezo’s Amazon Studios purchased rights for a Melania Trump documentary for $40 million in January, nearly three-times more than the next closest offer, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Share Button

A US Ambassador Ranted About The UK After It Criticised Israel. This Labour MP Had Just 1 Thing To Say.

A Labour MP tore into Donald Trump’s ambassador to Israel this morning after he criticised the UK.

Mike Huckabee slammed Britain and prime minister Keir Starmer on X after the UK condemned Israel’s plan to expand its military operation in Gaza, despite the ongoing humanitarian crisis there.

Starmer joined many European allies in warning Israel that occupying Gaza City, the largest city in the Palestinian territory, would only cause further “bloodshed”, almost two years after Israel first declared war on Hamas.

In a statement on Friday, the prime minister said: “Wwe urge it to reconsider immediately. Every day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens and hostages taken by Hamas are being held in appalling and inhuman conditions. We need a ceasefire now.”

But Huckabee replied by bizarrely talking about World War 2.

He wrote on X: “So Israel is expected to surrender to Hamas & feed them even though Israeli hostages are being starved?

“Did UK surrender to Nazis and drop food to them? Ever heard of Dresden, PM Starmer?

“That wasn’t food you dropped. If you had been PM then UK would be speaking German!”

In a second post, he added: “How much food has Starmer and the UK sent to Gaza? @IsraeliPM has already sent 2 MILLION TONS into Gaza & none of it even getting to hostages. Maybe UK PM ought to sit this one out & follow Arab League who said Hamas should disarm & release ALL hostages immediately.”

Huckabee’s analogy compares the current war in Gaza to the joint British and American decision to bomb the German city of Dresden in February 1945.

It was one of the most controversial moments from World War 2 because many argue the attack, which killed around 25,000 people was unnecessary and cruel – especially as it occurred just months before the conflict ended.

Meanwhile, Israel is coming under intense scrutiny for its war in Gaza where at least 60,000 Gazans have been killed, and Israel’s aid blockade is causing mass starvation.

So Emily Thornberry, the chair of the UK’s Foreign Affairs Committee and a former member of Starmer’s shadow cabinet, offered a no-nonsense response to Huckabee on X.

She wrote: “This Ambassador is clearly an idiot.”

Trump has tried to end the war in Gaza but has refused to commit to recognising a Palestinian state, unlike the UK, France and Canada.

Just days after he acknowledged that people are starving in the territory, the US president said it was Israel’s choice to expand its military offensive.

Trump told reporters: “That’s going to be pretty much up to Israel.”

Share Button

My Lab Conducted A Study On Preschool Girls. What We Discovered Should Disturb You.

Over the past year, a friend’s daughter – let’s call her Lily – has repeatedly called herself ugly.

When Lily is supposed to be brushing her teeth, she looks in the mirror with a frown on her face, eyes scanning her features with disappointment.

Lily has wavy dark-brown hair; she wants straight blonde hair.

One morning Lily put pink marker all over her mouth. The day before, a child at school had called her ugly, and she thought the “lipstick” would make her look prettier.

Lily is 4. And she is beautiful.

How has the world warped this child’s view of herself? Why does Lily even need to care about looking beautiful at 4? Is she worried about getting a date for the class field trip?

More attention is finally being paid toward the harmful effects of social media on teens’ body image and mental health. However, a study my lab conducted suggests that we are missing an important piece of the puzzle. Specifically, we discovered that among girls, a preoccupation with appearance starts as young as age 3.

In our study, we interviewed 170 children ages 3 to 5 to examine when kids start to value being beautiful. Across all of the measures that we assessed, girls on average greatly valued their appearances. Girls said that to be a girl they needed to be pretty, and looking pretty was important.

When asked to select from an array of outfits and occupations, the girls in our study tended to select many fancy outfits and appearance-related occupations, like being a model or makeup artist. They showed good memory for pictures of fashionable clothing when these pictures were later hidden from view.

When explaining why they liked a pop culture character, girls often said things like, “I like all the princesses because they are pretty.” In a previous study, young girls also tended to purchase many toys that focused on appearance (e.g., a vanity set) with play money.

Across both studies, not only did girls tend to care highly about appearances, but they also did so more than boys.

Girls were about five times more likely than boys to say they liked a character due to what I refer to as “appearance reasons”.

Boys more often cited “action reasons,” such as liking Spider-Man “because he jumps high, climbs and shoots webs”.

Our study concluded that gender differences related to how much emphasis we place on beauty likely start in preschool.

While girls around the world have long been taught that beauty is of utmost importance, conversations with other gender development experts point to the early 2000s as a pivotal period when a new “girlie-girl” culture emerged.

One driver of this culture was the launch of the Disney Princess franchise in 2000, which continues to enamour young girls. My two young daughters have probably drawn upwards of a thousand pictures of Moana over the past two years.

Although Disney movies have evolved and now try to include more agentic heroines, the take-home message received by children still centred on beauty.

By adolescence, children are already primed to be preoccupied with how they look – a vulnerability that social media, often a very visual platform, taps into and exploits.

Decades of research have shown that tying self-worth to looks and having a distorted body image are linked to a whole host of negative outcomes, which can include poorer physical health (e.g., eating disorders, substance abuse) and mental health (e.g., depression). An unhealthy focus on appearance can also detract from a focus on school, interfere with academic performance and limit the career aspirations of young women.

If we know that emphasising physical appearance sets girls up for unhappiness – or worse – we must rethink our words and actions that instil this value, and we must begin before adolescence and social media use.

The preschool and kindergarten years are especially critical, as it’s during this time that children typically begin to strongly identify with a gender – whether the one they were assigned at birth or the one they know themselves to be – and they are hungry to learn what that gender means.

Children form gender stereotypes based on the information that is available to them and often doggedly follow these stereotypes. Because children are learning that girls are defined by how they look and boys by what they do, we must change the information they receive.

We can do this in a variety of ways. One is to (re)examine the images and toys our children encounter on a daily basis. Those beloved princesses and mermaid dolls with absurd body proportions can create internal standards that are impossible to attain.

Although adults understand the metaphor in making a superhero larger than life, children, who are extremely visual and swayed by how objects and people look, take these images at face value. We need to buy and create toys that feature diverse body shapes and sizes, varied and accurate facial features, different hair textures and a spectrum of skin colours.

There are some bright spots already out there. Our family loves the three Madrigal sisters from the movie Encanto. Mirabel, the main protagonist, has glasses and curly hair. Her oldest sister Luisa is renowned not for her beauty, but for her physical strength. Isabella, the middle sister, has darker skin and realistic body proportions that my children not only see but also feel when handling their dolls. The village values all three of them for their helpfulness, and their primary goals do not centre around attracting a prince. Barbie is also making more diverse dolls, but those more representative toys are still the minority.

There are also toys and games that encourage girls to solve problems, build structures and robots and use their creativity, but because our culture is still so influenced by gender stereotypes, young girls are often not exposed to them. We need to not only add positive and diverse images and toys, but move away from featuring and selling the harmful ones that currently dominate the market.

Until corporations do better, it’s up to us to do what we can. If you find yourself reaching for an “appearance toy” for a girl in your life, look for toys that encourage a wider variety of activities. Believe me, harmful images and toys will seep into your household, often through gifts from friends and family members, so parents and teachers need to take an active stance. Don’t feel guilty saying no to a toy that promotes an unhealthy approach to appearance.

We can also change how we talk to the children in our lives. Instead of constantly commenting on a child’s appearance – “You look so pretty!” or “That’s a beautiful dress!” – try focusing on other admirable attributes, especially when you’re speaking to girls.

On a broader level, let’s expand the idea of what a girl or a boy can be. By having more examples of the different ways that kids can be their gender (whether by being more or less traditionally feminine, masculine or something in between), everybody wins.

Of course, it’s important to instill a sense of pride in one’s appearance. But this is possible without focusing on traditionally esteemed – and frequently policed – characteristics. It can be even more complicated for children of colour or children from low-income backgrounds, where looking “good” can be unfairly and dangerously tied to respectability.

In these contexts, parents are often actively fighting to keep their kids from internalising insidious white beauty standards, in addition to challenging gender stereotypes.

And although appearance is typically emphasised more among girls, boys also face unrealistic standards regarding muscles and strength. One study found that 49% of boys ages 8-12 were unhappy with their appearance and another found that boys as young as 6 showed preferences for thinner and more muscular bodies.

Many of us relate to feeling dissatisfied with the way we look and have experienced negative outcomes due to our fixation on it. As a 12-year-old, I was obsessed with the weight I gained during puberty. Though doing varsity volleyball and track and field made me fit and strong when I was 15, I was unhappy with my body, and experienced depression and suicidal ideation.

I was not alone. I knew many other girls who were dealing with similar feelings. When I later attended Stanford, I was surrounded by incredible, high-achieving women, some who were world-class athletes, but who also struggled with their body image and disordered eating.

Seeing so many others who also suffered made me realise that these appearance- and health-related matters were bigger than just me.

Ultimately, I was motivated to study gender development as a career, which I’ve been doing for 17 years, in the hopes of addressing this complex and alarming societal issue.

I am anxious about what will happen when my two young daughters become teens, in a society where sexism and patriarchy still run rampant.

My husband and I have even contemplated leaving Los Angeles, arguably one of the most image-obsessed cities in the world.

Whenever we drive down Santa Monica Boulevard, billboards and advertisements expose my daughters to the supposed wonders of plastic surgery, implants and freezing off fat.

When we traipse down Montana Avenue, a swanky shopping area, we pass dozens of eyelash salons, hair salons, nail salons, waxing salons, sugaring salons and skincare shops squeezed in tightly next to each other along the street.

I know that these messages would still reach them no matter where we moved. This is the world we live in. This is the culture we’ve been told to want. These are the messages our children pick up – not just from where they live, but from the shows they watch, the movies they see, the songs they hear, the friends they make and even in their schools. And thanks to social media, AI technology, filters and photoshopping, it’s only getting worse.

So, we need to do whatever we can to combat all of this.

My research shows we have a huge problem on our hands. If a child is already steeped in these gender stereotypes and dysmorphic body ideals by age 5, just imagine what she’ll be thinking by 15.

It’s our responsibility to do whatever we can to foster healthier values and provide more diverse images and ideas of what it means to be a girl, a boy and a human being. I want my daughters – and everyone else’s kids – to always be able to recognise their own unique beauty, and I want them to know their value does not depend on that beauty.

This piece was originally published in May 2024 and is being rerun now as part of HuffPost Personal’s “Best Of” series.

May Ling Halim, Ph.D., is a developmental psychologist and is a mother of two girls. She is a Professor of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach, and the Director of the Culture and Social Identity Development Lab. Her research focuses on gender identity development among diverse young children. Her work has been published in leading academic journals on child development.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Help and support:

Share Button

A Single Moment In High School Tore My Life Apart. 1 Regret Has Followed Me Ever Since.

My truest taste of regret happened when I was just 16. I was a junior in high school and feeling fully overwhelmed by things I had no control over. That feeling came directly from living in a family unraveling at the seams, but I was too young to understand what was happening. My emotions were packaged up tightly, so I grabbed hold of things I did understand, and what I understood more than anything else was swimming.

I had been a competitive swimmer for almost all of my childhood. I had pushed my way near the top of my high school team, yet I was afraid to be there. I will never quite know if I was afraid of failing, afraid of being good or both. It didn’t matter. I wasn’t willing to live up to my full potential, and the worst part was that I knew it.

By the time I reached my third high school swim season, I was tired. I was tired of treading in one place, but mostly, I was tired of the lack of effort I was putting into the thing I loved. I couldn’t trust myself enough to try to be my best self, because there was no comfort in that. I carried a great burden because of my lack of self-worth, but I wouldn’t actually know that until much, much later — when I could no longer do anything about it.

I spent the entirety of my freshman and sophomore years of high school working tirelessly to dis-earn my spot in the lane with the fastest swimmers. I had goggle issues. I had shoulder problems. There were even moments when I quietly prayed I’d break my leg so I didn’t have to go to practice anymore.

But it wasn’t the swimming, the practices or even the racing or the other girls that was the problem. It was me.

However, as most things go, once I finally realised that, it was too late.

In the middle of my junior season, I went to a high school dance with a few other swimmer friends (the ones who actually longed to lead the lane) and my then-boyfriend. I wore a satin periwinkle above-the-knee dress with a velvet bodice and a matching cropped coat. I shoved tissues into the toes of my T.J. Maxx clearance rack patent-leather shoes because I had bought them a size too big. The night was supposed to be perfect.

But in the time that it takes to sneeze, everything changed.

A varsity photo of the author during her junior year of high school in 1997. "This was just a few months before my accident," she writes.

Courtesy of Ryan Rae Harbuck

A varsity photo of the author during her junior year of high school in 1997. “This was just a few months before my accident,” she writes.

The car I was riding in on the way home from the dance jerked and shuddered, and then it flew. It rolled across the grass median of the highway and struck another vehicle head-on. My blood-starved body wept on the asphalt until paramedics arrived. Two people lost their lives, and though I had instantly been paralysed from the chest down, because I survived, I was considered one of the lucky ones.

Months and even years later, I had no recollection of that night. It became a story that I told to people with little emotion or remorse. The pain of what I experienced rarely crept in because my brain never allowed me to see what really happened. What was lost. What was taken away.

Many years later, I’ve learned to live my new life from the seat of a wheelchair. I have done so with great purpose and gusto because, even though I don’t remember that night, I will always feel its rubble. The accident and my wheelchair brought about a new perspective on living, and I vowed to always live each day to its greatest potential — without new regrets.

Still, when my 16-year-old self’s physical wounds had healed, and I was lowered into my high school pool by my coaches and teammates, all that invigoration and determination melted away. My legs could no longer support me in my swim. They had grown skinny and frail. They were scarred and scathed. My lower half was pale and cold, and those legs would never bring me back to the lane with the fastest swimmers whom I loved to loathe.

I lost that moment. All the control. Forever.

My regret of holding myself back because I was afraid to try has followed me since. My swimming career was taken away before I was ready to give up fully. My life as I knew it — as a naïve teenage-sort-of-swimmer — was too.

The author at the hospital doing pool therapy after her car accident in 1997. "They used a lift to get me into the pool," she writes.

Courtesy of Ryan Rae Harbuck

The author at the hospital doing pool therapy after her car accident in 1997. “They used a lift to get me into the pool,” she writes.

I will never know what I could have done with the determination I have now. I will never know what I could have been. I used to dream about a different path, a different life for myself — but I have learned that doesn’t serve me. The energy and force it takes to dream something different for yourself should be used to make those changes in your everyday.

Because of a single moment of regret — that raw sense of pain and oozing remorse — I decided I would never allow myself to live another minute like that ever again. There isn’t enough time in this precious world to navigate the elusive “what ifs.” Take advantage of what you can control to push forward.

Feeling an unresolved sense of competition, I found my way back to the pool years later. Twice. First I began coaching swimming, which ultimately led me to coaching at the high school where I was once too shy to truly try. I kept a keen eye out for the girls who, like me, were afraid to succeed. Coaching became a way for me to teach those lessons I had learned to wide-eyed teens before it was too late for them too.

It led me to create new swimming goals for myself.

For two years straight, I trained to try to make the Paralympic swim team. At the time, I was a high school teacher, so I woke up each day at 3:30 a.m. just to get my practice in. I thrashed through the water each morning, day in and day out, because I had the passion to prove to myself and prove to the world how powerful it is to try.

The author (in the water) at the Parapan American Games in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 2011. "I was one of the only athletes in my classification who had to start in the water," she writes.

Courtesy of Ryan Rae Harbuck

The author (in the water) at the Parapan American Games in Guadalajara, Mexico, in 2011. “I was one of the only athletes in my classification who had to start in the water,” she writes.

I spent countless sums of money traveling to meets to help achieve my goal. And I performed. I broke several American records during this time and even landed a spot on the Parapan American swim team, which gave me the privilege of competing for my country and donning the highly coveted navy-blue American flag swim cap.

All of my effort led me to the Paralympic trials. I raced my heart out. I left it all in the pool. I strolled away feeling like I had done everything in my power to make the team. I had zero regrets.

I did not make the team.

I left the meet with a warm sense of pride. Yes, I was disappointed to not have attained the goal I had zoned in on for two years, but I knew I had done everything I could and left no room for that sneaky antagonist to settle in. I had no regrets about my performance, and I had the regret I felt after my accident to thank for that.

My 16-year-old mind had been in a constant spin of wondering what might have been if I made a different choice. How my life would be better if I would have only tried and trusted myself in the water, before I was broken. Paralysed. Back then, the world pushed me to be better, and I hid from it. However, I didn’t realise at the time that my regret would lead me to live the most championed life I could have ever imagined — and from the seat of a wheelchair.

As an adult, I have chosen paths that won’t leave me wondering. Some of those trails have been winding and treacherous, some have been painful, and some of them have been the result of wrong choices. But even a wrong choice has value if you can push forward from it, and that is always my goal.

Living with a ribbon of regret from decades ago tied around my finger, I have been able to accomplish many more things even bigger than I imagined. I’ve traveled abroad completely alone. I spent a summer in New Delhi. I met a man and fell in love and married him three months later. I gave birth to two healthy children when medical professionals weren’t sure it was possible.

The author and her husband on their wedding day in 2012.

Courtesy of Ryan Rae Harbuck

The author and her husband on their wedding day in 2012.

Now, I wouldn’t change a thing.

The choices we make are often so rooted in active situations — what would happen if we do something? Yet, centering myself around steering clear of new regrets, I am more often asking myself what would happen if I don’t do something. What if I hadn’t trained so hard? Then I would have always wondered what I could have truly accomplished. What if I didn’t trust my gut? Then I wouldn’t have two beautiful sons and a loving family to go home to each night.

And still, I cannot fully escape regret. It’s like a long shadow at the end of a sunlit day. It moves and flows with me, attached directly to the base of my feet. No matter how fast I can go, I will never out-swim it.

But I’m no longer afraid of it. I now see my teenage regret as the very thing that has helped me live the best life I can. It lingers so close simply to remind me to make the best choices, live the best way and be the happiest I know how to be. It’s my guiding antagonist.

The author and her family on vacation at Disneyland in 2024 in California.

Courtesy of Ryan Rae Harbuck

The author and her family on vacation at Disneyland in 2024 in California.

Ryan Rae Harbuck is the author of her memoir, “When I Grow Up I Want to Be a Chair.” She has been a teacher and a swim coach but enjoys being Mom the most. She resides in her hometown of Denver with her husband and two mudslinging boys. To learn more, visit her website at RyanRaeHarbuck.com.

Share Button

As Freakier Friday Hits Cinemas, 11 Sequels That Were Better Than The Original Film

A version of this article was previously published in 2020.

The old saying goes that a sequel is never as good as the original, and over the years, plenty of films have proved this to be the case.

Fortunately for the team behind Freakier Friday, the long-awaited sequel to 2003′s iconic body-swap comedy, critics seem pretty impressed with the follow-up, with many hailing it as a worthy successor to Freaky Friday.

But what about those rare sequels that somehow manage to better the movie that came before it?

Here are 11 of the most celebrated follow-ups in modern movie history…

Addams Family Values

Snap/Shutterstock

We don’t use terms like “perfection” lightly, but if there were ever a perfect family comedy then Addams Family Values might well be it. The fact it’s actually a sequel to a less-revered live-action version of the classic cartoon is even more impressive.

Obviously all of the cast members playing the creepy, kooky, mysterious, spooky and, indeed, altogether ooky family shine as brightly as their dark surroundings will allow (special shout-out to Anjelica Huston serving true macabre glamour as Morticia). But Addams Family Values really belongs to new addition Joan Cusack, who stars as Uncle Fester’s love interest Debbie.

Toy Story 3

Moviestore/Shutterstock

Who’d have guessed that an animated buddy comedy about a toy cowboy and a plastic astronaut would have sparked one of the most lucrative film sagas of recent times?

And while Toy Story 2 – released four years after the original – kicked things up several notches, it was the third instalment in the series that people really went wild for. Toy Story 3 served up adorable new characters, scooped an impressive Best Picture nomination at the Oscars and, crucially, delivered not one but two ugly-cry moments.

Paddington 2

Warner Bros/Moviestore/Shutterstock

Even though the original Paddington film was well-received when it first hit cinemas in 2014 – featuring a CGI version of the classic character interacting with live-action actors – few could predict just how beloved its sequel would go on to become.

Not only was it nominated for Outstanding British Film at the Baftas, it’s also one of the few movies with a perfect score on review site Rotten Tomatoes. With 238 positive reviews, it’s also the highest-rated film on the entire website. Take that, Citizen Kane.

The Dark Knight

Warner Bros/Dc Comics/Kobal/Shutterstock

Like many, we were sold on The Dark Knight from the moment we saw its infamous viral marketing campaign (back in the day when viral marketing campaigns were actually still new and exciting).

We could probably talk all day about how this film is a level up on Batman Begins, from Christopher Nolan’s direction, to the incredible costumes and special effects. But let’s be honest, this film is all about Heath Ledger, who earned a posthumous Academy Award for his unforgettable portrayal of the Joker.

Aliens

20th Century Fox/Kobal/Shutterstock

Although the original Alien divided critics upon its original release in 1979, the film quickly garnered a loyal following, and by the mid-1980s, was revered among fans of sci-fi.

Putting out a sequel was therefore always going to be a bit of a risk, but fortunately 1986′s Aliens more than lived up to its predecessor. It earned Sigourney Weaver a game-changing Oscar nomination as the star of a sci-fi film. It has also been named the Best Sequel Of All Time by Empire magazine.

Mad Max: Fury Road

Moviestore/Shutterstock

Listen, we get it, Fury Road was billed as a “revisiting” of the original Mad Max trilogy, rather than a straight-up sequel or a traditional reboot.

Still, the film was so well-received – check that 97% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes if you don’t believe us, not to mention its six Oscar wins – we felt we couldn’t leave it off this list. Plus, who would pass up the opportunity to see Charlize Theron in all her buzzed glory again?

Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back

Lucasfilm/Fox/Kobal/Shutterstock

Star Wars has so many different instalments, and a fan community that stretches far and wide, that it would be literally impossible to decide which of the numerous sequels is the superior one.

So while we’d struggle to pinpoint which of film is the best, we’ve gone with The Empire Strikes Back for the simple reason it contains arguably the most iconic moment in Star Wars history, when Darth Vader’s true identity is revealed.

Terminator 2: Judgement Day

Moviestore/Shutterstock

He said “I’ll be back”, and apparently he meant it, although it did take seven years.

Terminator 2: Judgement Day was hailed as even better than the original film by many critics, who were wowed by the advanced special effects (which went on to win one of the film’s four Academy Awards).

The success of Terminator 2 led to a number of additional spin-offs and sequels, although none of these have quite been able to match the original two films.

Avengers: Endgame

Avengers: Endgame
Avengers: Endgame

Marvel/Disney/Kobal/Shutterstock

Essentially the sequel to around 100 other films from the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Avengers: Endgame was much-awaited when it hit cinemas in 2019, wrapping up stories that began in the Iron Man, Thor and Captain America film series.

Fortunately, the majority of cinema-goers felt the ambitious project was worth the wait, with Avengers: Endgame landing rave reviews and becoming the highest-grossing film of all time (that’s second-highest, when adjusted for inflation).

The Godfather Part II

Moviestore/Shutterstock

The first sequel to ever win Best Picture at the Academy Awards (the only other being Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King), Godfather II is so revered it was added to the U.S. National Film Registry of the Library of Congress due to its cultural significance, alongside the original Godfather film.

The same can not be said for the follow-up, Godfather III.

Skyfall

Danjaq/Eon Productions/Kobal/Shutterstock

Although Casino Royale and Quantum Of Solace proved popular, many 007 fans still breathed a sigh of relief when Skyfall was released, as they felt it was more in keeping with the James Bond franchise than Daniel Craig’s first two outings.

Skyfall won largely positive reviews from critics, many of whom praised the decision to give more material for Dame Judi Dench to work with, and became the highest-grossing film in the UK ever at that time. Follow-up Spectre was similarly well-received, with the Daniel’s fifth and final Bond film, No Time To Die, set to hit cinemas… soon. Let’s just say soon.

Share Button