Scientists trap light in a layer 1,000x thinner than hair

Researchers from the Faculty of Physics at the University of Warsaw, working with teams from the Łódź University of Technology, the Warsaw University of Technology, and the Polish Academy of Sciences, have created a structure capable of trapping infrared light in a layer just 40 nanometers thick. Their approach relies on a design known as a subwavelength grating made from a specialized material called molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2). The findings were reported in the journal ACS Nano.

Manipulating light at extremely small scales is key to advancing modern technology. As traditional electronics begin to reach their limits, photonics offers an alternative by using light instead of electrons to carry information. Because photons move faster and do not have mass like electrons, devices based on light could become both quicker and smaller, opening the door to more powerful and compact technologies.

The Challenge of Light’s Wavelength

Light behaves both as a particle and as a wave, and this wave nature introduces a limitation. Each type of light has a wavelength, which determines how small a structure can be while still controlling it effectively. Visible light has wavelengths of several hundred nanometers, while infrared light extends to a micrometer or more. This raises an important question: can light be confined in structures smaller than its own wavelength?

The research team demonstrated that this is indeed possible. By engineering a subwavelength grating, they were able to trap infrared light within a layer only 40 nanometers thick. This structure consists of closely spaced parallel strips that interact with light similarly to a prism. When these strips are positioned closer together than the wavelength of light, the grating can act like a near-perfect mirror while also holding the light inside a very small volume.

Why Molybdenum Diselenide Works So Well

Earlier versions of such gratings, made from materials like silicon or gallium compounds, required thicknesses of several hundred nanometers to function effectively. Reducing their size caused them to lose their ability to confine light. The key difference in this new approach is the use of molybdenum diselenide, which has a much higher refractive index. In simple terms, light slows down more inside this material than in others. While light slows by about 1.5 times in glass and roughly 3.5 times in silicon or gallium arsenide, it slows by about 4.5 times in MoSe2. This strong slowing effect allows the structure to shrink dramatically while still trapping light efficiently, resulting in a layer more than a thousand times thinner than a human hair.

Turning Infrared Light Into Blue Light

MoSe2 also brings additional advantages. Like graphene, it forms layered structures, but unlike graphene, it is a semiconductor. It also exhibits nonlinear optical behavior, including a process known as third harmonic generation. In this process, three infrared photons combine into one photon with a higher frequency, effectively converting infrared light into visible blue light. Because the grating strongly concentrates infrared light, this conversion becomes much more efficient. The researchers found that the effect is more than 1,500 times stronger compared to a flat layer of the same material.

Another major advance lies in how the material was produced. Previously, thin layers of MoSe2 were created using exfoliation — a method similar to peeling layers off a crystal with adhesive tape. While simple, this technique is inconsistent and limited to very small areas, typically around ten square micrometers, which is not suitable for real-world devices.

To overcome this, the team used molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), a well-established method for growing semiconductor layers. This approach allowed them to produce large, uniform MoSe2 films spanning several square inches. Despite this large size, the layer maintained a thickness of just 40 nanometers, giving it an extreme aspect ratio. For comparison, the thickness-to-size ratio of this layer is about one to a million, while a typical A4 sheet of paper has a ratio closer to 1:2000.

Toward Practical Photonic Applications

These results suggest that molybdenum diselenide produced in this way could significantly change how light is controlled in future technologies. Structures no longer need to be thick to manipulate light effectively. Instead, extremely thin layers can perform the same function, and in some cases even better. Because the production method is scalable, the path toward real-world applications, such as photonic integrated circuits, is becoming increasingly realistic.

Funding and Support

The research was funded by the National Science Centre under projects OPUS 2020/39/B/ST7/03502 and 2021/41/B/ST3/04183, with European Union funds under ERC-ADVANCED grant No. 101053716, the Foundation for Polish Science under project ENG.02.01-IP.05-T004/23, and by the University of Warsaw under the Excellence Initiative – Research University (IDUB) New Ideas in Priority Research Areas II No. 501-D111-20-2004310 titled “Ultrathin subwavelength gratings based on dichalcogenides.”

Share Button

A massive arctic thaw is unleashing carbon frozen for thousands of years

A new study offers one of the clearest pictures yet of what happens as Arctic permafrost thaws. Led by geoscientist Michael Rawlins at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the research provides detailed insight into how warming temperatures are reshaping water systems and releasing long-frozen carbon.

The team examined a region of Alaska’s North Slope roughly the size of Wisconsin, where hundreds of rivers and streams drain into the Beaufort Sea. Using 44 years of model data at a resolution of one kilometer, they found that runoff is rising sharply, rivers are carrying increasing amounts of carbon, and the thaw season is extending later into the year, now reaching late summer and fall. The findings were published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

Arctic Rivers Play an Outsized Role in the Global System

Rivers in the Arctic have a surprisingly large influence on the planet. They deliver about 11% of the world’s river water into an ocean that holds just 1% of global ocean volume. This makes the Arctic Ocean especially sensitive to changes occurring in rivers and streams across the region.

Although melting snow supplies much of this water, thawing permafrost is becoming increasingly important. The ground contains a layer known as the “active layer,” which freezes and thaws each year. As the climate warms, this layer is getting deeper, allowing more groundwater to flow into Arctic rivers.

Thawing Soil Is Releasing Ancient Carbon

The active layer holds large quantities of organic material that have been frozen for thousands of years. As it deepens, more of this material is released into rivers as dissolved organic carbon (DOC), eventually reaching the ocean.

The Arctic Ocean already receives a disproportionate share of this carbon compared to other parts of the world. Each year, more than 275 million tons of it are converted into carbon dioxide, adding to global warming and creating a feedback loop that can intensify climate change.

Limited Observations Make Modeling Essential

Understanding how individual rivers respond to warming is challenging because direct measurements in northern Alaska are limited.

“What makes this question so hard to answer is that direct observations are very sparse in northern Alaska,” says Rawlins, extension associate professor of Earth, Geographic, and Climate Sciences at UMass Amherst. “There are nowhere near enough river sample measurements to quantify inputs to estuaries along the entire Alaskan North Slope.”

To address this gap, Rawlins developed the Permafrost Water Balance Model over the past 25 years. This model estimates key processes such as snow accumulation, melt, and changes in the active layer to better represent real conditions. In 2021, it was expanded to simulate dissolved organic carbon, and in 2024 it was applied across 22.45 million square kilometers of Arctic land.

The model suggests that over the next 80 years, the Arctic could experience up to 25% more runoff, 30% more subsurface flow, and increasing dryness in southern areas.

High-Resolution Modeling Reveals New Patterns

Previous versions of the model used grid cells that were 25 kilometers wide. This study improves on that by capturing changes at a much finer scale.

“We’ve typically run the model on 25-kilometer grid cells,” says Rawlins. “This new study is the first time anyone has captured such a wide area of the Arctic — about the size of Wisconsin — down to the kilometer scale, and over such a long period of time: our model simulates daily river flows and coastal exports over 44 years from 1980 to 2023.”

Running the model required substantial computing power. Each simulation took 10 continuous days on a supercomputer at the Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center.

“Our freshwater and DOC inputs to coastal estuaries will be useful to a broad range of stakeholders interested in these unique ecosystems in coastal northern Alaska,” says Rawlins, “including the Beaufort Lagoon Ecosystems project, which is helping to quantify exactly what’s coming through these coastal estuaries.”

Northwest Alaska Shows the Biggest Carbon Increases

The researchers found that while runoff and thawing are increasing across the region, the largest rise in carbon export is occurring in northwest Alaska.

“It’s flatter over there,” says Rawlins, “which means there’s much more carbon from decaying matter in the permafrost that has been accumulating for tens of thousands of years. This is ancient carbon. The further east you go, the more mountainous it becomes. The soil is rockier and sandier, and so far less DOC is mobilized as the permafrost thaws.”

A Longer Thaw Season Is Driving Change

One of the most notable findings is how much of the change is tied directly to permafrost thaw. The thaw season now lasts longer than in the past, extending into September and even October.

These changes are likely affecting salinity, nutrient cycles, and food webs in the Beaufort Sea. Researchers are now studying how ice wedge polygons, a common Arctic landscape feature, influence how water and carbon move toward coastal areas.

A Critical Gap in Understanding the Carbon Cycle

“How much DOC finds its way to the ocean via rivers and streams is a part of the carbon cycle we don’t know much about,” says Rawlins. “We desperately need more of these land-to-ocean connection studies if we’re to fully grapple with the problem of global warming and the effects it will have on coastal ecosystems.”

The research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation and NASA.

Share Button

How To Tell If Your Standards Are, In Fact, Too High

Having standards when dating is important. But sometimes we get so caught up in the pursuit of the perfect partner that we let those standards get in the way of meeting quality people.

When you’re swiping through a dating app and find yourself rejecting person after person, it’s worth asking: Are your standards too high?

“With dating apps, it is easy to dismiss someone in seconds with a swipe,” Bonnie Winston, celebrity matchmaker and relationship expert, told HuffPost. “You are looking at a human being, but we get used to not realising it is an actual soul, a living and breathing person.”

It happens to the best of us; no one wants to risk another failed relationship. And with the right mindset, standards can actually help you weed out the wrong potential partners.

But what kind of high standards are actually self-sabotaging, and which ones are worth keeping? Here’s what dating experts want you to know.

The Most Common High Standards Dating Experts See

From physical traits to lifestyle preferences, dating experts have heard just about every standard one could set.

Winston has had clients arrive at her sessions with exhaustive checklists resembling a child’s Christmas list. Once, she had a male client who refused to go on a second date with a beautiful, highly educated woman who shared his values and hobbies. His reason? She was 5-foot-1, and he wanted his future children to have a shot at playing basketball.

Some standards, like patience and emotional intelligence are worth holding out for. Others, like a very specific height window? Not so much.

MelkiNimages via Getty Images

Some standards, like patience and emotional intelligence are worth holding out for. Others, like a very specific height window? Not so much.

For Emma Hathorn, dating expert at Seeking.com, the standards themselves aren’t the problem. It’s when people associate their specific standards with perfection and refuse to engage with people who are otherwise really compatible that it becomes an issue.

“I actually push back on the idea of having standards that are ‘too high’ entirely,” she told HuffPost. “Most of the standards people criticise, such as wanting emotional maturity, ambition, or financial stability, are not unrealistic. They are signals of compatibility and shared values.”

When High Standards Can Actually Work For You

“Standards are healthiest when they reflect self-respect,” Hathorn said. For example, ask yourself whether a person shares your values or wants similar things in life. Those core values are key to a long-lasting relationship.

Lifestyle standards, such as being “outdoorsy,” an adventurous eater or preferring city life over the suburbs, can also be healthy because they often reflect how someone wants to live day to day, Hathorn adds. Relationships are built around everyday habits, and these factors usually point to compatibility in routines.

Then there’s emotional effort, which includes communication, maturity, and how one can invest in the relationship.

A lot of people focus on surface traits like looks, but one of the most important predictors of a healthy relationship is how much effort someone puts into showing up consistently,” said Hathorn. “Those qualities determine whether a connection actually grows over time.”

When These Standards Work Against You

Aside from shrinking the dating pool, some high standards can become a form of avoidance, Hathorn said: “A standard should help you identify alignment, not disqualify someone who might otherwise be a great partner.”

“The difference between someone with high standards and someone who is emotionally unavailable is willingness,” Hathorn continued. “High-standard daters are ready to build something meaningful with the right person. An emotionally unavailable person might actively avoid the right person.”

Sometimes high standards have nothing to do with finding the right person. “People set rigid criteria because they’re trying to avoid vulnerability,” Hathorn said. “In those cases, the standard isn’t about finding the right person; it’s about protecting themselves from risk.”

Rigid criteria can also be a means of avoidance. It's easier to avoid being challenged emotionally if you've already decided no one can meet your standards.

xavierarnau via Getty Images

Rigid criteria can also be a means of avoidance. It’s easier to avoid being challenged emotionally if you’ve already decided no one can meet your standards.

How To Tell Whether Your Standards Are Sabotaging You

So how do you know if your standards are working for you or against you? Hathorn suggests asking yourself this question: Do your standards represent a value or an image? “Wanting a partner who is emotionally mature, financially responsible, or ambitious reflects values,” she explained. “Wanting someone who fits a very specific aesthetic or status symbol is usually about image, and not always something someone can change.”

Also, remind yourself to think realistically about what you want out of a match. “Some people come to me wanting a 10 in looks, a 10 in intelligence, a 10 in professional success, and a 10 in personality,” Winston said. “That is just not possible, and no one can embody that.”

When meeting someone new, ask yourself if your hesitations are based on values or fear.

“When it’s genuinely not a match, the disconnect usually shows up in core areas like goals, lifestyle, communication style, or emotional availability,” Hathorn explained. “When it’s self-sabotage, people often walk away because things feel unfamiliar, vulnerable, or ‘too good to be true.’”

And when in doubt, remember that standards should serve as guidelines, not gospel. Take another one of Winston’s clients, who she said narrowed her original list of standards to three important ones, only to end up marrying her first match. The kicker? “He didn’t have anything on the list!”

Share Button

Protein Overload Might Be Sabotaging Your Hair Goals. Here’s What To Look Out For

If protein is a building block of hair, it can only be a good thing to load up on lots of products that contain protein, right?

Popular hair repair options these days include keratin, collagen, peptides and bond-building complexes that claim to improve the health of your hair. But don’t load up on them too fast…

While protein helps maintain strong, healthy hair, strands can actually become stiff and brittle when topically applied protein builds up faster than hair can handle it, leading to breakage, frizz and tangling.

Here, experts explain what protein overload is, how to spot it in your hair and how to rebalance your routine.

Why too much protein can backfire

Protein is made primarily of keratin, which gives each strand of hair strength and structure. Bonds, also known as crosslinks, between keratin chains within the hair allow it to stretch.

“Healthy hair is the state where this protein matrix and its crosslinks are intact enough that fibres resist traction, yet still show good elastic return and cosmetic shine,” explained Caroline Ruggiero, a certified trichologist and CEO at Truly You Hair & Scalp Clinic in Mississauga, Ontario.

But when protein-based shampoos, conditioners, masks and styling products – which are often marketed as strengthening or repairing – are layered too frequently, the result can be protein overload.

“Like anything, more isn’t always better,” said Emmanuel Mroczka, a trichologist and co-owner at The Hair & Scalp Specialists in Fairview Park, Ohio. “Hair impacted by protein overload typically feels stiff or straw-like, rough even after conditioning, prone to tangling and static and brittle – snapping easily instead of stretching.”

When protein-based shampoos, conditioners, masks and styling products are layered too frequently, the result can be protein overload.

Boy_Anupong via Getty Images

When protein-based shampoos, conditioners, masks and styling products are layered too frequently, the result can be protein overload.

He adds that breakage also often appears in areas that typically remain intact, such as closer to the scalp or around the crown, because the hair has lost elasticity from root to tip.

Protein overload can closely resemble simple dryness, but the key difference is elasticity. “Dry hair often softens with moisture and still has some stretch. Hair affected by excess protein tends to feel rigid and snaps easily, even after conditioning,” Mroczka said, noting that an easy at-home test is to gently stretch a damp strand.

Healthy hair should have a little give and bounce back, and knowing the difference can help you choose the right treatment and avoid overcorrecting.

Why hair absorbs too much protein

Chemical treatments, like bleach, relaxers, perms and repeated colouring, along with heat styling and UV or pollution exposure, can damage the hair cuticle, which is the protective outer layer, and increase shaft porosity.

“When the cuticle is disrupted, hair loses internal proteins and lipids, the cortex becomes more exposed, which causes more hair porosity,” explained board-certified dermatologist and hair transplant surgeon Dr. Divya Shokeen, noting that this is why hair absorbs products more aggressively, making protein buildup more likely.

When hair feels damaged, reaching for protein-repair products is a common instinct. While the ingredients in protein-forward products, such as hydrolysed keratin, collagen, amino acids, keratin peptides and bond-building complexes, aren’t inherently harmful, Shokeen notes that the real risk lies in overcorrecting.

“Damaged hair needs a balance of protein, moisture and lipids, not just high-protein products alone,” Shokeen said. Repeated use of protein-heavy treatments, especially layered in the same routine and paired with infrequent washing, can leave already fragile strands feeling even more brittle.

“Clinical rule of thumb: the more styling layers used, the more important periodic clarifying washes become,” Shokeen said.

How protein overload affects your hair

Protein overload doesn’t typically stop hair growth at the follicle, but it can affect how long and full your hair looks by increasing brittleness and breakage. “If protein-based products are applied directly to the scalp, which, like conditioner, generally isn’t recommended, they can contribute to buildup and irritation around the follicle,” Mroczka said. “Over time, chronic scalp irritation or inflammation can interfere with a healthy growth environment.”

It can also blur the line between shedding and breakage. “Many people think they’re shedding excessively, when in reality they’re experiencing mid-shaft breakage that appears as shorter hairs,” Mroczka said, noting that the typical daily hair shedding is around 80 to 100 strands as part of the natural growth cycle.

“When protein overload is present, breakage often layers on top of this normal shedding, making hair loss feel more dramatic than it actually is.” The good news is that this is often fixable once the routine is rebalanced.

Hair types that are most vulnerable

Fine, chemically treated and low-density hair are especially prone to protein overload. Shokeen said fine strands have less inherent strength and a smaller shaft diameter, which limits flexibility, so protein-heavy products can quickly cause stiffness and breakage.

Porosity also matters. High-porosity hair absorbs protein quickly, due to gaps or damage in the cuticle, making overload likely. This hair type benefits from occasional protein paired with consistent moisture and lipid support. Low-porosity hair, with a tightly closed cuticle, resists absorption. Protein often sits on the surface, causing coating, stiffness and dryness. “Low-porosity hair usually does better with lighter hydrolysed proteins or minimal protein use,” Shokeen said.

Because the ideal frequency of protein treatments depends on both your hair type and the specific formula, experts recommend following label directions closely for best results. “In general, I recommend intervals. For instance, one month on and three months off,” Ruggiero said. “More is not more.”

How to reset your routine

“First, pause all protein-based products, including conditioners, masks, leave-ins and styling treatments labelled ‘repair,’ ‘strengthening’ or ‘bond-building,’” Mroczka said, noting that in some cases, this may also include protein-heavy shampoos.

Next, switch to a hydrating shampoo. Gently cleanse the scalp, letting the lather rinse through the lengths without aggressive scrubbing, and follow with a moisturising conditioner to improve slip and flexibility. “A lightweight hydrating or conditioning spray throughout the day can help support moisture, especially on dry ends,” he added.

If buildup is present, a clarifying shampoo can help, but no more than once every other week. “These formulas use stronger cleansers, and overuse can strip natural oils and worsen dryness or irritation,” Mroczka noted. During this reset, limit heat styling and chemical treatments for a few weeks to allow elasticity to recover.

“Once hair begins to feel softer and more flexible again, protein can be slowly reintroduced,” Mroczka advised. “Balance is the goal, not eliminating protein entirely.”

Share Button

Binge drinking just once a month may triple your risk of liver scarring

LOS ANGELES — People may assume that if they drink lightly during the week or month, heavy drinking on the occasional Friday or Saturday may not cause their liver harm. 

New research suggests otherwise, according to a Keck Medicine of USC study published today in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Researchers discovered that people with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the most common liver condition in the country affecting one-in-three adults, face significantly higher risk of liver fibrosis, or harmful scarring of the liver, if they engage in episodic heavy drinking. Episodic heavy drinking is four or more drinks in one day for women and five or more drinks in one day for men, at least once a month. 

Those who consume large amounts of alcohol in a single day at least once per month are three times more likely to develop advanced liver fibrosis than individuals who spread out the same total alcohol intake over time, according to the findings. 

Younger adults and men were more likely to report episodic heavy drinking, and the more drinks consumed at one time, the more liver fibrosis people tended to have. 

“This study is a huge wake-up call because traditionally, physicians have tended to look at the total amount of alcohol consumed, not how it is consumed, when determining the risk to the liver,” said Brian P. Lee, MD, MAS, a hepatologist and liver transplant specialist with Keck Medicine and principal investigator of the study. “Our research suggests that the public needs to be much more aware of the danger of occasional heavy drinking and should avoid it even if they drink moderately the rest of the time.”  

How the study was conducted 

Lee and his colleagues used data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a long-running health survey of the United States population. They included data from more than 8,000 adults, collected between 2017 and 2023. In particular, they looked at the link between episodic heavy drinking and advanced liver fibrosis to understand how drinking patterns — not just total drinks — may cause harm even to moderate drinkers, which is considered seven drinks a week for women and 14 or less for men.  

The research team focused on MASLD because of its prevalence among Americans. MASLD affects people with excess weight, obesity or other metabolic conditions, such as Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure or high cholesterol, and is on the rise. Additionally, while MASLD is not defined as alcohol-related, Lee and his colleagues wanted to explore if alcohol did in fact play some role in the condition. 

More than one-half of the adults included in the study reported episodic heavy drinking and almost 16% of patients with MASLD were episodic heavy drinkers. 

The researchers compared people with MASLD with the same age, sex and average weekly alcohol consumption, segmenting some as episodic heavy drinkers and others as non-episodic heavy drinkers, to reach their conclusion that episodic heavy drinkers with MASLD had nearly three times higher odds of experiencing advanced liver fibrosis.  

Lee speculates that episodic heavy drinking can harm the liver both directly and indirectly. Drinking large amounts of alcohol at once can overwhelm the liver and increase inflammation, which leads to scarring and damage. People with MASLD may be particularly at risk, as Lee’s previous research has shown that obesity, high blood pressure and other conditions associated with MASLD can more than double liver disease risk. 

Alcohol-related liver disease has more than doubled in the last two decades, according to Lee. He believes this trend is driven by pandemic-era surges in drinking and an increase in people with risk factors for MASLD, like obesity and diabetes.  

“Although this study focused on patients with MASLD, these findings may also be pertinent to a broader patient population,” said Lee. “With more than half of adults reporting some episodic heavy drinking, this issue deserves further attention from both physicians and researchers to help better understand, prevent and treat liver disease.” 

### 

For more information about Keck Medicine of USC, please visit news.KeckMedicine.org

The study was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, grant number K23AA029752. 

Share Button

Irritable Male Syndrome (IMS) Is An Actual Condition — And It Could Explain A Lot

We seem to have reached peak “get off my lawn” culture, with men having temper tantrums all over the damn place. Whether they’re typing shrill all-caps messages, foaming at the mouth with road rage or aggressively punching holes in your drywall, men seem to be angrier than ever. And with a “boys will be boys” cultural mindset that provides a free pass on bad behavior to men well into their final decades, it’s hard to know when, or if, these antics will ever end.

Would it make you feel any better to know that there’s not only a possible medical reason, but even an accepted syndrome designation, for this way many men have of interacting with the world?

Maybe not, but the term “irritable male syndrome” does exist, and in the two decades since it was coined, it’s become accepted in medical and psychological circles. While not a clinical diagnosis, experts say it’s an accurate description of a cluster of symptoms that often appears in aging men.

“Along with the term ‘andropause,’ which refers to male menopause, it’s a useful shorthand for describing what happens to men through gradual testosterone decline and hormonal changes,” said Dr Justin Houman, assistant professor of urology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Gradual testosterone decline can contribute to a number of symptoms, including mood changes, low energy and fatigue.

Andreas Kindler via Getty Images

Gradual testosterone decline can contribute to a number of symptoms, including mood changes, low energy and fatigue.

According to Houman, the most common symptoms are:

  • Mood changes, including irritability, lower motivation and feelings of depression
  • Cognitive changes, like difficulty concentrating or memory lapses
  • Low energy and fatigue that isn’t explained by poor sleep alone
  • Reduced libido and fewer spontaneous erections
  • Loss of muscle mass and strength despite regular exercise
  • Increased body fat, particularly around the midsection
  • Sleep disturbances, including insomnia or poor-quality rest

These symptoms don’t happen overnight, he said. “Male hormonal decline is gradual, with testosterone levels peaking in the late teens to early 20s, remaining relatively stable through the 30s, and starting to decline by about 1% per year after age 40. Most men start noticing symptoms like those listed above between 40 and 60, though lifestyle, chronic illness and genetics can accelerate or delay onset.”

How we got here

The term “irritable male syndrome” (IMS) was coined in 2001 by Dr. Gerald Lincoln, a Scottish scientist known for his work in endocrinology and reproductive biology. He was researching testosterone levels in sheep when he observed a correlation between declining testosterone levels and increased irritability and aggression in rams after the mating season. He observed similar behaviors in other males when their testosterone levels dropped, eventually identifying the syndrome in red deer, reindeer and even Indian elephants.

It’s a state of hypersensitivity, anxiety, frustration and anger that occurs in males that’s associated with biochemical changes, hormonal fluctuations, stress and loss of male identity.

– Dr. Jed Diamond

As years passed, the term was picked up by psychologists and men’s health experts to describe similar emotional and behavioral patterns they were observing in human men, particularly in relation to age-related testosterone decline or stress-induced hormonal shifts.

Psychotherapist and author Dr. Jed Diamond has written the books “Irritable Male Syndrome” and “Mister Mean: Saving Your Relationship From The Irritable Male Syndrome.” He described IMS this way: “It’s a state of hypersensitivity, anxiety, frustration and anger that occurs in males that’s associated with biochemical changes, hormonal fluctuations, stress and loss of male identity. While it does usually occur in men later in life, I’ve seen men in their 20s or 30s, who have poor diets, high stress and other factors, can also experience IMS.”

We react differently to this syndrome because it’s more likely to “sneak up” on those who have it and those who love them, said coaching psychologist James Davis. “The hormonal changes of women’s menopause happen in a relatively narrow window of time, but with age-related testosterone decline, it can be more of a ‘slow drip’ rather than a sudden moment. This means symptoms can often be passed off as being caused by aging, stress or a combination of both.”

While hormonal changes might jump-start IMS, other factors can play a role, Davis said. “Those hormonal changes make men more anxious, which in turn can lead to irritability. There can be a crisis of self-identity that comes from declining physical performance, loss of muscle and lowered libido. When you overlay the stresses of managing a career, finances and relationships, plus the state of the world in general, you can see that many factors could make a man more irritable. Then add in broken sleep, a lack of experience or framework for expressing vulnerability or issues and increasing social isolation, and you can see how multiple factors can pile up to impact an individual.”

One man’s experience

Israel Cassol is a podcaster who began trying to raise awareness of “male menopause” after he was diagnosed with the condition shortly after turning 40. He told the New York Post, “I was hesitant to share such intimate details of my life, but I needed to know if this was an issue others were facing. I couldn’t believe the response I received from men describing similar symptoms I had suffered from.”

These days, he still promotes issues of men’s health, offering this advice to HuffPost: “Men shouldn’t see this as a weakness or something shameful. It’s a natural part of life for many, and talking about it helps break the stigma around men’s emotional health. The sooner we recognize what’s going on, the sooner we can take steps to improve things, and that makes a huge difference not just for men, but for their families and relationships, too.”

Suspect you may have IMS? Here’s what to do

Diamond said that the first step should be a doctor’s appointment: “I’d say that any man over 45 who is experiencing these symptoms consistently should see their doctor for a blood test to check testosterone levels.”

What happens if those levels are low?

“There are effective lifestyle adjustments men can make to boost levels naturally, and there is also the option of testosterone replacement therapy, which is something that requires careful consideration,” Davis said.

What to do if a loved one seems like a likely candidate for IMS? Besides that medical evaluation, Diamond mentioned, Houman suggested encouraging healthy lifestyle changes like more balanced nutrition, regular exercise, good sleep hygiene and reduced stress. “Keep communication open and non-judgmental, and seek counseling if a relationship strain develops,” he said.

What happens next

It’s important to demonstrate compassion for this issue, Davis explained. “You need to realize that this isn’t a personality change per se, but is likely a result of hormonal changes that affect behavior, emotion, cognition and even how that person shows up in the world,” he added.

He also said that this is an issue that needs more attention. “We need to bring andropause out into the open so that both men and women can appreciate what’s going on with male hormones and psychology at this time of life. Midlife men are the highest suicide cohort, with a rate almost five times that of women of all ages, so the issue is significant and we shouldn’t marginalize it by questioning its existence or attempting to downplay it,” Davis added.

Finally, Cassoll offered this encouragement: “Patience and understanding are very important, because men going through this phase don’t always realize what’s happening to them. It helps if loved ones encourage healthier habits and also create space for honest conversations without judgment. Suggesting a medical check-up can be really helpful, because it reassures the man that he’s not ‘going crazy,’ and that there are ways to feel better.”

The original version of this story was published on HuffPost at an earlier date.

Share Button

The Other Bennet Sister: Why Austen Readers Should Watch The BBC Hit

Additional comment from Dr Shelley Galpin, a lecturer in Media, Culture, and Creative Industries at King’s College London.

Adapting a book for a TV show or movie means some readers are sure to be disappointed (take, for instance, Emerald Fennell’s controversial Wuthering Heights).

The BBC’s The Other Bennet Sister is no exception. Focused on Mary, the largely forgotten sibling in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, the series takes significant enough liberties with the author’s original work for some readers to dub it “fanfic”.

Personally, I’ve never seen that as much of an insult (what are Clueless or Bridget Jones if not very well-done Austen fan fictions?).

If anything, though it has its flaws, I think The Other Bennet Sister is a fun, highly watchable series that fits as neatly into the book’s premise as a mid-2020s TV show can.

It’s not the best screenwriting, I grant you. But the 1940 Pride and Prejudice film adaptation, which included the lines “At this moment, it’s difficult to believe that you’re so proud.” “At this moment, it’s difficult to believe that you are so prejudiced”, made a (clunky) point.

The book is all about how we see and unfairly judge one another, including as a reader. And speaking to HuffPost UK, media, culture, and creative industries lecturer Dr Shelley Galpin said, “The [BBC] series works well as a development of those ideas”.

Of course, Lizzie misunderstands Mr Darcy and Wickham in turns, and Mr Darcy is unkindly snobbish about the Bennets.

But we know that because Austen explicitly paints the picture for us. Her real art is in making us question the characters the book itself portrays negatively: if Mrs Bennet is so irrational and silly, how come the far better-off Mr Bennet married her – and why do some of her schemes, like sending a rain-sodden Jane off to sneeze over the nearest herd of poshies, kind of work out?

Why didn’t Lizzie, or most readers, trust Charlotte Lucas when she (rightly) said Mr Collins was perfect for many of her needs?

Not to pummel the remains of a long-dead horse further into the ground here, but the book makes us ask: were we proud, or prejudiced, when we read it?

The Other Bennet Sister
The Other Bennet Sister

I was pleased to see that the Richared E. Grant Mr Bennet’s head-in-the-sand approach to raising children is a lot more explicit than in, say, the 2005 film (even if Mrs Bennet, played by Ruth Jones, is more flatly harsh – both Dr Galpin and I felt the speech she gives at the end of the show was not quite enough to redeem her being “such a nightmare” the rest of the time).

Other characters were reframed, too.

“I definitely felt that some of the more irritating or comic character elements were softened a little [in The Other Bennet Sister] – Mary and Mr Collins were both a little less ‘preachy’ and lacking in social awareness than in their original iterations, so I felt that some artistic license was taken with the characterisation, but this is perhaps consistent with the show centring on Mary’s view of the world more,” said Dr Galpin.

“I… liked the slight rehabilitation of Mr Collins, who is, at the end of the day, trying to do the right thing, even if he is far from the ideal romantic hero.”

Mary, whom I always saw as quite similar to the shy, bookish, devout Fanny Price protagonist in Mansfield Park, was well overdue for a similar reinterpetation, though Dr Galpin pointed out that her TV self might be closer to the original novel than I realised.

“It struck me as I watched it that Mary is essentially playing the ‘Lizzie’ role from P&P. In Austen’s novel, Lizzie is supposed to be a little awkward and lacking in social niceties (in comparison to perfect Jane!) and less attractive than her sister.

“She also continually irritates her mother by making supposedly imprudent marriage choices. Mary essentially steps into this persona in the series. The rivalry with Caroline Bingley also echoes Lizzie’s role in the original novel,” she said.

So, when the BBC show depicts Mary as strong-willed, ambitious, self-aware, and bloomingly confident once she reaches London, it’s not a correction of Jane Austen’s book but a natural extension of it.

It makes as much sense as a spin-off TV series as Mr Collins’ (relatively) successful marriage, or Caroline Bingley’s genuinely well-meaning Wickham warning, do in the novel; not what we were led to expect initially, but hey, what sucker doesn’t question their first impression?

That’s Austen, baby – and in my opinion, the witty, touching, and fun BBC adaptation has bottled it perfectly.

Share Button

AR tech prepares patients for endometriosis surgery

The images are used in consultations to show what happens to the womb, ovaries and fallopian tubes.

Share Button

Scientists reveal new blood pressure treatment that works when others fail

A new medication has been found to significantly reduce blood pressure in people whose levels remain dangerously high even after taking multiple existing drugs. The findings come from a Phase III clinical trial led by a professor at UCL.

High blood pressure (hypertension) affects about 1.3 billion people worldwide. In nearly half of these cases, the condition is either uncontrolled or does not respond well to treatment. This greatly increases the risk of heart attack, stroke, kidney disease, and early death. In the UK alone, around 14 million people are living with hypertension.

Large International Trial of Baxdrostat

The international BaxHTN trial, led by Professor Bryan Williams (UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science) and funded by AstraZeneca, tested a new drug called baxdrostat, which is taken as a tablet. The study included nearly 800 patients across 214 clinics around the world.

The research was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH.

The results were presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2025 in Madrid and were also published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Significant Blood Pressure Reductions

After 12 weeks, patients taking baxdrostat (1 mg or 2 mg once daily in pill form) experienced an average drop in blood pressure of about 9 to 10 mmHg more than those taking a placebo. This level of reduction is considered large enough to lower the risk of cardiovascular events.

Around 40 percent of patients taking baxdrostat reached healthy blood pressure levels, compared with fewer than 20 percent in the placebo group.

Principal Investigator, Professor Williams, who is presenting the results at ESC, said: “Achieving a nearly 10 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure with baxdrostat in the BaxHTN Phase III trial is exciting, as this level of reduction is linked to substantially lower risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure and kidney disease.”

How Baxdrostat Targets a Key Hormone

Blood pressure is heavily influenced by a hormone called aldosterone, which helps regulate salt and water levels in the body.

In some individuals, the body produces too much aldosterone. This leads to excess salt and water retention, raising blood pressure and making it difficult to control.

Scientists have long tried to address this imbalance, but it has proven challenging.

Baxdrostat works by blocking the production of aldosterone, directly targeting a major cause of high blood pressure (hypertension).

A New Approach to Difficult Cases

Professor Williams, Chair of Medicine at UCL, said: “These findings are an important advance in treatment and in our understanding of the cause of difficult to control blood pressure.

“Around half of people treated for hypertension do not have it controlled, however this is a conservative estimate and the number is likely higher, especially as the target blood pressure we try to reach is now much lower than it was previously.[1]

“In patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension, the addition of baxdrostat 1mg or 2mg once daily to background antihypertensive therapy led to clinically meaningful reductions in systolic blood pressure, which persisted up to 32 weeks with no unanticipated safety findings.

“This suggests that aldosterone is playing an important role in causing difficult to control blood pressure in millions of patients and offers hope for more effective treatment in the future.”

Rising Global Burden and Future Potential

In the past, higher rates of hypertension were mainly seen in wealthier Western countries. However, changing diets, including reduced salt intake in some regions, have shifted the global burden. Today, far more cases are found in Eastern and lower income countries. More than half of all people with hypertension live in Asia, including 226 million in China and 199 million in India.[2]

Professor Williams added: “The results suggest that this drug could potentially help up to half a billion people globally — and as many as 10 million people in the UK alone, especially at the new target level for optimal blood pressure control.”

Notes

  1. The ESC 2024 hypertension guidelines recommended a target blood pressure of less than 130/80 mmHg. Prior to 2024 the target had been 140/90 mmHg.
  2. Figures from Blood Pressure UK
Share Button

Starmer’s Brexit Gamble: Will Labour Pay The Price For PM’s Desire For Closer EU Ties?

Keir Starmer loves the European Union. It is not controversial to point this out.

Few, if any, MPs did more to overturn the result of the 2016 Brexit referendum than the member for Holborn and St. Pancras.

As Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, Starmer led the charge – often against intense resistance from his own party colleagues – for a second referendum, and made no secret of the fact he would campaign to stay in the EU if it ever happened.

In the end, Jeremy Corbyn’s decision to support Boris Johnson’s call for a snap election in 2019 put paid to Starmer’s dream.

Johnson won a landslide victory and took the UK out of the bloc on January 31, 2020.

This neatly coincided with the Labour leadership contest, which Starmer won with a promise to “defend free movement as we leave the EU”.

That pledge, alongside the other nine he made during that campaign, were all quickly ditched once he was in post.

Indeed, the return of free movement remains a “red line” the government says it will not cross, alongside a return to the EU’s single market and customs union.

These positions were seen as a tactical necessity ahead of the 2024 election, for fear of angering the millions of previously-Labour voters who backed Brexit in 2016 and then Johnson’s Tories three years later.

Nevertheless, the prime minister and other senior government figures now feel emboldened enough to criticise Brexit and openly talk about seeking closer ties with the EU.

On Wednesday, Starmer was unequivocal.

Brexit “did deep damage to our economy”, the PM said, adding that the economic turmoil caused by the Iran war meant “the opportunities to strengthen our security and cut the cost of living…. are simply too big to ignore”.

Donald Trump’s relentless attacks on the UK, and Starmer, have weakened the trans-Atlantic alliance, giving Starmer more political cover to pursue a deeper relationship with Brussels.

“It is increasingly clear that as the world continues down this volatile path, our long-term national interest requires closer partnership with our allies in Europe and with the European Union,” he said.

His comments echo those of Rachel Reeves, who set out her aim of “breaking down trade barriers and deepening alliances with our European partners” as she delivered the Spring Statement a month ago.

Negotiations between the UK and EU are already taking place on youth mobility, food and drink, and the emissions trading scheme, with agreement set to be reached in time for a summit to be held in the summer.

A government source said: “The lightbulb moment happened for Europe with Trump’s Greenland stuff. He wound up the Danes and all of us with that stuff. Iran has made it all the more prescient.

“It gives us an opportunity to step up a programme that will help resilience across the EU, but which will also be in the UK national interest and benefit Britain.”

Keir Starmer speaking at the Russell Square Rally against Brexit on August 31, 2019.
Keir Starmer speaking at the Russell Square Rally against Brexit on August 31, 2019.

Nicola Tree via Getty Images

However, some in Labour believe the race to improve relations with the EU could come at a political cost, with the elections on May barely a month away.

One senior party figure told HuffPost UK: “I can see this appearing on every Reform leaflet in the country.

“Why do it about a week or two before the postal votes go out? Election day is not on May 7, it’s in a couple of weeks time when the postal votes go out, and all the Reform Facebook groups will be featuring this strongly.”

But a government insider rejected the suggestion that voters will seek to punish Labour for trying to cosy up to the EU.

“What we’ve tried to do since the general election is take voters on a bit of a journey and show that we are making deals that help our economy while still being true to spirit of Brexit.

“We’re sticking to our red lines on the single market and customs union, and getting a bespoke relationship with the EU while making use of our Brexit freedoms as well.

“People are not happy with the deal Johnson agreed, and can can make that link between issues at the border and prices on the shelves.

“People want to see the UK to go out and make deals with the EU while sticking to our red lines. Voters have moved on from 2016, they don’t want to relitigate the Brexit debate all over again.”

This view was supported by one Labour MP, who said: “Brexit was ten years ago. The government’s been firm in its EU red lines and is doing nothing which would undermine them.

“It’s the cost of living, precipitated by Trump’s war on Iran, which is fore of people’s minds. Set against the backdrop of increasing global uncertainty, striking a closer relationship with the EU is all the more important if it can bring down the cost of the weekly shop and reduce barriers for British businesses.”

Unsurprisingly, Reform UK have sought to capitalise, accusing the PM of betraying the 2016 result.

Deputy leader Richard Tice said it was “ludicrous” to suggest Britain should have closer ties to “a failing economic bloc that also has a long track record of failing to invest in defence”.

But Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Cabinet Office minister leading the EU negotiations told HuffPost UK: “Reform is betraying the future of young Brits.

Between Robert Jenrick axing EU travel for young people and Farage shredding trade deals, they’d rather pick a fight with Europe than protect people’s household finances.

“They’re obsessed with a harder Brexit that hits every household with a massive paperwork tax.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Share Button