The UK’s recent heatwave has ended (for now), meaning watering and mowing rules have gone back to normal for gardeners.
Still, a bowl of water left in your garden remains useful for animals like hedgehogs, and though this week is safer than last for trimming your grass, you might want to keep your cut shreds on the lawn.
Advertisement
And according to author and former garden manager for various Royal Horticultural Society and National Trust sites, Simon Akeroyd, apparently, we should be peeing in our watering cans too.
“Sorry if this horrifies you,” a recent Instagram Reel of his read, “But the key to successfully growing plants is natural fertiliser.”
Why pay for specially-made products, the gardener argued, when “you have free access to the best natural stuff out there” – pee?
Advertisement
How could pee possibly help plants grow?
Calling your very own liquid gold the “best plant food” out there, Akeroyd shared that wee is “high in the three main plant nutrients needed for healthy plant growth – nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
Nitrogen is key to plant health as it provides the building blocks of their DNA (though too much isn’t great for them either – nitrogen created by sewage can throw off the ecosystems of waterways, leading to too much algae).
That may be why Akeroyd recommends diluting your free plant feed “at a rate of about ten parts water to one part wee.”
Advertisement
Once placed in a watering can, t can be used to treat plants “once a week,” he added.
The expert isn’t alone – a 2017 paper published in Environmental Science and Technology reads, “Human urine contains significant amounts of N (nitrogen) and P (phosphorus); therefore, it has been successfully used as fertiliser in different crops.”
“Humans have been collecting urine and using it for fertiliser for a long, long time, but then in the west that really stopped with the invention of [the] sewage system,” Dr Krista Wigginton, who researched the topic, told The Guardian.
“We are just trying now to figure out with this infrastructure system that we have, how do we pull back and think differently about what goes into this sewage system and capture some of those valuable products before [they] get mixed and diluted with everything else?”
Advertisement
Does pee get rid of foxes?
Some people report that male human pee, and especially the first one of the day, can repel foxes by interrupting their scent markers.
“Once the fox’s scent has been masked, they will feel more vulnerable and leave your garden altogether. This is a free, effective, if not a bit strange way to get rid of foxes without killing them,” Shield Pest Control wrote.
Advertisement
As Black Foxes UK said, there’s no empirical evidence to prove this definitely works yet.
But hey – if you’re using it to feed your plants anyway, it might be a welcome side-effect.
Russia’s former transport minister has been found dead in his car just hours after it was revealed he had been sacked by Vladimir Putin.
Initial investigations suggest Roman Starovoit took his own life using a handgun.
In a statement, the Investigative Committee of Russia said: “The body of the former minister of transport of the Russian Federation, Roman Vladimirovich Starovoit, was discovered in his personal vehicle with a gunshot wound today in the Odintsovo city district.”
Advertisement
The statement added: “The main version is suicide.”
Andrei Kartapolov, head of the Russian parliament’s defence committee, said Starovoit had died “quite a while ago”.
Earlier on Monday, it was announced that Putin had sacked Starovoit after just over a year in the job.
He had been governor of the Kursk region, which borders Ukraine, for nearly five years before taking on his ministerial role.
Advertisement
Before Starovoit’s dismissal, Russian airlines had cancelled nearly 500 flights and delayed almost 2,000 since Saturday because of the threat of Ukrainian drones.
He was replaced as transport minister by his deputy, Andrei Nikitin.
A Kremlin spokesperson said: “At present, in the president’s opinion, Andrei Nikitin’s professional qualities and experience will best contribute to ensuring that this agency, which the president described as extremely important, fulfils its tasks and functions.”
Back in late 2023 before he was elected to parliament, Farage caused a huge stir by appearing in the hit reality TV show.
Advertisement
Even the programme’s hosts Ant and Dec urged producers to take a break from having politicians as contestants.
But, Farage still won over voters and ended up in third place.
More than 18 months later, a panel of voters who backed Labour last July told pollsters that his appearance on the show marked the moment they started warming up to the MP for Clacton.
In footage aired by the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, one voter told pollsters More in Common: “I really like Reform.
Advertisement
“I didn’t [like him], but it was I’m A Celeb… which turned my head for Nigel.
“I really saw a different side to him and I think he’s very misunderstood.”
“He’s more relatable to people, to the average person,” another woman said. “Whereas some politicians at the present seem far removed, they’re so in another world, because they are public school educated, they can’t relate to the average person.”
However, a different person did jump in at this point, saying: “Nigel Farage was publicly educated, while Keir Starmer is working class but he does present that.
“So Nigel Farage puts on this image of being one of the people, but actually he went to private school.”
Advertisement
Even so, some voters suggested they would fire Starmer for his “disappointing” performance over the last year unless he starts to “try harder”.
Good Morning Britain host Susanna Reid also told the BBC that this conversation demonstrated how voters “need to feel a material difference in their lives”.
She noted that they are still struggling with food inflation and cost of living, so the “government are getting this wrong”.
Advertisement
“Perhaps Sir Keir Starmer needs to go on I’m A Celebrity… or Strictly, in order for voters to know who he is,” Reid suggested. “The words that kept coming out of their mouths were: I don’t know who he is.”
The focus group’s findings were published to mark the anniversary of Labour’s landslide victory in the general election as political pundits look at how Starmer has fallen down in the polls ever since.
Advertisement
Sky News had its own devastating way of portraying Labour’s first year in office with some brutal word clouds, again from More in Common.
The pollsters asked the public: “In a word or two, what would you say has been Labour’s biggest achievement in government?”
The largest word by a healthy margin was “nothing”, although – in much smaller fonts – NHS, welfare, winter, election and Ukraine were all visible too.
Vladimir Putin has reportedly lost 16 Russian generals in battle since declaring war on Ukraine, according to the UK.
The British Ministry of Defence (MoD) claimed this loss has subsequently undermined command and control in some parts of the army.
Advertisement
The MoD also noted in its latest update on X that two senior generals have died so far in 2025 and five in the last 12 months alone.
The MoD said: “The loss of so many high-ranking officers is likely to have had the effect of undermining command and control in parts of the Russian Armed Forces.
“This has likely contributed to Russian tactical and operational difficulties during the conflict.”
The MoD confirmed that Major General Mikhail Gudkov was the latest to be killed in battle after a Ukrainian strike on a Russian command post.
Advertisement
He died on July 2 in the Kursk oblast in western Russia, the region Ukrainian troops seized in a surprise incursion last August.
Russia has claimed to have retaken the area completely since April, while Ukraine has maintained that the fighting is ongoing.
The MoD said: “It is likely Gudkov was directing marine infantry units attempts to establish a buffer zone in the Ukrainian oblast of Sumy.
Advertisement
“Russia’s advances in Sumy have slowed due to Ukrainian counterattacks and significant Russian losses.”
The MoD has previously claimed Russia has now surpassed a million military losses since Putin first invaded Ukraine back in February 2022.
Advertisement
Despite the staggering attrition rate and Donald Trump’s efforts to secure a peace deal, the Russian president has refused to compromise on any long-term ceasefire deals with Ukraine.
Only last month, he confirmed that he still wants to annex all of Ukraine.
“I have said many times that the Russian and Ukrainian people are one nation, in fact. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours,” Putin said.
The Conservatives have been accused of being “tone deaf” after the party’s strategy chief claimed they have “done the apologies”.
According to The Telegraph, a leaked recording has revealed that a top ally of leader Kemi Badenoch, Baroness Maclean, told supporters the Tories have “done the mea culpas” now.
Advertisement
Speaking to the Conservative Women’s Organisation on June 18, she said the last government had a “tendency to make announcements without thinking through how they would be delivered.”
But, Maclean – who ran Kemi Badenoch’s leadership campaign – claimed the Tories will now be able to move forward with new policies and rebuild their reputation.
“We’ve done the mea culpas, we’ve done the apologies, we’ve done all that,” she said in the recording.
Advertisement
The Tories were in power for 14 years until they were unceremoniously kicked out of 10 Downing Street in last July’s general election.
Their historic defeat saw them reduced to just 121 MPs.
A year on, the party continue to decline in the polls as voters repeatedly punish them for their time in government.
Pollsters at Ipsos found the Tories were on just 15% in June, a distant third behind their right-wing rivals Reform (34%) and Labour (25%).
Advertisement
The Telegraph’s report comes after Badenoch issued an apology to business leaders, promising they were the “natural party of business”.
She added that she was “sorry if at any time over the last 14 years we did not seem like that.”
Responding to the leaked recording, Labour Party chair Ellie Reeves slammed the Tories for being “out of touch”.
She said: “It shows just how out of touch the Tories are that they believe they have said sorry for their 14 years of failure in government.
Advertisement
“The Conservatives crashed the economy and left working people picking up the tab with sky-high mortgages and rocketing bills. Yet they haven’t apologised even once for their dismal record.
“The Tories’ attitude to the mess they made is completely tone deaf. It’s the same old Tories – they haven’t learned a thing.”
Similarly, Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: “The Conservatives are completely deluded if they think the public have forgiven or forgotten the mess they’ve left behind.
Advertisement
“This is a slap in the face for families still paying out more for their mortgage because Liz Truss tanked the economy.
“Kemi Badenoch should urgently confirm whether she agrees with her own senior official on this, or if she will properly apologise to all those who suffered due to years of Conservative chaos under the government in which she served.”
A Reform UK MP has suspended himself from the party over allegations about “business propriety during the pandemic”.
James McMurdock removed the whip from himself after being contacted by The Sunday Times.
The paper approached him about £70,000 in government Covid “bounce back” loans he allegedly took out in 2020 and 2021 for two firms he owned.
In a statement, Reform MP Lee Anderson said: “I have today received a call from James McMurdock who has advised me, as chief whip, that he has removed the party whip from himself pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations that are likely to be published by a national newspaper.
“The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before he became an MP.”
He said the party “take these matters very seriously and James has agreed to cooperate in full with any investigation”.
McMurdock was elected the MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock last year.
It later emerged that he was jailed nearly 20 years ago for repeatedly kicking his then girlfriend.
At the time, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he was “a fine young man who’s turned out really very, very well”.
McMurdock is the second of the five Reform MPs elected last July to no longer have the party whip.
Rupert Lowe was suspended by the party in March amid allegations of bullying, which he denied, and now also sits as an independent MP in the Commons.
I couldn’t have been more than 19 years old when, as a happy-go-lucky UCLA student, I looked down at my penis and decided I was dying.
Cancer, I thought, noticing small red bumps at the tip of my penis. Since I wasn’t having sex with anyone — not for lack of trying, I might add — what else could they be? I was doomed before it was even legal for me to drink.
A quick trip to the university’s emergency room followed, where, under harsh lights, a female doctor held and studied my genitals, then, in front of a female nurse, broke out into laughter.
Advertisement
“My husband has those,” she told me. “They’re varicose veins in an uncommon place. Nothing to worry about. Go Bruins!”
It turns out, I had a lot to worry about… but not for reasons the doctor dismissed.
As a young, gay actor who moved to New York City right after college, in 1987, having red bumps on my penis wasn’t exactly the invitation to sex that I was hoping to find. Not every guy I slept with noticed, but the ones who did often thought they were a sign of AIDS, herpes or god knows what else. I’ve never forgotten the man who said, simply, that I was “a whore,” and, since he was in a relationship with another man, he couldn’t take any risks. Um, kettle…?
That said, jovially saying to guys, “relax, they’re just varicose veins,” didn’t work as well as my former doctor insinuated. Perhaps I should have had her write a note.
Advertisement
In reality, who could really blame these men for being suspicious? Guys were dropping dead from AIDS on a daily basis, and vigilance was everything. I spent a lot of time trying to have sex in the dark or simply praying that guys wouldn’t examine my tip too closely. Many a hard-on was deflated just worrying one of my hook-ups would suddenly scream out, “Dude, what’s wrong with your dick?!” One guy did just that.
Even in the midst of the AIDS pandemic, I slept with a lot of strangers (I always used protection for intercourse), and to them, I was just another dick — pun intended. I’m certain that, if the situation had been reversed, I’d have had a difficult time believing the varicose vein story, too.
During the periods when I had steady boyfriends, the situation diminished because they trusted me and knew I wouldn’t place them in harm’s way. (Although I’ve read reports to the contrary, I’ve never once had one of the blood vessels break, during sex or otherwise.)
Advertisement
However, even those men weren’t always polite about my “deformity.” One guy I dated for a long time told me that having oral sex with me was like eating ice cream with nuts — and he didn’t like nuts. Charmed!
Courtesy of David Toussaint
The author when he was in college
I’ve spent a lot of my life single, though, and as I grew older in a new century, I learned that no matter what time of life you choose to be sex-positive, there will always be a target on your back from groups who find sex with multiple partners shameful.
Advertisement
I also found that as I got older, most complaints would come from men much younger than myself. Being a “Dilf” or a “Daddy” has been a sweet time of life for me, but the sexual scrutiny from millennials and Generation Z has become more intense. I’ve had guys show up at my door and get naked, then, after foreplay, examine my penis like I was having a medical exam. Some were polite when they walked out the door, some were not.
Since this rarely happens with men close to my age, I chalked it up to retro-fear of older men — an AIDS-era residue that meant those of us who were sexually active during that horrifying time were still physically scarred.
By 2022, I’d had enough. I was seeing a man 20 years younger than myself and having a great time, until the night he abruptly stopped oral sex and demanded to know why I had bumps on my penis. I told him they’d always been there and that he’d just never noticed, which he didn’t believe, and he said he never wanted to see or talk to me again. I’ve not spoken to him since.
Advertisement
I immediately made an appointment with my doctor, pulled down my pants in the office, and asked if there was anything that could be done about my grotesque abnormality.
After yet another bright-light examination, mixed in with small talk of his impending wedding and honeymoon, he told me that, contrary to what my initial doctor said, the bumps were not varicose veins, but more than likely angiokeratoma, benign blood vessels that form on the skin. His diagnosis was delivered in a tone so carefree I definitely wanted him to write a note to future lovers.
He gave me a referral to an excellent dermatologist in New York, Dr. Bradley Glodny, who, when he studied my penis — sometimes I think my flaccid package has gotten more attention than the stiff version — confirmed that I had genital angiokeratoma, and said that, for an affordable price, he could remove them via laser.
Advertisement
“Yes, please,” I said faster than he could turn on the equipment to fix my equipment.
When I told him that my dates were often repulsed by my groin area, he asked, flatly, “What kind of people do you go out with?”
Fair point.
I haven’t always been the best judge of character when hormones get in the way.
“What I’m baffled by — and what shocks me upon reflection — is that I ignored seeking help for my condition for 40 years, and, just as insane, I took the opinion of one doctor without seeking a second opinion.”
A week of healing went by, and, as promised, almost all of the bumps disappeared (some were too tiny to remove). My self-esteem and self-confidence jumped up 100%, and my sex life since then has become substantially more fulfilling. I had no idea that hearing Dr. Glodny say that one word could change everything.
Advertisement
In the bedroom, I’ve become, like, “Hey, feel free to examine my penis. Nice, isn’t it?” and “Sure, we can have sex in bright light. Sounds like fun!”
Since an internet search returned lopsided statistics on how many people have my condition, I asked Dr. Glodny for his thoughts.
“While I cannot give you an exact statistic, I believe that most men over the age of 30 have at least a few angiokeratomas in their genital area,” he said, adding that they become more prevalent as we age.
Advertisement
What I’m baffled by — and what shocks me upon reflection — is that I ignored seeking help for my condition for 40 years, and, just as insane, I took the opinion of one doctor without seeking a second opinion. Varicose veins run in my family, and I have them on my legs, so it did seem like a legit diagnosis. But doctors, lest we forget, are simply professionals with theories, and should always be questioned.
Part of me was embarrassed, too, to even discuss such a sensitive part of my anatomy with a stranger, let alone have them examine it. Clearly, I’ve grown up on that front. I hope that if you’re reading this and have any skin condition that scares or confuses you, you won’t be as stubborn as I was and seek help immediately.
I don’t regret having an active sex life — quite the opposite. But I should have been more dismissive of the men who disbelieved me when I told them they were safe. I accepted humiliation in the hopes that I could score some hot ass. (Remember the guy who called me a liar? I recently reached out to him so he could see the “new and improved” me. He never responded, and, frankly, I think I dodged a bullet.)
Advertisement
Like most guys I know, I want all of my body to be appreciated — the muscles, the hairy chest, the penis. We all have physical imperfections, wherever and whatever they may be. When we are humiliated on any level, it only increases the kind of body fascism that needs to be eradicated.
Laser removal for angiokeratoma doesn’t last forever, and I have them tweaked about once a year. Yeah, it hurts — a lot. Yes, insurance doesn’t cover it because it’s considered cosmetic. And, yes, I have to go off the market for a good week or two afterward. But at this point in my life, skipping out on the procedure and going back to hiding in the sexual shadows would be just plain nuts.
David Toussaint is a four-time book author, journalist, professional screenwriter and playwright, and actor. He lives in Manhattan with his pug, Deja.
A sex toy can be an exciting and confidence-boosting gift to buy for yourself.
But is such an intimate item ever an appropriate thing to give as a gift to someone else, particularly if you don’t have a sexual or romantic relationship with them?
According to sexologists and relationship experts, the answer is… it depends.
Who should you give a sex toy to?
“Gifting a sex toy to a friend can be a fun, empowering gesture – but context and consent matter,” said Rachel Needle, a licensed psychologist and co-director of Modern Sex Therapy Institute.
Advertisement
“It’s usually appropriate when you have the kind of relationship where sex and pleasure are openly discussed, and you’re confident they’d receive it in the spirit it’s intended: playful, supportive, or celebratory.”
She recommended considering their sense of humour, comfort level and any cultural or religious beliefs that might influence their response to such a gift.
“Are they someone who celebrates their sensuality? Do they feel safe exploring? Trust your intuition, and always come from a place of love and respect,” said relationship therapist and sexologist Joy Berkheimer. “The goal of the gift should be to uplift, not to pry or push boundaries.”
Advertisement
Think about the closeness of your relationship as well.
“If your friendship is open, playful, and you’ve talked about sex before, then you probably have a green light, and a pleasure toy can be a great gift,” said Sadie Allison, a sexologist, author and founder of sex toy retailer TickleKitty.
“‘Giving the gift of pleasure’ is thoughtful and unique, and you’re almost always guaranteed a big smile out of it.”
Avoiding the awkward – and keeping it classy
Allison suggested giving your friend a sex toy as a gift for their bachelorette party or birthday – or as a self-love boost, perhaps after a breakup. As for specific products, consider if they’re more reserved or new to sex toys.
Advertisement
“In those cases, keep it subtle and pick a beginner-friendly product,” she said, recommending “a rechargeable bullet vibe that’s small and not intimidating” or pleasure lubricant.
“Have they expressed curiosity about toys or pleasure products?” Needle said. “If you’re unsure, err on the side of caution or opt for a gift card to a reputable sexual wellness store, which gives them the autonomy to choose.”
She emphasised that presentation is everything when it comes to giving such an intimate gift.
“Keep it classy, light-hearted, and respectful,” Needle advised. “Avoid public gifting unless you’re 100% sure they’ll love the attention.”
Advertisement
In larger group situations like a party, ask yourself whether your friend would be OK opening this gift in front of the other guests present.
“If you feel it may be awkward, give it to them on the side and let them know there’s something ‘frisky’ inside as a heads-up,” Allison said.
Irena Sowinska via Getty Images
Context and consent are important when it comes to this kind of gift and how you present it.
Advertisement
You don’t need to go overboard with the gift wrapping, either. “Wrap it like you would any other thoughtful gift – no gag wrapping unless that’s clearly your shared vibe,” Needle said.
She also suggested including a little note with the gift, sharing why you thought of it for them – “because everyone deserves some self-love” or “you don’t need them” after a break-up.
“Try something like, ‘I saw this and thought of you, hope it adds a little spark and joy to your journey,’” Berkheimer said. “Keep it simple, genuine, and free of shame or judgment.”
Advertisement
If you think they’ll be surprised by the gift, a little card can provide some context and reassurance.
“If you’re nervous, pairing it with a more traditional item ― like bath products or a wellness-themed gift basket ― can soften the edges while still making a statement,” Needle said.
When it’s not a good idea to give sex toys
As noted, consent and context are incredibly important. Although times have changed and sex toys are less stigmatised, this kind of gift could cross boundaries, cause discomfort or even be considered harassment under the wrong circumstances.
Advertisement
If you don’t know this person very well and have never discussed intimacy or pleasure, you probably aren’t in the type of relationship where this would be an appropriate gift. If you’re on the fence, you could ask to gauge how they’d feel about that kind of present, but be respectful of the answer.
For someone with whom you have a professional relationship where specific power dynamics are at play, this kind of gift would also probably be a no-no.
Clinical psychologist and sex and intimacy coach Lori Beth Bisbey believes gifting a sex toy to a platonic friend can feel easy and uncomplicated if it’s someone you talk with about partners and sex. But advises to be mindful of situations where you have a different motive, though.
Advertisement
“If there is a flirtation between you, you need to be more careful about gifting a sex toy,” she said. “You need to be clear with yourself as to why you are giving this toy and what message you are trying to send. I would suggest thinking twice if the friend doesn’t know you have an interest in them.”
Sometimes a moment can capture the political mood better than any speech or parliamentary vote.
Leaving 10 Downing Street en route to his ministerial car before prime minister’s questions on Wednesday, a walk of only a few steps which he has made hundreds of times in the past year, Keir Starmer stumbled.
As his right leg began to give way, the prime minister instinctively reached out to grab the nearest railing to steady himself.
Advertisement
In the grand scheme of things it was a minor mishap. No harm done, let’s just move on.
But for a PM under pressure and whose very political existence is now the subject of open speculation at Westminster, it wasn’t a great look.
If he can’t even leave the house without nearly falling flat on his face, you could hear his critics thinking, how on earth can he run the country?
Underlining how difficult things are right now for Starmer, worse was to follow less than an hour later, as he ploughed his way through PMQs seemingly unaware that his chancellor was in tears beside him.
Advertisement
We may never know the real reason for Rachel Reeves’ distress, but the message it seemed to convey to the country was unmistakeable: just a year on from Labour’s landslide election victory, this is a government which already seems to be emotionally and politically spent.
“They haven’t got a narrative and the whole thing’s a mess.”
The previous evening, the PM had been forced to make yet another U-turn in order to ensure the government’s flagship Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payments Bill was passed at second reading.
Advertisement
The fact that it no longer contains anything at all on personal independence payments demonstrates how much Starmer had to give away to win the support of enough of his rebellious MPs.
The climbdown meant that the £5 billion of savings the welfare reforms were supposed to deliver have now disappeared, leaving the chancellor to plan yet more tax rises to fill the gap.
As a backdrop to Starmer’s first anniversary in the job, it was far from ideal.
“They’ve got a huge majority, but they haven’t got a narrative and the whole thing’s a mess,” said one gloomy Labour veteran.
Advertisement
“I was talking to a senior businessman who said on the day-to-day stuff, the government is actually getting a lot of things right. But fundamentally it’s a shitshow.
“This weekend we should be celebrating the first anniversary of a famous victory, which was an outstanding achievement, but instead we’ve gone straight to the massive hangover.”
Starmer felt compelled to warn his cabinet this week about briefing against Morgan McSweeney, the PM’s chief of staff who has become a lightning rod for criticism of the No.10 operation.
Advertisement
Reeves’s strict adherence to her fiscal rules, which are aimed at keeping a tight rein on government spending, has also been blamed for the government’s woes.
Labour MPs feel worn down by having to defend unpopular government decisions like removing winter fuel payments from 10 million pensioners, only for the PM to eventually U-turn on them when the political heat gets too much.
One senior Labour figure told HuffPost UK that Starmer has it in his gift to lift the gloom, but he doesn’t have any time to waste.
Advertisement
“They’ve got three years to recover,” he said. “It’s perfectly doable, but they need to be getting back on track very quickly. Luckily, the Tories are still all over the place. Reform are obviously a problem, but it is a recoverable situation.
“Basically, Keir needs to get a grip. He has to shake things up and some people’s egos will get bruised in the process, but in the end we’ve got to move on.
“Does he want to be remembered as the man who re-established the party and set us on a forward path or does he want to be remembered as the man who blew it?”
Advertisement
“Keir needs to get a grip. He has to shake things up.”
One Labour MP said the government needs to get on and deliver the change that the country voted for a year ago.
“There has to be an improvement in living standards,” he said. “If we don’t make people feel better off, then we will suffer at the next election.”
Advertisement
The MP warned that Nigel Farage will be the main beneficiary if Starmer doesn’t get his and the government’s act together soon.
He said: “Nobody said it was going to be easy. There’s no political patience out there. People feel worn down and want to see improvements tomorrow, and if they don’t then they’ll vote for Reform.”
There is anger inside No.10 towards the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), who many believe are either unable or unwilling to accept the parlous state of the public finances means tough decisions need to be made.
Advertisement
In the wake of the welfare reform fiasco, one MP was even overheard saying: “I don’t understand why this means tax rises when it’s only a few billion pounds.”
Flushed with the success of forcing the PM to U-turn on welfare cuts, some rebels made it clear they will now try to force him to scrap the two-child benefit cap – a move that would come with a £3.5bn price tag.
That prompted one No.10 insider to observe: “They are aware they’ve just spent that money, right?”
A cabinet minister told HuffPost UK it was time for some Labour backbenchers to come into the real world.
Advertisement
“You can’t have a situation where MPs club together and force a decision that costs £5bn and then dump all the consequences on the chancellor,” he said.
“If these things are collectively decided, they need to be collectively owned. The PLP can’t think this is a free lunch, that we’ll move on next to something like the two-child benefit cap and say the chancellor will have to deal with that. It’s been very unfair to load all that on her.
“Labour MPs think somehow somebody else will deal with it, that you can tax more or borrow more and it’ll all be fine. But when you tax private schools, farmers, businesses, there’s always a big pushback. There isn’t a free little lever that you can just pull.”
Advertisement
rime Minister Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves
via Associated Press
French president Emmanuel Macron is in London next week to address parliament and hold talks with Starmer on how France can work with the UK to stop asylum seekers crossing the Channel in small boats.
Bringing down immigration was a key Labour pledge in the election, and yet the number of asylum seekers making the perilous journey is at a record high.
Advertisement
Party strategists believe fulfilling that promise is essential if the government is to show voters that it is delivering.
But Chris Hopkins, political research director at pollsters Savanta, said it may already be too late for Starmer.
“I’m not sure he can turn things around,” he said. “It’s too early to completely write them off – we’ve seen far stranger things than a Labour comeback – but public opinion is far easier to lose than win back and the prospects for this government don’t look good.
Advertisement
“They lack the policy agenda to capture voters’ imagination, they lack the fiscal headroom to bring about tangible changes to people’s lives, and they’re not proving themselves to be united, competent or strong either.
“It’s no surprise at this stage that so many 2024 Labour voters have buyer’s remorse, and when the Tories and Labour fail, the untested alternatives suddenly look significantly less risky for an increasingly promiscuous electorate.
“Labour’s electoral coalition was always going to be difficult to hold together, but I think the speed and scale of the collapse from such a strong position is a surprise, and exactly what the country didn’t need from its next government.”
Advertisement
Starmer will spend his anniversary weekend away from Downing Street, and his allies insist he will not be brooding on the turmoil of recent days.
“He’s not someone that sits and dwells on things,” said on senior government official. “There are obviously lessons to be learned, but he’s focused on what we can do to fix things rather than spend all his time chewing over the past week.”
Labour’s first 12 months in office have been marked by a series of self-inflicted errors, gaffes, controversies and climbdowns.
Advertisement
The next election may not be until 2029, but Starmer and those around him know that he cannot afford for the next year to be as bad as the last one.
As someone with insomnia, I struggle to get to sleep in the first place. I’m not alone – 21% of us find it hard to nod off at least once a week.
So when we do finally reach dreamland, it’s pretty unpleasant to be yanked out of it by heartburn or indigestion.
Advertisement
One paper called nighttime heartburn an “under-appreciated clinical problem that impacts sleep and daytime function” among adults with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Meanwhile, some researchers think indigestion and acid reflux create a vicious cycle; they affect your sleep, which may in turn increase your risk of indigestion, and so on.
Though you should see a GP if you have indigestion often, if it comes alongside other symptoms (like iron deficiency anaemia, pain, trouble swallowing, and weight loss), doctors like GI surgeon Dr Karan Rajan say that sleeping on one side over another may help for one-off cases.
Advertisement
Don’t sleep on your right side
Your stomach is not a perfectly balanced or symmetrical organ.
Instead, it’s curved, with much of its bulk (which contains the acid that causes indigestion and heartburn) lying on the left-hand side.
That bend means that it’s harder for stomach acid to make its way into your oesophagus because it’s got a steeper curve to climb than your more gently sloping right-hand side.
Per the Gastrointestinal Society: “Due to gravity, the shape of the stomach, and the angle of the connection between it and the oesophagus, sleeping on your left side can greatly reduce reflux.”
Advertisement
“By the same principle, if you lie on your right-hand side, at this point the stomach and its contents are slightly higher than the lowest of your sphincter,” Dr Karan Rajan agreed.
That means “more chance of reflux back into the oesophagus,” which creates that horrid indigestion burn.
What else can I do to reduce the risk of nighttime indigestion?
The NHS says that indigestion is common and is usually “not a sign of anything more serious… you can treat it yourself.”
Advertisement
Solutions can include cutting down on coffee, tea, and booze, raising your stomach above your head when you sleep and avoiding eating closer than thre to four hours before bedtime.
Skip spicy, fatty foods if you’re struggling with indigestion, don’t smoke, and speak to your pharmacist about getting over-the-counter treatments if needed.
The health service adds you should see a GP if you: