This 10-In-1 Steam Mop Feels Like ‘A Cleaning Carnival That I Never Want To Leave’

Cleaning can be an inevitable, repetitive chore that’s hard on the body and the mind. Of course, as you kind of have to do it regularly, you may as well try to make it as easy as possible. Lucky for you, we spotted a 10-in-1, versatile, lightweight steam cleaner that reviewers love for tackling stubborn messes all around their home, without needing to bend or strain. In fact, this thing makes chores so enjoyable reviewers call it a “magical contraption” that’s “like a cleaning carnival that I never want to leave.” Even better? This thing is currently on sale for under $70, the lowest price it’s been in weeks.

Weighing less than 5 pounds, fans say this thing makes cleaning easier, as bending and lifting get harder.

Whether you’re tackling tiles, toilets, windows, carpets, stove tops, furniture or even clothing, this versatile steamer cleaner is there to make it a whole lot easier. With over a dozen attachments, including a carpet glider, window squeegee, scraper tool, garment cloth, scrub brush and scouring pad, it’s a one-time buy you’ll keep finding new uses for.

The removable shaft offers 4-5 feet of extra reach, eliminating bending, reaching and straining, with a 13-foot extension cord for extra room. Or, rock with the detachable handheld steamer for cleaning tight corners, bathrooms, windows and more. However you use it, fans say the slender machine is “lightweight and portable,” and demands “minimal effort” to use — making it a great option for older folks or people with mobility limitations.

“Getting older means it’s harder to reach into that tub and scrub! Not anymore,” shopper Tessa wrote. “This has made my life so much easier. I actually use it for many things. I don’t know what I’d do without it now!” “Our family no longer has to use elbow grease to clean the shower walls and tub,” another wrote. “My dad who’s 80 years old loves to use it to clean. This is a godsend to use.”

Many say the machine is ideal “if you’re getting older or are just over breaking your back scrubbing bathtubs and showers by hand.”

“I have arthritis in my back and I’m 4’11 and I can’t believe how easy this made scrubbing the bath tub and how easy it made getting to top corners of the ceiling,” Jessie wrote. “It’s back on the charger as we speak so I can go for downstairs and clean the other 2 bathrooms!!”

Another shopper with self-described “physical limitations” said their floors and bathroom were never as clean as they wanted. Yet, after trying this “incredibly sturdy, and very well-made” tool, they feel better in their space. “…I can get behind the toilet with this thing! Even do the corners that are curved in my shower! The tile walls! And oh my gosh cleaning the baseboards? Wow,” they said. “Don’t waste your money trying anything different, this is the one!”

In fact, one user, who was physically unable to clean their tub writes they almost paid a professional cleaner to do it, before grabbing this tool, calling it an “affordable gamble” “I am so pleased,” they wrote. “…The higher speed was a little much for me but the normal speed started to make those deep set stains disappear. I am doing small sections at a time. But the difference between what I have done and what I need to do is amazing.”

It’s so fast, versatile, effective and even …fun — you’ll be looking for more to clean around the house.

With a 10-second heat-up time and an army of attachment heads, fans say this cleaner isn’t just powerful — it’s enjoyable to use. Releasing up to 248 degrees of steam for 12-15 minutes of continuous cleaning (between water tank refills), it removes the need for stinky cleaners and chemicals, allowing you to tackle messes simply with water and heat. Because it makes chores so effortless, shoppers say they actually look forward to using it.

“I used to dread cleaning, but with this magical contraption, it’s become strangely… dare I say it… FUN?!” shopper Scarlett wrote. “…I’ve caught myself giggling while tackling stubborn stains because, honestly, who knew cleaning could be so entertaining?”

Shoppers say it’s the type of purchase that once you use it, you’ll wonder how you ever lived without it, as it cuts home cleaning in effort but also time.

“This scrubber moves faster than a caffeinated cheetah with a turbo boost,” Scarlett said. “…I’ve even started timing myself to see if I can beat my own record. It’s like a game show, and the prize is a squeaky clean home.”

“I deep cleaned a whole bathroom in less than 15 minutes,” Trisha wrote. “My stove and oven looks new. My baseboards and trim look amazing! I’m still trying to find more things to scrub, I seriously love this product.”

Some love it so much, they’ve started recommending and even gifting it to their friends.

“As I get older, it’s more difficult to scrub the shower and tub, but this device made it easy and saved me from a backache later in the day,” Rebecca wrote, noting “I liked this so well, that I recommended the electric spin scrubber to my friends and family.”

Reviewers love this 10-in-1 steam mop for making home cleaning easier and more enjoyable. Read more 5-star reviews and grab one for yourself while it’s on sale — your back will thank you.

Getting older means it’s harder to reach into that tub and scrub! Not anymore! This has made my life so much easier. I actually use it for many things. I don’t know what i’d do without it now!” — tessa burch

“This is beyond my expectations. It is so easy to use and works so well. Hate to admitted I am a getting a little older and being on the ground scrubbing shower floors just isn’t possible. This was so quick and easy to use. Cleaned very well, even in the corners.”Heather Frost

Ummm where has this thing been my whole life?! I deep cleaned a whole bathroom in less than 15 minutes. My stove and oven looks new. My baseboards and trim look amazing! I’m still trying to find more things to scrub, I seriously love this product. The spinner does not stop or sputter when pressure is applied. If you’re getting older or are just over breaking your back scrubbing bathtubs and showers by hand, buy this!!” — Trisha

“Oh boy, hold on to your mop handles because this automatic scrubber brush is about to take your cleaning game on a wild ride! 🌪️ I mean, seriously, who needs a calm, leisurely cleaning session when you can have a tornado of cleanliness instead? I strapped into this cleaning rollercoaster, and boy, am I still catching my breath from the exhilarating ride! Let’s talk about zipping through cleaning tasks – this scrubber moves faster than a caffeinated cheetah with a turbo boost! I used to spend hours and hours scrubbing away at grime, but now I feel like I’ve turned into a cleaning ninja on a mission. The dirt doesn’t stand a chance! I’ve even started timing myself to see if I can beat my own record. It’s like a game show, and the prize is a squeaky clean home. But wait, there’s more! Not only does this scrubber save time, but it also transforms cleaning into a dance party. Picture this: you, me, and the scrubber, all grooving to the rhythm of sparkling floors and shining tiles. I’ve named mine Scrubby McScrubFace, and we’ve become quite the dynamic duo. It’s like we’re partners in crime, except our crime is committing germ genocide. Now, let’s get real for a second. I used to dread cleaning, but with this magical contraption, it’s become strangely… dare I say it… FUN?! It’s like a cleaning carnival that I never want to leave. I’ve caught myself giggling while tackling stubborn stains because, honestly, who knew cleaning could be so entertaining? In summary, if you’re looking for a cleaning sidekick that’s faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, and able to scrub tall messes in a single pass, then this automatic scrubber brush is your hero. It’s turned my cleaning routine into a wild adventure, and I’m giving it a solid 5 stars for making cleanliness a blast. So go ahead, embrace the hurricane of awesomeness, and let the cleaning frenzy begin! 🌟🧼🎉” — Scarlett Tribo

The Real Deal: We use deal trackers and commerce experience to sift through “fake” hike-and-drop deals and other deceptive sales tactics. Products will usually be rated at least 4 stars with a minimum 15% discount. (And when there’s an exception, we’ll tell you why.)

Share Button

Huge Savings Alert: Here’s How To Get Up To £850 Off When You Buy The New Google Pixel 11 Pro

We don’t need to tell you this: tech is expensive. Keeping up to date with the latest gadgets can put a serious dent in your wallet, but the price tag doesn’t do much to quell our desires for a new phone.

Especially when one as enticing as the Google Pixel 11 Pro drops.

Available for pre-order now, and to buy from 20 August, the Pixel 11 Pro comes in four shades (Canyon pink, Olive green, Fog blue and Obsidian black).

The phone retails at £1,079, which is up nearly £500 from the Pixel 10. But, good news Google heads: you can get it for less when you trade in an old device.

Eligible devices include phones from Google, Samsung, and Apple, among tons of other brands, so if you’ve been thinking about switching to Google, this is as good a chance as any.

Depending on the phone you’re trading, you could save up to £850, which in case you need a little help with the maths, means your new phone could cost as little as £229. Woah.

When you consider the array of upgrades Google has made from its predecessor, the Pixel 10, that’s an insane steal.

The first Google phone to use its Tensor G6 chip, it’s considerably speedier than the Pixel 10, with Google claiming you’ll see 25% speedier browsing and 3.5 times faster Gemini processing.

Speaking of, the Pixel 11 Pro is loaded with Gemini Intelligence, which can help you with everything from brainstorming to finding information.

The camera is often the most important aspect of a phone (for us, at least) and this one delivers big time. Pixel 11 boasts Google’s longest zoom yet (up to a whopping 120x) and 30% better light sensitivity so your photos always come out looking crisp and sharp.

One of our favourite elements is Magic Capture mode, which means you can simply press a single button to let your phone take over the heavy lifting of taking photos and videos, so you don’t have to think about the best mode to capture the moment.

The offer runs until 1 September, so run, don’t walk – because you could miss out on £850 in savings on the Pixel 11 Pro as well as up to £260 when you trade in a smart watch for the new Google Pixel Watch 5.

Share Button

So That’s Why Breastfeeding Makes You Feel Wiped Out

The first year after a baby is born can be a complete blur for new parents – I’ve been there twice, and I feel like I was delirious for about 90% of it.

Between the sleep deprivation, the constant state of high alert and the mental and physical recovery, it’s really no wonder so many new parents feel so exhausted.

Those who choose to breastfeed might also notice this makes them feel more wiped – even after months of milk production. (I breastfed for two years and felt just as exhausted by year two than I did earlier on in my journey.)

Google searches for “does breastfeeding make you tired?” have gone up by more than 5,000% recently, according to analysis by Proceive Breastfeeding. The answer is certainly, yes. But why?

Why does breastfeeding make you SO tired?

Well, there are several reasons.

Dr Nikki Ramskill, a GP verified on the healthcare review platform Doctify, and founder of The Female Health Doctor Clinic, told HuffPost UK: “Firstly, your body is doing a huge amount of work behind the scenes. Prolactin, the hormone responsible for milk production, naturally has a calming, sleepy effect, and levels rise overnight.

“Producing breast milk also requires extra energy, roughly 300-500 calories a day, at a time when your body is still recovering from pregnancy and birth.”

Broken sleep will also play a part. “It’s not always about how many hours you’re getting in total. If you’re waking every couple of hours to feed, you’re repeatedly being pulled out of the deeper, restorative stages of sleep,” Dr Ramskill explained.

“You can technically have had six or seven hours of sleep across a night and still wake up feeling absolutely shattered.”

Does breastfeeding make you tired?
Does breastfeeding make you tired?

There’s the nutrient loss to consider, too. Registered nutritionist Charlotte Grand, who works with Proceive, said: “The mother’s body prioritises the baby above all else. Breastfeeding actively draws critical micronutrients, including B vitamins, vitamin D, zinc, and iron, directly from the mother’s tissue stores to ensure the milk is perfectly balanced.

“Because this continuous nutrient loss drains her internal reserves, it can quickly lead to systemic depletion and profound fatigue if those vitamins are not actively replenished.”

And as if all of that wasn’t enough, there’s another factor that can be fuelling breastfeeding fatigue over the summer – and that’s the hot weather. In Japan, summer exhaustion has an actual name: “natsubate”.

“During a heatwave, your body has to work much harder to keep your core temperature in a safe range,” Dr Ginni Mansberg, a GP and co-founder of ESK, previously told us. “That means diverting blood to the skin, increasing sweating and making your heart work a little harder.”

When it’s hot, you’re at risk of dehydration – and breastfeeding increases your fluid requirements, so it becomes even easier to become dehydrated. Dr Ramskill noted even mild dehydration can leave you feeling tired, headachy and generally wiped out.

What can I do about it?

Thankfully, there are a few ways to help try and ease the feeling of fatigue.

Dr Ramskill suggested keeping a bottle of water next to you every time you feed, and making sure you’re eating enough. “I’d favour small, regular meals or snacks containing protein and iron rather than trying to keep yourself functioning on caffeine and sugary snacks,” she added.

Grand recommended also introducing a supplement to replace the micronutrients being depleted. (Proceive offer one, as do brands like Vitabiotics and Wild Nutrition).

She also urges mums to “honour the prolactin window”. Explaining this further, she said: “Since prolactin naturally induces drowsiness during a feed, mothers should try to align their rest with the baby’s schedule where possible. Even a 20-minute resting block immediately following a morning feed can help reset the nervous system.”

Don’t assume extreme tiredness is caused by breastfeeding

“Postpartum blood loss, combined with the iron demands of breastfeeding, makes subclinical iron deficiency a major driver of fatigue,” said Grand, who advised incorporating iron-rich foods (like lean meats, lentils, and leafy greens) alongside vitamin C (which optimises iron absorption).

Dr Ramskill agrees, noting that iron deficiency and anaemia are “incredibly common” after pregnancy, particularly in those who lost a significant amount of blood during birth.

Signs of iron deficiency anaemia can include: tiredness, lack of energy, shortness of breath, heart palpitations, looking paler than usual and headaches.

“B12, vitamin D and thyroid function are also worth considering if the exhaustion feels excessive or simply isn’t improving,” the GP added.

“Postpartum thyroid problems, for example, can easily be mistaken for the normal tiredness and upheaval of having a new baby.”

Most new mums are going to be tired – but that doesn’t mean it should be ignored. Don’t be afraid to ask your support network for help with feeds or taking the baby so you can get some rest.

And if the tiredness feels overwhelming, is getting worse rather than better, or doesn’t improve at all when you do manage to rest, speak to your GP.

“Symptoms such as breathlessness, dizziness, palpitations, significant weight changes, feeling unusually hot or cold, or heavy or prolonged bleeding are also worth investigating,” claimed Dr Ramskill.

“And I’d pay particular attention to mental health. Persistent low mood, anxiety, intrusive thoughts or feeling unable to cope shouldn’t simply be put down to being a tired new mum.”

Share Button

Perez Hilton’s Family Say Celebrity Blogger Is Receiving Inpatient Treatment

Perez Hilton is receiving inpatient treatment two weeks after he was hospitalised following a mental health episode in which he appeared to self-harm during a TikTok livestream.

On Sunday evening, a fresh update was posted on Perez’s blog, attributed to his family, in which they said: “To everyone who has reached out, checked in, and kept Perez and our family in your thoughts, THANK YOU!

“At this time, Perez remains hospitalised and is receiving the medical care he needs. His treatment is continuing in an inpatient setting under the care of a dedicated team of medical and mental health professionals.”

They also shared that Perez’s team will begin updating his celebrity blog from this week onwards while he continues his recovery.

“For now, Perez’s health remains the priority as his team keeps the site active and moving forward,” they added.

Earlier this month, police officers were called to Perez’s home in Miami in the wake of a TikTok livestream in which he was apparently seen self-harming.

The former Celebrity Big Brother housemate – whose legal name is Mario Lavandeira – was subsequently taken to a nearby hospital for medical attention.

“Perez’s condition remains serious but stable,” his family said last week. “He experienced significant blood loss and sustained additional injuries that will require surgery in the coming days.

“His treatment and recovery will be a long process. We are grateful that Perez was able to spend time with his mother and sister yesterday.

“As our family remains focused on Perez’s treatment and recovery, we also need the space and privacy to care for everyone affected by this situation.”

Before that, the family had said their “highest priority” was helping Perez’s children – aged 13, 11 and eight – “begin to heal from what they experienced” following the episode.

They noted that his children, niece and sister had all been at Perez’s home before the livestream got underway, but “immediately fled to protect the children from witnessing any further trauma” when it “became clear that Perez was experiencing a severe mental health crisis and harming himself”.

Share Button

Low-fat vegan diet helps people lose weight without eating less

A low-fat vegan diet can reduce the energy density of the foods people eat by about 30%, helping them consume fewer calories while still eating satisfying amounts of food. The approach was also associated with weight loss, even though participants were not instructed to restrict calories, according to new research published in JAMA Network Open.

In a randomized clinical trial involving adults with overweight, participants who followed an ad libitum low-fat vegan diet substantially reduced the number of calories per gram of food they consumed. Researchers found that greater reductions in energy density were tied to lower calorie intake and greater weight loss, despite the absence of any instructions to eat less.

“This helps answer a question people often have about plant-based eating: How can you lose weight without counting calories or going hungry?” said Hana Kahleova, MD, PhD, director of clinical research at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and lead author. “The answer is energy density. Plant foods are rich in water and fiber, so you can fill your plate, feel full, and still take in fewer calories.”

How the Low-Fat Vegan Diet Was Tested

The findings come from an analysis of a 16-week randomized trial involving adults with overweight. Participants were assigned either to an ad libitum low-fat vegan diet centered on fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes, or to a control group that continued eating as usual without making any dietary changes.

Neither group was given a calorie target or told to limit how much they ate. Researchers measured each participant’s dietary energy density by comparing total daily energy intake with the total weight of food consumed, expressed as total energy (kcal per day) divided by total food weight (grams per day).

The study produced several notable findings:

  • The total weight of food consumed did not change significantly in either group, meaning those following the vegan diet continued eating about the same amount of food by weight.
  • Calorie intake declined in both groups, but the decrease was larger among those following the vegan diet, at about 357 kcal/day.
  • Energy density remained essentially unchanged in the control group but fell by about 30% in the vegan group.
  • Larger reductions in energy density were associated with greater weight loss, and that relationship remained even after researchers accounted for changes in calorie intake.

Same Amount of Food, Fewer Calories

The difference came largely from changes in the types of foods participants were eating. The vegan diet removed calorie-dense animal foods including meat, dairy, and eggs while increasing consumption of foods that provide more volume for relatively few calories, particularly vegetables and legumes.

Because these plant foods generally contain fewer calories per gram, participants could continue eating generous portions while taking in less energy overall.

“This isn’t about willpower or smaller portions,” Dr. Kahleova said. “It’s about choosing foods that naturally deliver fewer calories in every bite. A 30% reduction in energy density is a substantial shift that would be very hard to achieve and sustain through portion control alone.”

Why Energy Density Can Affect Weight Loss

Energy density refers to the number of calories contained in each gram of food. Scientists have studied it for years because it can influence how much people eat and how satisfied they feel after a meal.

Controlled feeding studies have shown that reducing the energy density of meals can help people feel full while lowering the amount of energy they consume. Importantly, the physical volume of food can remain similar even when the calorie content drops.

“When the foods you eat are lower in energy density, your body’s natural appetite signals work in your favor,” Dr. Kahleova said. “You eat until you’re satisfied, and you simply end up with fewer calories. That’s a sustainable way to manage weight.”

A Different Approach to Weight Management

Weight-loss advice often emphasizes calorie restriction and smaller portions. These findings point to another possible strategy: changing the composition of the food on the plate rather than simply reducing the amount of food eaten.

Choosing more water-rich, high-fiber plant foods may help people lower their calorie intake while still eating enough to feel satisfied. That could make weight management easier for some people by reducing the sense of deprivation that can come with traditional calorie-cutting approaches.

“From a clinical standpoint, targeting energy density offers a realistic strategy for weight loss,” Dr. Kahleova said. “Instead of telling people to eat less, we can help them eat differently — and the results follow.”

The Bottom Line

The findings suggest that a low-fat vegan diet can substantially reduce dietary energy density, allowing people to consume fewer calories and lose weight without intentionally restricting their calorie intake.

“You don’t have to eat less,” Dr. Kahleova said. “You can eat more food, feel full, and still lose weight — by choosing foods that are naturally lower in energy density.”

Share Button

Tiny 1.7-billion-year-old fossils could reveal how complex life began

The search for life on Mars or on icy moons such as Europa and Enceladus may capture more attention, but another major astrobiology mystery is much closer to home. Scientists are still trying to understand when the first eukaryotes appeared on Earth and how those organisms helped set the stage for complex life.

That question matters because microbial organisms dominated Earth for roughly 90 percent of the planet’s history. Reconstructing the transition from a world populated almost entirely by microbes to one filled with plants, animals, and fungi could also help scientists understand whether complex life might develop elsewhere in the universe.

From Microbes to Complex Life

Life originated on Earth more than 3.5 billion years ago, according to Ross Anderson, a paleontologist at the University of Oxford in the U.K. Cyanobacteria and oxygen-producing photosynthesis were present by at least 2.3 billion years ago, while eukaryotes had appeared by at least 1.7 billion years ago.

Algae followed at least one billion years ago and probably emerged even earlier. Animals appeared at least 570 million years ago, and possibly somewhat before that.

To reach the common ancestor shared by the plant and animal kingdoms, Anderson says researchers must look back to around 1.6 billion years ago.

Crown eukaryotes, which are among the earliest eukaryotic forms scientists are trying to trace, played a crucial role in the emergence of complex life on Earth. Anderson considers eukaryotes to represent the planet’s first complex life.

What Makes Eukaryotes Different?

Eukaryotic cells contain a nucleus that encloses their DNA. They also contain organelles, which are specialized structures inside the cell. One example is the mitochondrion, which helps provide the energy needed to support more demanding forms of life.

Eukaryotes ultimately gave rise to complex multicellular organisms and large visible life forms. Every animal, plant, and fungus around us today is eukaryotic.

Finding their earliest ancestors, however, is extremely difficult.

Organisms older than 500 million years did not yet possess shells or skeletons. Because those hard structures had not evolved, paleontologists must rely on rare environments capable of preserving fragile cells and soft tissues.

That leaves scientists with relatively little information about how life changed during an enormous span covering about 90 percent of Earth’s history.

Searching for the Transition to Multicellular Life

Anderson’s research focuses on one of the biggest transitions in biological history: how Earth changed from a planet dominated by bacteria into one inhabited by complex multicellular organisms.

Because fossils of these early multicellular organisms are difficult to find, he studies the chemistry of ancient rocks to identify the environments most likely to have preserved them.

Another major obstacle is time itself. Eukaryotic microfossils have endured billions of years of geological alteration and degradation, making already tiny remains even harder to detect.

Scientists do know that the transition from single-celled life to multicellular organisms happened more than once in different parts of the world. Anderson is particularly interested in understanding how that process eventually produced the remarkable diversity seen among animals today.

Much of the foundation for modern animal diversity appeared around the Ediacaran/Cambrian transition roughly 540 million years ago. This period marked a major evolutionary shift from predominantly soft-bodied organisms toward the Cambrian explosion, when animals with greater mobility, shells, and skeletons became increasingly prominent.

Where Scientists Search for Ancient Microfossils

Finding fossils from much earlier periods requires searching in places where delicate biological material had an unusual chance of surviving.

Anderson and his colleagues are especially interested in a roughly 100sq. km region near Svalbard, Norway. About 80 degrees North, this remote island area was once covered by a shallow sea.

Australia has also produced important evidence. Just last year, researchers there discovered some of the oldest known eukaryotic microfossils, dating to roughly 1.75 billion years ago.

Ancient coastal environments are especially promising places to search. Eukaryotes living in these settings would have had access to abundant nutrients and organic material, conditions that could have supported greater diversity and the development of multicellularity.

Researchers often target pristine locations or regions that have received relatively little scientific sampling. Anderson specializes in studying areas where enormous deposits of clay may have helped preserve ancient eukaryotic remains.

Today, many of the best places to conduct this work are deserts or Arctic landscapes. With little or no vegetation covering the ground, ancient rocks remain exposed and accessible.

Why the Fossil Hunt Is So Difficult

Even in ideal locations, finding eukaryotic microfossils is an enormous challenge. The organisms were microscopic, lacked protective hard tissues, and have been exposed to billions of years of geological degradation.

According to Anderson, one of the greatest problems is simply that the fossil record from this period remains poorly sampled.

Researchers are nevertheless making progress. Scientists are becoming better at identifying the types of rocks most likely to contain early fossils, providing new evidence that can help reconstruct the history of Earth’s earliest life.

What Earth’s Earliest Life Could Tell Us About Alien Life

The search has implications far beyond understanding Earth’s biological past.

Anderson says much of his work involving clay deposits was originally motivated by the search for life on other planets. By learning which environments preserve ancient organisms on Earth, scientists may become better equipped to recognize possible signs of life elsewhere.

Understanding how life emerged and became increasingly complex on our own planet is therefore an important part of astrobiology. If scientists want to estimate how likely life is to arise and evolve elsewhere, they first need a clearer picture of how that process unfolded here on Earth.

Share Button

Scientists turn DNA into a memory device that uses 100x less power

DNA serves as the genetic blueprint for every living organism, but it is also an extraordinarily dense way to store information. A single gram can hold about 215 million gigabytes of data. Bringing that remarkable storage capacity into electronics could lead to more efficient data centers, faster processing and systems capable of handling increasingly complex information.

The challenge has been finding a way to make biological DNA function effectively alongside electronic materials. Penn State researchers have now developed an approach designed to overcome that incompatibility.

The work, published in Advanced Functional Materials and the subject of a patent application, relies on two key components. One is synthetic DNA, made from commercially available, chemically engineered molecules arranged into short genetic sequences tailored for specific electronic requirements. The other is crystalline perovskite, a semiconductor already used in technologies including solar cells, lasers and data storage devices.

“Biology and electronics are different domains,” said Kavya S. Keremane, co-corresponding author and postdoctoral researcher in materials science and engineering at Penn State. “Bridging these two fields required developing an entirely new materials platform that allows them to function seamlessly together. By combining the information storage capabilities of DNA with the exceptional electronic properties of perovskite semiconductors, we created a bio-hybrid system that fundamentally changes how low-power memory devices can be designed.”

Building a Low Power Memory Device

Using these materials, the team created a memory resistor, known as a “memristor,” that operates with very little energy. Unlike ordinary resistors, which maintain a set resistance to electrical current in devices ranging from cell phones to space shuttles and lose their stored information when power disappears, memristors can preserve a record of previous electrical activity. They can remember the direction in which current previously flowed even after the power source is removed.

That ability allows information to be stored and processed in the same place, resembling the way neurons function in the brain. Such an arrangement could support more simultaneous and sophisticated forms of data processing. According to the researchers, however, practical commercial systems would still require enough storage capacity and electrical power to become costly and inefficient without DNA’s ability to pack enormous amounts of information into a very small space while consuming little energy.

“As the demand for artificial intelligence (AI) grows, we need a new strategy for low-power, high-storage devices,” said Bed Poudel, co-corresponding author and research professor of materials science and engineering at Penn State.

Poudel said AI and other emerging technologies are expected to depend increasingly on neuromorphic computing, which is designed to operate more like the human brain. Such systems can evaluate multiple inputs at once while making decisions informed by previous experiences and future priorities.

“Usually, it takes more power to store more information. Our device, however, consumes 100 times less power and the storage capacity is higher than traditional storage devices, like flash drives.”

Engineering DNA to Conduct Electricity

To construct the device, the researchers added silver nanoparticles to a layer of customized DNA sequences — specially designed to be of certain compositions and lengths — that was integrated with thin films of perovskite.

This technique, called “doping,” involves introducing a small amount of another material to produce specific properties. In this case, adding the silver nanoparticles allowed the DNA to conduct electricity while also helping its molecular units line up in a more orderly arrangement.

Synthetic DNA offered another important advantage over natural DNA. Unlike natural DNA — long, entangled strands that behave like wet spaghetti when handled — short and rigid pieces of synthetic DNA can be arranged with much greater precision at extremely small scales.

According to co-author Neela H. Yennawar, research professor and director of the Penn State Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences’ Biomolecular Interactions Core Facility, molecularly engineered DNA can provide structural organization, adjustable electrical conductivity and functional control that natural DNA cannot achieve when incorporated into thin films.

“We can computationally determine exactly which sequences we need and how long they should be, and then we can rationally design them with synthetic DNA,” Yennawar said. “These structures can be systematically doped with silver and other ions and engineered to interface seamlessly with perovskites — transforming DNA from a biological macromolecule into a programmable, multifunctional nanomaterials platform.”

DNA and Perovskite Work Better Together

When combined, the silver-doped DNA and perovskite formed bio-hybrid pathways that directed the flow of electrical current through the device.

The researchers found that electrons moved reliably when they applied less than 0.1 volt — for comparison, standard U.S. outlets have 120 volts — and the device responded predictably when the direction of the current was changed.

The carefully designed DNA structures, combined with the perovskite, also helped make the device unusually stable. According to the team, it continued operating consistently at temperatures approaching 250 degrees Fahrenheit and remained functional at room temperature for more than six weeks, substantially exceeding the performance standards of existing perovskite-based memory storage devices.

The researchers also reported that the new system could perform the same memory function as comparable technologies while consuming only one-tenth as much power. That level of efficiency could make the approach especially attractive for future electronics designed to handle large amounts of information with lower energy demands.

“Using just the DNA or just perovskite alone did not produce near as robust a result as the combination,” Keremane said. “It’s this combination that enables a very high memory storage density that requires very little power.”

A New Direction for Bio-Inspired Electronics

The team now plans to improve the technology further and explore additional uses for bio-inspired electronic systems.

“Nature has the solution — we just have to find it and apply it,” Poudel said. “This work of integrating DNA into electronics to do amazing things gives a glimpse into what is possible.”

In addition to Keremane, Yennawar and Poudel, other Penn State co-authors include co-corresponding author Luyao Zheng, postdoctoral research in materials science and engineering; Haodong Wu, doctoral student in materials science and engineering; Jiamao Zheng, who was a master’s student in materials science and engineering at the time of research and has since graduated from Penn State; Shashank Priya, who was a professor of materials science and engineering at the time of research; and Chiranth C. Ravi, who was a master’s student in the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences at the time of research and has since graduated from Penn State. Abhinav Gorthy and co-corresponding author Rashmi Jha, chemical engineering and materials science, University of Minnesota, also contributed.

The U.S. National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, Penn State and the University of Minnesota supported this research.

Share Button

Researchers Say It’s Time To Ask A Different Question About Dementia

When we think of dementia, symptoms like memory loss and confusion might spring to mind. And that’s completely reasonable – dementia is a condition that progressively affects memory and thinking.

But researchers think there are other parts to the picture.

People with dementia can have periods of “paradoxical lucidity”, or moments when a long-term dementia patient’s brain seems to briefly snap back to what it once was. Carers say moments like these are common.

They can last for minutes or hours and may make a dementia patient’s loved one feel as if, for a while at least, the “fog lifted”.

Dr Heather E. Whitson, a professor of neuroscience, the director of the Duke Ageing Centre, and co-director of the Duke/UNC Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centre, said: “I really think that a lot of what we learn about these dramatic episodes could have bearing on better cognition and better outcomes throughout the disease.”

She is one of many academics who’ll join the Lucidity in Alzheimer’s and Dementia (LEAD) Network.

What is LEAD Network?

The upcoming project, due to start this autumn, aims to create a standard definition of lucidity, understand how it affects caregivers and families, and work out the mechanisms behind lucid periods.

Some reports suggest that triggers like music may help to induce these states of clarity among dementia patients. But the team behind LEAD Network want more hard science to explain what’s really going on during clearer spells.

It’s even hoped that working out why lucidity happens in dementia could help researchers find ways to protect us from the condition, and even recover memories.

“We’ve spent decades focused on preventing dementia and treating dementia,” Whitson stated. “This research asks a different question: What allows moments of preserved function to emerge, even in the setting of advanced disease?”

Researchers think periods of lucidity could mean functional parts of the brain remain – it may be a question of access

Lucidity among long-term dementia patients may have to do with what’s been called the brain’s “substrate”, or the hidden, underlying part of the brain that still seems capable of regular, or better-than-usual, function.

Dr Whitson said that the times when a person with advanced dementia is able to remember a loved one or sing every chorus of a song “suggest there is still some preserved substrate there. It means that a profound part of their self – which dementia took away – is still there”.

Maybe research like the one she and others are set to undertake could make accessing that “substrate” more predictable and reliably possible.

The professor claimed, “Neuroscientists often frame cognitive resilience as your mind’s ability to hang on to a capacity even though there is brain damage.

“But lucid episodes tell us that even when a capacity seems as if it’s lost, it may not be lost forever.”

Share Button

This 10-cent heart drug cuts hospitalizations by 25%

A low dose of digoxin may help people with heart failure avoid hospitalization and reduce the risk of death, according to three studies led by UMCG cardiologists Dirk Jan van Veldhuisen, Kevin Damman, and Peter van der Meer. The researchers believe the new findings could eventually influence heart failure treatment guidelines and make this inexpensive medication available to many more patients.

Heart failure is a serious and growing health problem. More than 500,000 people in the Netherlands are estimated to have the condition, and that number is expected to increase in the years ahead. In people with heart failure, the heart cannot pump blood as effectively as it should. This can lead to severe shortness of breath, fatigue, and repeated trips to the hospital.

Digoxin Could Join the ‘Fantastic Four’

Standard heart failure care currently relies on a combination of four medications, commonly known as the ‘Fantastic Four.’ Cardiologists have long investigated whether digoxin could provide additional benefits as a fifth treatment.

Three UMCG studies now provide evidence supporting that possibility. The findings were published in publications including Nature Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and were also presented at the ESC Heart Failure Congress in Barcelona.

Heart Failure Hospitalizations Fell by 25%

One of the studies included 1,000 people with heart failure who were treated at 43 centers across the Netherlands. Half received a low dose of digoxin in addition to their usual treatment for an average of three years, while the other half received a placebo.

Among those taking digoxin, deaths from cardiovascular disease and worsening heart failure were reduced (by 19%). However, that individual result did not reach statistical significance.

The researchers then combined the findings with data from two earlier studies in a meta-analysis, creating a much larger group of patients. With the additional data, they found that digoxin produced a meaningful and statistically significant benefit, even when patients were already taking the four standard heart failure medications.

The clearest benefit was a reduction in hospital admissions for heart failure, which fell by an average of 25%. Low-dose digoxin was also found to be safe and relatively easy to use.

Problems Increased After Digoxin Was Stopped

A third study followed approximately 600 of the original 1,000 participants who had been assigned either digoxin or placebo.

Researchers found that people who had been taking digoxin and then had to stop experienced significantly more problems during the first six weeks compared with people who had never taken the drug. Among 288 patients, 14 were hospitalized or died.

According to the researchers, this finding does not directly prove that digoxin is effective. Still, they considered the size and timing of the effect both impressive and surprising.

A Heart Failure Drug That Costs Less Than Ten Cents a Day

The researchers believe the results of the three studies could eventually lead to changes in heart failure guidelines, potentially allowing many more patients to receive digoxin.

Its low price makes the findings especially notable. Digoxin has been used in medicine for centuries and costs less than ten cents per day. By comparison, many newer heart failure medications cost several euros each day.

Why a Low Dose of Digoxin Matters

Digoxin (digitalis) is the oldest and least expensive medicine used to treat heart failure. At a low dose, the drug primarily works by reducing several harmful compensatory responses that occur when the heart is struggling. For example, digoxin suppresses stress hormones (such as adrenaline) in the blood, which can benefit the heart.

Higher doses of digoxin were commonly prescribed in the past. Those doses caused heart muscle cells to contract more strongly, but that effect ultimately proved less helpful. For a weakened heart muscle, reducing strain is preferable to forcing it to work harder.

During the past 25 to 30 years, several effective new treatments for heart failure have become available. As a result, digoxin use has steadily declined, and only about 15 percent of heart failure patients now receive it.

Earlier research had already suggested that patients given low doses of digoxin did considerably better than those receiving higher doses. Until the new UMCG research, however, randomized, prospective studies had not directly investigated and confirmed this effect.

Funding Made the Digoxin Studies Possible

Research involving older and inexpensive medications can be difficult to fund, even when those drugs have the potential to improve patient care while lowering costs.

Hartstichting therefore provided 3 million euros for this research through its collaboration with ZonMw as part of the Good Use of Medicines program.

Share Button

As A Teen, I Wrote A Famous Musician A Fan Letter. 23 Years After His Death, I Finally Got A Response

When I was 17 years old, I wrote Elliott Smith a fan letter.

It was the year 2000, and I was a high school senior in Dallas. I had never written a fan letter to anyone, but I felt connected to Elliott, despite the fact that we didn’t really have that much in common.

He was, after all, a man in his 30s who had tattoos and wore an assortment of black band tees, while I was a teenage girl who shopped at Abercrombie & Fitch. He sang about drinking and drugs; I hadn’t even tried my first beer.

He had the aura of a defiant nonconformist, while I was a pleaser and overachiever, writing for the school paper, singing in the choir, and joining an endless stream of extracurriculars and clubs to pad my college applications.

But Elliott seemed like the quiet type, and so was I, with high social anxiety and low self-esteem. He seemed like an outcast, and I often felt out of place and lonely in the Texas suburb where I grew up, even with family and friends around me.

He seemed sad; I was a bit sad too.

But what really mesmerised me most about Elliott was his vulnerability. He laid himself so bare in his music, and when I listened to his songs, it felt like reading a diary. It wasn’t just the lyrics – it was his soft singing style, his careful finger-picking, the way he layered vocal tracks so tenderly. I felt like I knew him, like I was a friend he trusted with his secrets.

I wanted to reach out to Elliott to thank him, and convey how important his music was to me. I found an address for his record label, Kill Rock Stars, in the liner notes of one of his CDs, and I mailed the letter. And then I waited.

Months passed, and no response. Maybe I sent it to the wrong address, I thought. I never really expected to hear back, but I did wonder if he even got it.

Graduation came and went. I headed off to college. Elliott didn’t release any new albums.

And in 2003, he died violently and tragically at the age of 34.

The subject line read “Fwd: Elliott Smith biography.” My former boss had passed along a message that was sent to my old work email – the one associated with my maiden name, which no one had called me in years. It was 2023, and I had recently turned 40.

The email was from a writer named Jamie Fisher, who said she was working on a biography about Elliott Smith.

“I’m wondering if you’re the same Kirby Van Amburgh who wrote a fan letter to him around 2000,” she wrote. “His family still has the letter, and I was wondering whether you got a response.”

I sucked in my breath. This means Elliott got my letter! I thought. He must have read it, right? And if he kept it, maybe it meant something to him.

I responded to Jamie immediately. Even though I hadn’t gotten anything from Elliott, she still wanted to talk to me, so we set up a time to chat on the phone the next week.

Before our phone call, Jamie also sent me a photo of my letter to Elliott. It was handwritten on notebook paper, both sides. In the letter, I wrote that I was a 17-year-old girl who had bought all of his CDs.

I think your music is really addictive. It’s so original and creative. I’ve never heard anything like it.

I shared that I liked to play the piano and guitar and sing. I told him that he was an inspiration to me, that listening to his music encouraged me to create my own style.

I try to write my own songs and make them as unique and personal to me as your work is to you.

But I didn’t want to be a musician as a career, I said.

I want to be a writer.

I praised him some more and said that even if my letter never reached him, it was OK.

You are worth the time it took to write this, and you’ll keep kicking ass.

I told him he was incredible and thanked him. I signed it with a “Sincerely.”

If Elliott did in fact read the letter, I could see why he kept it. I’m sure it was refreshing to get something so wholesome.

Elliott Smith.

C Brandon via Getty Images

Elliott Smith.

In the days that followed, I went up into the attic and pulled out my old high school diaries, skimming the pages for mentions of Elliott. I had written about him several times: I journalled about buying my first Elliott Smith CD and hearing the spidery notes of Speed Trials trickling through the speakers of my Magnavox boombox. And I wrote about my letter, saying, “I hope he gets it. I hope he likes it!”

When we finally got on the phone, Jamie asked if I had continued with my writing or music, and I told her about my winding career path: I was a teacher for several years, then worked at a nonprofit for the next decade. I had dabbled in freelance writing here and there, but it never went anywhere. At one point, I wrote a novel for kids, but it was never published.

I told her I had recently transitioned to a job as a writer for a market research company, which I really enjoyed because I got to write every day, albeit in a different way than I envisioned when I was 17.

I talked about my songwriting and how I was in a musical duo with my friend Todd in the early aughts. We put out an EP, some singles, and even a couple of music videos, filmed in Todd’s backyard. It was all just for fun, but it was also a bit stressful sharing my songs and putting myself on display like that.

I explained that creative writing – both on paper and in music – was emotionally difficult for me. Unlike writing for business, when I wrote anything personal, I felt an intense fear of being exposed. I put so much of myself in my fiction, essays, poems and songs. I was terrified of releasing them for public consumption because any rejection of my creative work felt like a rejection of me as a person. Perhaps that’s why I was so in awe of Elliott: he shared so much of himself in his art, in a way that I never quite could.

After a while, Jamie paused and said that she didn’t reach out to me just because of the book. There was another reason.

“Elliott wrote you a response.”

I literally burst into tears.

He did? I choked out. Jamie started crying too.

She said that Elliott’s letter was in the box with my letter. She didn’t know why he never sent it. Maybe he didn’t have a stamp and then forgot about it. At any rate, it was there, waiting to be found.

Jamie read the letter to me over the phone.

Dear Kirby, I read your letter and it made me happy – thanks.

Elliott wished me success with my writing, whatever success meant to me personally. He talked about his love of reading and recommended an author he was really into at the moment, Mikhail Bulgakov. He shared that he sometimes secretly wished he was a writer instead of a musician, as his music so often diverged from mainstream tastes.

He thanked me for adding a little brightness to his day.

I’m glad you see creativity in yourself, the world needs as much of it as it can get, so go out and kick ass!

He signed it with a heart.

The author with her husband and daughter (2025).

Photo Courtesy Of Kirby Rock

The author with her husband and daughter (2025).

After my call with Jamie, I felt a surge of inspiration. Since having my daughter three years earlier, I had stopped going to my writing group, and I hadn’t written a song or even played my instruments in a long time. But now I felt the urge to return to my writing and music, even if for no other purpose than bringing me joy.

In the months that followed, I brought my guitar down from the attic. I played Old MacDonald Had A Farm for my daughter over and over, building the calluses back up on my fingers. I wrote her an original song about handwashing, Scrubbly Bubs and Bubs and Scrubs (which was well received). Last year, along with my husband and two other dads, I played a three-song acoustic set of Raffi covers for our kids’ class at school. It was thrilling to see them laughing and clapping and dancing, a crowd of generous and adoring fans.

I rejoined my writing group. I wrote a little book about potty training for my daughter (which was less well received). I revisited a short story about alien abduction that I had initially drafted and abandoned several years earlier. I wrote a bad poem about the lizards on my back porch. I wrote this essay. Now I write and write and continue to write.

After I told one friend about Jamie’s call, he asked if I was upset that I never got the letter when I was a teen. I said no. Strangely, I was almost thankful that Elliott never sent the letter. It felt like his words were meant for me at age 40, not age 17. I received his encouragement when I really needed it – not when I was already full of excitement and hope and possibility, but later in life, when I needed to be reminded of the spark inside of me.

I wrote to Elliott years ago to thank him. And in a way, I wrote this to thank him again.

Nobody Broke Your Heart, an intimate biography of Elliott Smith by Jamie Fisher, will be released by Penguin Random House on Aug. 25.

Do you have a compelling personal story you’d like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we’re looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Share Button